ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

remrk · 5 December 2017, 02:56 PM

Can you guys take a look at these photos and let me know if this is authentic. Side note, the bezel does not line up with the 12 o'clock marker. Also, besides NYC RSC, are there any ADs in NJ that can authenticate the watch? Thanks.

jnkay · 5 December 2017, 03:01 PM

No bells go off for me based on its outward appearance.

SDRider · 5 December 2017, 03:13 PM

Honestly, it looks pretty good to me based on the pics. If it’s a fake, it’s a really good one.

Dusko.Popov · 5 December 2017, 03:45 PM

The triangle often times does not line up perfectly.

Look for the crown etching at the 6 o'clock position on the crystal. On fakes that crown is there but it's not the inconspicuous security feature that it's intended to be.

Also, an ad can't tell you if is a watch is authentic nor would you want them to. Some can tell you if a serial number was purchased from their ad. But most employees who work at ads don't have the expertise to authenticate a watch. In fact, I trust my knowledge of Rolex' more that I do anyone at most ads.

But the watch doesn't stand out from those pics.

The only thing that I would question is the inner clasp "Rolex" design. I thought the darkened script was on the textured inner clasp. That one looks smooth. I thought the text was a white script. Could be wrong though. Maybe someone with a 116713ln can chime in.

Andad · 5 December 2017, 04:10 PM

Nice one.

Looks just like mine and all good to me.

The lighting has affected the script reflection.

To me the best confirmation us the NR cyclop and the date wheel.

And the hand stack of course.

crowncollection · 5 December 2017, 04:45 PM

Looks good

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ttnpb · 5 December 2017, 05:08 PM

Genuine.

joli160 · 5 December 2017, 07:00 PM

Looks good

rgwarden · 5 December 2017, 07:08 PM

The only way you can be sure is to see the movement. We all know this. Fakes are getting so good.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

prozac51 · 6 December 2017, 12:54 AM

Looks exactly like the real one I used to have.

If the bezel rotates smoothly in 2.5min clicks and the hour jumps when you adjust it at the 2nd crown pull position, it's leaning towards genuine.

Sent from my HTC_2Q4D100 using Tapatalk

bayerische · 6 December 2017, 01:38 AM

Looks good to me.

remrk · 6 December 2017, 02:40 AM

Thanks guys! I’ll take it in to Rolex RSC in NYC when I get the chance just to be 100 percent certain.

ttnpb · 6 December 2017, 02:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgwarden

The only way you can be sure is to see the movement. We all know this. Fakes are getting so good.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We dont all know this.

A genuine 31xx movement is just a genuine movements. Seen plenty of fake stuff with real movements.

rgwarden · 6 December 2017, 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ttnpb

We dont all know this.

A genuine 31xx movement is just a genuine movements. Seen plenty of fake stuff with real movements.

Really? That’s kind of terrifying.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

remrk · 6 December 2017, 04:26 AM

That is terrifying.

The movement has the jumping hour and date. Thanks guys, I’ll still have Rolex RSC in NYC check it out when I get the chance to be 100% certain.

ttnpb · 6 December 2017, 05:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgwarden

Really? That’s kind of terrifying.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthre...=3186+movement

Sure. I've seen clone 3135 movements, with added parts converting it to 3186, placed into a "aftermarket" case.

You · 6 December 2017, 07:22 AM

Looks good

5 December 2017, 04:10 PM	#5
Andad 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Eddie Location: Australia Watch: A few. Posts: 36,927	Nice one. Looks just like mine and all good to me. The lighting has affected the script reflection. To me the best confirmation us the NR cyclop and the date wheel. And the hand stack of course. __________________ E

5 December 2017, 04:45 PM	#6
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,165	Looks good Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ watches many

5 December 2017, 07:00 PM	#8
joli160 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: NL Watch: Yachtmaster Posts: 14,431	Looks good __________________ Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.

6 December 2017, 01:38 AM	#11
bayerische "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Andreas Location: Margaritaville Watch: Smurf Posts: 19,879	Looks good to me. __________________ Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

5 December 2017, 03:01 PM	#2
jnkay "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: South Florida, US Watch: du jour Posts: 1,812	No bells go off for me based on its outward appearance.

5 December 2017, 03:13 PM	#3
SDRider Banned Join Date: May 2017 Real Name: Julian Location: San Diego, CA Watch: Rolex 116613LB Posts: 1,908	Honestly, it looks pretty good to me based on the pics. If it’s a fake, it’s a really good one.

5 December 2017, 03:45 PM	#4
Dusko.Popov "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2015 Location: DC Posts: 829	The triangle often times does not line up perfectly. Look for the crown etching at the 6 o'clock position on the crystal. On fakes that crown is there but it's not the inconspicuous security feature that it's intended to be. Also, an ad can't tell you if is a watch is authentic nor would you want them to. Some can tell you if a serial number was purchased from their ad. But most employees who work at ads don't have the expertise to authenticate a watch. In fact, I trust my knowledge of Rolex' more that I do anyone at most ads. But the watch doesn't stand out from those pics. The only thing that I would question is the inner clasp "Rolex" design. I thought the darkened script was on the textured inner clasp. That one looks smooth. I thought the text was a white script. Could be wrong though. Maybe someone with a 116713ln can chime in.

5 December 2017, 05:08 PM	#7
ttnpb "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: So Cal Watch: 16803 Posts: 144	Genuine.

5 December 2017, 07:08 PM	#9
rgwarden "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: London Watch: 124270 Posts: 535	The only way you can be sure is to see the movement. We all know this. Fakes are getting so good. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

6 December 2017, 12:54 AM	#10
prozac51 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2017 Location: Singapore Posts: 131	Looks exactly like the real one I used to have. If the bezel rotates smoothly in 2.5min clicks and the hour jumps when you adjust it at the 2nd crown pull position, it's leaning towards genuine. Sent from my HTC_2Q4D100 using Tapatalk

6 December 2017, 02:40 AM	#12
remrk "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: NJ Watch: 116500LN Posts: 128	Thanks guys! I’ll take it in to Rolex RSC in NYC when I get the chance just to be 100 percent certain.

6 December 2017, 04:26 AM	#15
remrk "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: NJ Watch: 116500LN Posts: 128	That is terrifying. The movement has the jumping hour and date. Thanks guys, I’ll still have Rolex RSC in NYC check it out when I get the chance to be 100% certain.

6 December 2017, 07:22 AM	#17
You "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2016 Location: Beverly Hills, CA Watch: Platinum Daytona Posts: 785	Looks good

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)