The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 March 2014, 03:53 AM   #1
iamSamiam
"TRF" Member
 
iamSamiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Big D
Posts: 26
What's wrong with this 5512..

Looking at some 5512's. Besides perhaps a tad "rich" what do you think...too much "rebuilding" and "beautification"? Also...looks to be short a few links? I know others have had challenges with these guys not "telling" everything about their watches? This has all the desirable attributes of the quintessential 5512 wouldn't you say? Missing anything? http://www.ebay.com/itm/Rolex-Submar...item4d18ab9c1b

Last edited by iamSamiam; 28 March 2014 at 04:29 AM.. Reason: wrong link and post
iamSamiam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2014, 05:08 AM   #2
NukeMan
"TRF" Member
 
NukeMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Jonas
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 988
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamSamiam View Post
Looking at some 5512's. Besides perhaps a tad "rich" what do you think...too much "rebuilding" and "beautification"? Also...looks to be short a few links? I know others have had challenges with these guys not "telling" everything about their watches? This has all the desirable attributes of the quintessential 5512 wouldn't you say? Missing anything? http://www.ebay.com/itm/Rolex-Submar...item4d18ab9c1b
Buy the seller. Pass just based on the above!
NukeMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2014, 01:14 PM   #3
AbsolutelyROLEX!
"TRF" Member
 
AbsolutelyROLEX!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Andy
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: AKA: ANDERL712000
Posts: 4,935
Priced way too high, pass
Check ads here on the forum?
__________________
We want to be the first in the field and Rolex should be seen as the one and only-the best.

Hans Wilsdorf, Rolex founder
AbsolutelyROLEX! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2014, 01:19 PM   #4
Ben39
"TRF" Member
 
Ben39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Ben
Location: Asia
Watch: Gilt sub
Posts: 1,641
Pass for me
Ben39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2014, 02:51 PM   #5
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,432
Pass.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2014, 04:04 PM   #6
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
Why would you buy from someone who's "not telling everything about the watch"? I buy from my dealer and he tells me first and foremost all the flaws, before the good things
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2014, 06:53 PM   #7
swatty
2024 Pledge Member
 
swatty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,409
Why does it look like new ?
swatty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2014, 07:03 PM   #8
Mark020
"TRF" Member
 
Mark020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,094
Not too much wrong besides the price imho.
Mark020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2014, 10:51 PM   #9
JohnBaker3
2024 Pledge Member
 
JohnBaker3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: John Baker III
Location: Spring,Texas
Watch: 1971 Red Sub
Posts: 2,221
The case back says II.67 and 5513....doesn't match the dial which is 5512....
JohnBaker3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2014, 11:13 PM   #10
iamSamiam
"TRF" Member
 
iamSamiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Big D
Posts: 26
hehe...agreed thanks. The council has spoke! Yeah i'll keep my eyes open for a 5512 on TRF. @JohnBaker3 i noted that too.
iamSamiam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2014, 11:13 PM   #11
JerimiahLee
"TRF" Member
 
JerimiahLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Jerimiah
Location: NYC
Watch: 5513 Meters 1st
Posts: 669
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnBaker3 View Post
The case back says II.67 and 5513....doesn't match the dial which is 5512....
Common with 5512 and 5513's of this era.

The photos seems to have been edited or taken under studio light, I would ask for some photos of the piece in natural light. However, if you have any doubts about the seller, hold on for the right seller and right piece.
JerimiahLee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2014, 11:56 PM   #12
NukeMan
"TRF" Member
 
NukeMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Jonas
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 988
Quote:
Originally Posted by jerimiahlee View Post
common with 5512 and 5513's of this era.

The photos seems to have been edited or taken under studio light, i would ask for some photos of the piece in natural light. However, if you have any doubts about the seller, hold on for the right seller and right piece.
x2
NukeMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2014, 02:12 AM   #13
zapokee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,354
Yes, have seen a number of legit 5512s marked 5513 inside the caseback. It seems Rolex used these casebacks interchangeably for the 5512. Things were more relaxed in the sixties and seventies, probably due to all those funny cigarettes...

However, I've never seen a 5513 with a 5512 caseback.
zapokee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2014, 02:27 AM   #14
ROGERB
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Roger
Location: WHITE ROCK BC
Watch: 89 16610, 57 7914,
Posts: 897
Way too much going on here replacement dial ( stated in service records/ not a bad thing ) serial number on case puts watch in 4th quarter of 67 case back sez 2nd quarter, band from 1984, 1560 movement? if a 5512 s/b 1570, could be wrong but don't see many 1560 movements passed 1965-66 (1560 18000vph/ 1570 19800vph) Things like a Cuban classic car! Pass
R
ROGERB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2014, 09:18 AM   #15
iamSamiam
"TRF" Member
 
iamSamiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Big D
Posts: 26
Hah! Preach it RogerB. Nice work! :) I'm walking...and was after a couple posts from others..thanks guys.
iamSamiam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2014, 09:39 AM   #16
soundserious
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: usofmfa
Posts: 3,157
A Rolex serviced 5512 in what looks to be fairly good condition to my eye. Not sure how much cheaper you're hoping to get one...

Regarding the seller I have no idea, but the name of the shop on the service papers is world renown (and definitely worth a visit). Anyway good luck on your search.
soundserious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2014, 10:31 AM   #17
iamSamiam
"TRF" Member
 
iamSamiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Big D
Posts: 26
can it be too clean or polished?

Viknijjar....it is clean (well it's been cleaned...replaced, tightened up, and polished)...but unless i'm mistaken doing all that "beautification" takes away from the authenticy and in the end value? Isn't that true? And from what others have said there is a lot of mismatch.

Dont get me wrong i'm not looking for a piece dusted off and pulled out of the safe complete with hanging tags still attached from 1969....but i do want a piece i'll wear often and ultimately gain value over time while I enjoy it.

Either way...it is the 5512 i'll have to have!
iamSamiam is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.