ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

kabzi · 1 June 2017, 06:53 PM

Hello Fellas,

As soon as I receive my new Seadweller I prepared a detailed comparison with the previous version. There are many updates on the new one and honestly speaking it seems to me the best stainless steel Rolex model.

Here are some photos and the link of the review. Thanks for reading :

116600 vs. 126600

Jambos5151 · 1 June 2017, 07:03 PM

Have just scanned through the review and it appears thorough. I am going to order a coffee, sit and take my time , and enjoy the read . Great post thanks

Kippers · 1 June 2017, 07:25 PM

Great review but for me, the 116600 is still king of the sea dwellers. Thanks

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

brandrea · 1 June 2017, 09:01 PM

Thanks for your post and review. They need to correct their price on the chart though, they have them reversed.

I agree with you the SD43 is darn near perfect IMO

anakyn101 · 1 June 2017, 09:01 PM

Thank you for the very interesting review, great job!

efti · 1 June 2017, 09:12 PM

I don't know, still looks like an oversized Sub in my eyes, there are things that I like for sure (SEL design, red text detail, even the cyclops) but I hoped they could make it like 42mm, more like the Exp2 size... still like the 116600 more as well

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

1William · 1 June 2017, 09:19 PM

Thanks for the information.

Moggo · 1 June 2017, 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by efti

I don't know, still looks like an oversized Sub in my eyes, there are things that I like for sure (SEL design, red text detail, even the cyclops) but I hoped they could make it like 42mm, more like the Exp2 size... still like the 116600 more as well

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I agree with this, not distinct enough from the Sub, a cool watch nonetheless.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

coleburns · 1 June 2017, 10:23 PM

nice! long review for the train ride home. I saw one in person yesterday and it just looks amazing. it's a tad big for my wrist but i am going to get it regardless.

thanks

James2001 · 1 June 2017, 10:40 PM

I'd stick with the 116600, sd43 looks too big on you

JorgeCCW · 1 June 2017, 11:43 PM

I think it's an awesome watch , love it, I like big watches and the weight of it ; but in the same token I have to admit that in my eyes the sub and the Daytona are still the signature pieces on the Rolex sport watches line up

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ejvette · 1 June 2017, 11:55 PM

Its a very nice piece and a nice review but to call it "The Best SS Rolex" well opinions vary on that subject.

Calatrava r · 2 June 2017, 12:13 AM

is the only way to go. The new model lacks prospective and is too big for you and most people. I suspect the 126600 will struggle sale wise after the initial pop goes away.

travisb · 2 June 2017, 12:14 AM

Nice work!

kabzi · 2 June 2017, 03:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jambos5151

Have just scanned through the review and it appears thorough. I am going to order a coffee, sit and take my time , and enjoy the read . Great post thanks

Many thanks my friend, enjoy

kabzi · 2 June 2017, 03:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kippers

Great review but for me, the 116600 is still king of the sea dwellers. Thanks

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Thanks to you. I advise you to go and try the new one on your wrist in case you didn't do it yet.

kabzi · 2 June 2017, 03:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brandrea

Thanks for your post and review. They need to correct their price on the chart though, they have them reversed.

I agree with you the SD43 is darn near perfect IMO

Thanks for the warning mate. I revised the article accordingly.

kabzi · 2 June 2017, 03:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anakyn101

Thank you for the very interesting review, great job!

kabzi · 2 June 2017, 03:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by efti

I don't know, still looks like an oversized Sub in my eyes, there are things that I like for sure (SEL design, red text detail, even the cyclops) but I hoped they could make it like 42mm, more like the Exp2 size... still like the 116600 more as well

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Thanks for your comments. I used many different rolexes during the time ( You may check my feed on instagram @soalfb ). According to my taste this one is the best. I always find 40 mm very small for my wrist. Deepsea was ok but it's really getting uncomfortable after 2-3 hours use.

watchwatcher · 2 June 2017, 03:08 AM

It's a beauty, for sure...would love to see and try one on someday.

But, the best SS model? That's covering a lot of territory right there.

kabzi · 2 June 2017, 03:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1William

Thanks for the information.

kabzi · 2 June 2017, 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moggo

I agree with this, not distinct enough from the Sub, a cool watch nonetheless.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks for your comment mate

kabzi · 2 June 2017, 03:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coleburns

nice! long review for the train ride home. I saw one in person yesterday and it just looks amazing. it's a tad big for my wrist but i am going to get it regardless.

thanks

Hope you get it soon bro.

brandrea · 2 June 2017, 03:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kabzi

Thanks for the warning mate. I revised the article accordingly.

kabzi · 2 June 2017, 03:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James2001

I'd stick with the 116600, sd43 looks too big on you

Both are nice. Better to choose the one which looks better on the wrist.

kabzi · 2 June 2017, 03:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JorgeCCW

I think it's an awesome watch , love it, I like big watches and the weight of it ; but in the same token I have to admit that in my eyes the sub and the Daytona are still the signature pieces on the Rolex sport watches line up

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

kabzi · 2 June 2017, 03:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Calatrava r

is the only way to go. The new model lacks prospective and is too big for you and most people. I suspect the 126600 will struggle sale wise after the initial pop goes away.

Let's see my friend. I believe that the number of the production will be important. I also think that Deepsea sales will get effected with this release.

kabzi · 2 June 2017, 03:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by travisb

Nice work!

33JS · 2 June 2017, 03:30 AM

I love the new Seadweller 126600, but I'm 'in love' with my older 116600 and the pics in this review show me why!

The 116600 is the perfect watch, flies under the radar and is pure class.

I know when I'm wearing my 126600, but I forget that I'm wearing the 116600. Size is not an issue as I'm 6' 5" and 230lbs - the 116600 is still just wonderful.

eonflux · 2 June 2017, 04:13 AM

Great review/comparison
Thanks for posting!

1 June 2017, 06:53 PM	#1
kabzi "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Real Name: Serdar Location: Istanbul Watch: AP 15202 Jumbo Posts: 143	Seadweller Comparison 116600 vs 126600 Hello Fellas, As soon as I receive my new Seadweller I prepared a detailed comparison with the previous version. There are many updates on the new one and honestly speaking it seems to me the best stainless steel Rolex model. Here are some photos and the link of the review. Thanks for reading : 116600 vs. 126600

1 June 2017, 09:01 PM	#5
anakyn101 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Location: IT/FR/NL Watch: DRSD/RedSuB/COMEX Posts: 431	Thank you for the very interesting review, great job! __________________ SUB: 16800 Ghost Bezel; 1680 200 RedSub; 16610LV FAT 4 (Y) NOS; 16610LV FAT 4 (F) NOS; 16610LV FAT 4 (F) NOS / EXP: I 14270; I Freccione 1655; SD: 16660 Triple 6; 1665 Submariner 2000-DRSD; 1665 Great White MKI; 116600 SD4K NOS (2); 116660 DSSD MKI; 16600 Sommozzatori Polipetto NOS; 16600 NOS; (2) 126600 SD43 NOS; 16600 COMEX NOS / DAYTONA: 116500 NOS (4); 16520 Zenith (6) NOS; 116520 (5) NOS; P.P+++

1 June 2017, 11:43 PM	#11
JorgeCCW "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Jorge Location: Ohio, USA Watch: Rolex,Patek and AP Posts: 4,687	I think it's an awesome watch , love it, I like big watches and the weight of it ; but in the same token I have to admit that in my eyes the sub and the Daytona are still the signature pieces on the Rolex sport watches line up Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Nothing happens until something moves " Albert Einstein

1 June 2017, 11:55 PM	#12
ejvette 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Real Name: Ed Location: East Hampton NY Watch: me break clays.. Posts: 7,495	Its a very nice piece and a nice review but to call it "The Best SS Rolex" well opinions vary on that subject. __________________ Rolex•Omega•Breitling•Grand Seiko "The only difference between crazy and eccentric is the size of ones bank account" Anonymous * Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons *

2 June 2017, 12:13 AM	#13
Calatrava r 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2017 Location: United States Watch: Rolex and Patek Posts: 10,691	116600 is the only way to go. The new model lacks prospective and is too big for you and most people. I suspect the 126600 will struggle sale wise after the initial pop goes away.

1 June 2017, 07:03 PM	#2
Jambos5151 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: Spain Posts: 367	Have just scanned through the review and it appears thorough. I am going to order a coffee, sit and take my time , and enjoy the read . Great post thanks

1 June 2017, 07:25 PM	#3
Kippers "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Real Name: Alex K Location: England Watch: SD4K, BLNR, Hulk Posts: 397	Great review but for me, the 116600 is still king of the sea dwellers. Thanks Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

1 June 2017, 09:01 PM	#4
brandrea 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Brian (TBone) Location: canada Watch: es make me smile Posts: 74,257	Thanks for your post and review. They need to correct their price on the chart though, they have them reversed. I agree with you the SD43 is darn near perfect IMO

1 June 2017, 09:12 PM	#6
efti Banned Join Date: May 2016 Location: Muscat Watch: Batman,SubC & LMPO Posts: 164	I don't know, still looks like an oversized Sub in my eyes, there are things that I like for sure (SEL design, red text detail, even the cyclops) but I hoped they could make it like 42mm, more like the Exp2 size... still like the 116600 more as well Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

1 June 2017, 09:19 PM	#7
1William 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex/Others Posts: 45,188	Thanks for the information.

1 June 2017, 10:23 PM	#9
coleburns "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2017 Location: london Posts: 395	nice! long review for the train ride home. I saw one in person yesterday and it just looks amazing. it's a tad big for my wrist but i am going to get it regardless. thanks

1 June 2017, 10:40 PM	#10
James2001 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2017 Real Name: 2001 Location: Boston Watch: SD4K Posts: 16	I'd stick with the 116600, sd43 looks too big on you

2 June 2017, 12:14 AM	#14
travisb 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 32,401	Nice work!

2 June 2017, 03:08 AM	#20
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 34,552	It's a beauty, for sure...would love to see and try one on someday. But, the best SS model? That's covering a lot of territory right there.

2 June 2017, 03:30 AM	#29
33JS "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: John Location: Scotland Watch: SD 50th Ann Posts: 444	I love the new Seadweller 126600, but I'm 'in love' with my older 116600 and the pics in this review show me why! The 116600 is the perfect watch, flies under the radar and is pure class. I know when I'm wearing my 126600, but I forget that I'm wearing the 116600. Size is not an issue as I'm 6' 5" and 230lbs - the 116600 is still just wonderful.

2 June 2017, 04:13 AM	#30
eonflux "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: SNA Posts: 3,622	Great review/comparison Thanks for posting!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)