The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 August 2017, 03:17 PM   #31
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
AFAIK those were government property and thus not privately owned. The only watch that actually went to the moon that has ever been sold was a Bulova.

I suppose those speedys would be more valuable but since they are not really in the market to begin with its hard to place any actual value on them.
a moon rolex gmt was sold for 131k

http://www.rolexmagazine.com/2009/10...auctioned.html
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 August 2017, 03:21 PM   #32
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by breitlings View Post
not true. a moon rolex gmt was sold for 131k

http://www.rolexmagazine.com/2009/10...auctioned.html
the Bulova sold for 1.6 million in 2015

https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/mo...or-%241million
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 August 2017, 03:23 PM   #33
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
the Bulova sold for 1.6 million in 2015

https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/mo...or-%241million
i will look into that it seems interesting but i was suggesting the bulova wasnt the only moon watch sold.
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 August 2017, 03:27 PM   #34
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by breitlings View Post
i will look into that it seems interesting but i was suggesting the bulova wasnt the only moon watch sold.
that rolex, i don't know the story so i have no idea. The astronaut it apparently belonged to was the lunar module pilot and didn't personally go to the moon himself. So it would be weird for him to ask one of the other two guys to bring it to the surface of the moon for him. I would have thought they had more pressing issues at the time.
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 August 2017, 03:29 PM   #35
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
that rolex, i don't know the story so i have no idea. The astronaut it apparently belonged to was the lunar module pilot and didn't personally go to the moon himself. So it would be weird for him to ask one of the other two guys to bring it to the surface of the moon for him. I would have thought they had more pressing issues at the time.
the provenance both engraved on the watch and in letter is that he did ask the watch to be worn on the moon. please read the article which is linked which clearly says that. but if you are disputing rhe article i have linked then i cannot comment further.

i disnt know any bulovas were taken. 1.6 million seems like an insane price. were any other bulovas taken to space?
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 August 2017, 03:34 PM   #36
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by breitlings View Post
the provenance both engraved on the watch and in letter is that he did ask the watch to be worn on the moon. please read the article which is linked which clearly says that. but if you are disputing rhe article i have linked then i cannot comment further.

i disnt know any bulovas were taken. 1.6 million seems like an insane price. were any other bulovas taken to space?
the selling price is why i thought i seemed odd. If it was me i would rather have a Rolex from the moon than a Bulova.

The Rolex auction was 6 years earlier but still that is a huge difference.
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 August 2017, 10:14 PM   #37
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 7,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
that rolex, i don't know the story so i have no idea. The astronaut it apparently belonged to was the lunar module pilot and didn't personally go to the moon himself. So it would be weird for him to ask one of the other two guys to bring it to the surface of the moon for him. I would have thought they had more pressing issues at the time.
The task would've been inconsequential in the grand scheme of things and nothing a fellow team member wouldn't have done for another as a favour, especially seeing as he will never ever have the opportunity to actually walk on the moon himself.
Even more so given the fact they all knew it was going to be the very last mission to the moon.
Who knows.
Maybe he wanted a special memento of the experience of having his very own personal watch go to the moon surface.
He may have been particularly savvy and thought it would be worth a few bob one day long after it had all faded into history and out of most peoples memory.

Entirely plausible I say.

Besides, I would've done the exact same for you if you asked me and we had trained side by side for months on end, every detail of our tasks associated exclusively for the very last mission.
You wouldn't even have to ask me nicely. I would just make it happen for you
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 August 2017, 11:20 PM   #38
CRM114
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: HK & USA
Watch: GMTs,1803, 16610LV
Posts: 2,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
the selling price is why i thought i seemed odd. If it was me i would rather have a Rolex from the moon than a Bulova.

The Rolex auction was 6 years earlier but still that is a huge difference.
What makes the Apollo 15 Bulova unique is that it wasn't merely a personal watch taken into space or taken down the the lunar surface in the LEM like a few GMTs. That particular Bulova is the only watch besides the various Speedmasters ever worn on the lunar surface outside the LEM and outside the suit during lunar EVAs, exposed to the elements just as the Speedmasters were. The reason David Scott wore it was because after his 1st EVA he noticed his Speedmaster had popped it's crystal, so during the next 2 he used his personal watch. These EVAs included excursions on the Lunar Rover. Apparently, Scott never cleaned the watch after the mission and when it went up for sale it still had lunar dust adhering to it and the strap.

So until someone starts going to the moon again, since all Apollo mission Speedmasters were/are government issue/owned, Scott's Bulova (being a personal item), is the only watch that will ever be for sale to the public that was worn on the moon during an EVA outside a pressurized suit. No GMT ever was. That's the reason for the huge difference in auction price. With historical value-provenance like that the brand of the watch (Bulova vs. Rolex) is an insignificant consideration. A Timex or Mickey Mouse watch would have still fetched over 1.5 million more than the Rolex and that particular watch will at some point be put up for auction/sale again and will certainly command a much higher price. There is no other one-of-a-kind watch like it.

Astronauts since the Mercury program were always bringing small items of personal effects into space and bringing them back (coins, postage stamps, photographs etc) or leaving them on the moon beginning with Armstrong, who left his college fraternity pin.
CRM114 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 August 2017, 05:33 AM   #39
Rolex fan 61
"TRF" Member
 
Rolex fan 61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 1,262
Bulova made a chronograph for the moon missions too.
Rolex fan 61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 August 2017, 05:45 AM   #40
GMT Aviator
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
 
GMT Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: London
Posts: 3,290
The Bulova Dave Scott wore on the moon was a Prototype. It was put into his personal effects carried on board by a friend related to Bulova, who were keen to see an American made watch worn on the moon instead of a Swiss one.
It's ironic that this fact only came to light a few years ago when Dave Scott put it up for auction.
It also means that the countless Speedmaster pros with the inscription "The First and Only watch worn on the moon' engraved into the case back, are incorrect.
I own a Bulova like Dave Scotts and its a beautiful watch and they can be had for a steal right now. It uses a high frequency Quartz movement and after six months, its still accurate to the second! The original Bulova Moon watch, was a mechanical movement.
Bulova supplied the Apollo programme with chronometers that were used as back ups in the LEM. They were, I think, essentially large pocket watches.
GMT Aviator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 August 2017, 06:18 AM   #41
grimps
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: England
Posts: 1,420
Quote:
Originally Posted by breitlings View Post
Breitling Cosmonaut I believe may have been one of the first watches worn into space: http://forums.watchuseek.com/f39/bre...gend-4034.html IIRC the Russians also used it on one of their first missions but I am having trouble referencing that.
I was going to say .... Surely the Russians had watches in space first ?
it would be interesting to know what they was wearing
grimps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 August 2017, 06:27 AM   #42
faz
"TRF" Member
 
faz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Faz
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: like'em all
Posts: 4,655
Quote:
Originally Posted by AzHadEnuf View Post
When I was a little kid in the sixties my dad always wore a Speedmaster. After the moon landing he would say he had the same watch that went to the moon. A year or so later , after the lunar landing, the watch was lost or stolen on a family vacation. My dad tried to replace it but at the time everyone wanted and was buying the Moon Watch. With none available he finally walked into a Rolex AD and bought a 6263, with a big discount, they couldn't sell them. Had Rolex made it to the moon I'd be wearing a Speedmaster today instead of a 6263. Happy they failed the test.


Funny and cool story!
__________________
-Faz

Instagram @fazmoto
faz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 August 2017, 07:47 AM   #43
hugs
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: UK bad teeth etc
Watch: Rolex and Tudor
Posts: 1,001
Possibly because Rolex originated in Britain
hugs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado

Bernard Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.