ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 October 2008, 08:06 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
|
Rolex Springbar Removal Tool
Is it the same size both for bracelet removal and the micro adjustment/comfort link on the newer bracelet/clasps? looks the same
http://www.agtshop.co.uk/acatalog/Bracelet_Tools.html thanks steve |
27 October 2008, 10:25 PM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Member 202♛
Posts: 1,811
|
You want something that looks like this...
What has become my absolute favorite tool for removing Rolex bracelets is the Bergeon 6825. This tool slides both sides of the springbar simultaneously such that you are not playing see-saw with the springbar. The standard tips that are included with the tool are a little too wide. I ground them down slightly to fit inside a Rolex solid end link (SEL). Althouth Otto Frei indicates that this tool will not work with Rolex bracelets, a simple filing of the tips makes this the preferred tool for removing SEL bracelets. This tool is pricey, but if you are going to be removing Rolex bracelets, it is well worth the cost for Swiss precision and less cursing at yourself for creating scratches from removing or reinstalling the bracelet. I have more information posted at http://www.minus4plus6.com/maintenance.htm#removal -Sheldon
__________________
|
28 October 2008, 01:01 AM | #3 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,170
|
As Sheldon says, you need to have very narrow ends on your spring-bar removal tool for a Rolex. The "spade end" of many cheaper models is much too wide for anything but a leather strap.
There are many models that will work, here I use a Bergeon 6111 to remove a bracelet. This tool has an end that has the punch end for removing lug holes bracelets removeable, you can then reverse it and re-install this v-groove end for bracelets..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
28 October 2008, 01:10 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
|
Quote:
Thanks steve http://www.watchtool.co.uk/bergeon-6...ol-p-6725.html |
|
28 October 2008, 04:52 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Ashutosh
Location: Rochester NY
Watch: Daytonas,SD
Posts: 2,342
|
Quote:
__________________
Everything becomes nothing after ROLEX 116520 SS Daytona White Dial 116520 SS Daytona Black Dial 116523 18K&SS Daytona Slate Dial 16600 Sea-Dweller 16710 GMT Master II Pepsi Bezel 16613 18K&SS Submariner Blue Dial 116660 Deepsea Sea-Dweller |
|
28 October 2008, 05:44 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: MI
Watch: Tudor Chrono
Posts: 75
|
As far as I am concerned, the way Sheldon describes is the only way for someone who is not doing this all the time. I own a 6111, but professionally I use a tool like sheldon described from Rolex. Keep those lugs scratch free!
|
28 October 2008, 06:52 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England
Watch: 16613 16710 16600
Posts: 1,021
|
Hi, When the standard forks are filed down is the idea to make them as small as the thin forks?
Are the thin FF forks a perfect fit of do they need to be a bit bigger? In other words which do I order for the best job of all!!?? Thank you very much, PeterT |
28 October 2008, 07:13 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Ashutosh
Location: Rochester NY
Watch: Daytonas,SD
Posts: 2,342
|
hey Peter, the fine forks fit perfectly and they need not be any bigger so the fine forks would be best of all.
__________________
Everything becomes nothing after ROLEX 116520 SS Daytona White Dial 116520 SS Daytona Black Dial 116523 18K&SS Daytona Slate Dial 16600 Sea-Dweller 16710 GMT Master II Pepsi Bezel 16613 18K&SS Submariner Blue Dial 116660 Deepsea Sea-Dweller |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.