ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

ROGERB · 1 July 2008, 08:37 AM

Could a 64 GMT if original have a large pointer or should it have a small pointer...ser is 114XXXX! thks R

stevemulholland3 · 1 July 2008, 08:54 AM

small one.

mike · 1 July 2008, 09:13 AM

If original a small 24 hr, hand and gilt dial.

ROGERB · 1 July 2008, 10:04 AM

The serial number to me would be a 64, and in terms of "the stack" of the hands the 24 hr hand is first. The dial looks correct and as I stated before the serial is 1149XXX. Based on that serial could I have the yr wrong?
Sorry no pictures but did have the watch in my hands for inspection....just trying to identify for the present owner!!
thanks
R

mike · 1 July 2008, 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROGERB

The serial number to me would be a 64, and in terms of "the stack" of the hands the 24 hr hand is first. The dial looks correct and as I stated before the serial is 1149XXX. Based on that serial could I have the yr wrong?
Sorry no pictures but did have the watch in my hands for inspection....just trying to identify for the present owner!!
thanks
R

That would correct for the stack.

Look anything like this?

ROGERB · 1 July 2008, 10:15 AM

IDENTICAL.. except for the 24 hand...it also is a pepsi and other than a few buffable scratches in the crystal, in very similiar condition with the markers still glowing.... must have had a dial service as that is a long time for Tritium to still glow!!
thanks Mike
R

mike · 1 July 2008, 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROGERB

IDENTICAL.. except for the 24 hand...it also is a pepsi and other than a few buffable scratches in the crystal, in very similiar condition with the markers still glowing.... must have had a dial service as that is a long time for Tritium to still glow!!
thanks Mike
R

Well,...how long does it glow? You might be seeing the phosphors when they react to light. If it's just for a few seconds that might be it.

Sounds like the 24 hr, hand was replaced sometime along the line. Happened a lot. A small one can be had with a little searching.

SPACE-DWELLER · 2 July 2008, 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike

That would correct for the stack.

Look anything like this?

1 July 2008, 08:37 AM	#1
ROGERB "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Roger Location: WHITE ROCK BC Watch: 89 16610, 57 7914, Posts: 897	1964 gmt Could a 64 GMT if original have a large pointer or should it have a small pointer...ser is 114XXXX! thks R

1 July 2008, 08:54 AM	#2
stevemulholland3 Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: steven Location: tampa bay Watch: 1680 18k sub Posts: 6,672	small one.

1 July 2008, 09:13 AM	#3
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	If original a small 24 hr, hand and gilt dial.

1 July 2008, 10:04 AM	#4
ROGERB "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Roger Location: WHITE ROCK BC Watch: 89 16610, 57 7914, Posts: 897	The serial number to me would be a 64, and in terms of "the stack" of the hands the 24 hr hand is first. The dial looks correct and as I stated before the serial is 1149XXX. Based on that serial could I have the yr wrong? Sorry no pictures but did have the watch in my hands for inspection....just trying to identify for the present owner!! thanks R

1 July 2008, 10:15 AM	#6
ROGERB "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Roger Location: WHITE ROCK BC Watch: 89 16610, 57 7914, Posts: 897	IDENTICAL.. except for the 24 hand...it also is a pepsi and other than a few buffable scratches in the crystal, in very similiar condition with the markers still glowing.... must have had a dial service as that is a long time for Tritium to still glow!! thanks Mike R

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)