ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 October 2008, 11:00 AM | #1 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,180
|
Is A Rolex Really Better ???
These discussions always seem to get out of hand and folks start saying that just because one movement is capable of meeting the COSC standard, then it must be just as good as any other movement that can meet the same standard..
They cite this as proof that "their" movement is as good as another, and then say they have a better clasp, so that their watch is overall "better". Or they say that their clear case back shows some nice designs and evidence of superior workmanship,(we're not sure superior to what) therefore it is "better". This shows no understanding in what makes the watch tick.... So.........let's talk about what makes a Rolex movement actually better, from an engineering perspective, than others.. 1. All Rolex movements have a full balance bridge. This adds stability and superior support to the balance which is the brains of your movement. Many others do not. 2. Rolex uses screw locks to hold the movement in the case...no clips, no bend tabs...solid mounting.. it won't move around in the case. 3. Free sprung balance. This allows free movement of the hairspring and it is not attached, or anchored to a regulator screw, but rather the balance wheel is timed by actually adjusting the inertia of the wheel (balance screws, kind of like balancing your car wheels) itself rather than just adjusting the length of the spring 4. Breguet over-coil hairspring. This is known to help the watch keep more consistent time as the mainspring unwinds so the watch is accurate over a broader range of power from the traditional flat-spring used in other makes. 5. 31 jeweled movements as a standard so jewels are at all wear points rather than 23, 25, or 27 as found in many other high end watches. 6. 10mm balance wheels. More mass equals more stability and more consistent operation during use. It is much more difficult to disturb the heavier mass of a Rolex balance wheel than it is on the typical 9mm balance wheel of other watches. 7. Teflon coated reverser wheels for smooth and quiet, lifetime operation. 8. A removable and easy to disassemble reverser module for easy cleaning rather than a fixed and riveted module as used in some others. 9. Rolex uses additional gearing to run the center seconds which results in a slightly thicker movement, but one that is stronger and more stable. 10. Cam, jewel, and spring actuation of the date change function. This allows you to change the date in a Rolex at any time, without issue, because the date change function is disassociated from the hand stack gears. Many other movements will be broken if you change the date between 9pm and 3am. It also snaps the date over instantaneously. I'll stop here before you fall asleep.... But I will say.............This is why my Rolex is better than your XXXXX watch..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
28 October 2008, 11:07 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Earth
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 448
|
Hey that's great Larry.
Thanks for the great info. This lends testimony and good reference to all those Rolex haters who claim that their Walmart casio is just as good if not better than Rolex. |
28 October 2008, 11:09 AM | #3 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 116710 BLNR
Posts: 34,358
|
Those are some interesting details.
I've seen you around the boards, Larry. Whence comes all this esoterica? |
28 October 2008, 11:12 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Joshua
Location: Syracuse, NY
Watch: LV C
Posts: 2,204
|
Excellent information Larry. I enjoyed reading every morsel of it.
|
28 October 2008, 11:13 AM | #5 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
ZZZZZZzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZ
Great info
__________________
GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN |
28 October 2008, 11:15 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
|
That's all very interesting, but I hear that they don't keep very good time.
|
28 October 2008, 11:24 AM | #7 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,180
|
But they don't keep it, better than many other brands............
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
28 October 2008, 11:33 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: Air-King 114200
Posts: 2,878
|
my only criticism is the lack of ball bearings at the rotor pivot (cal. 4130 excepted). better? better than what?
robust, accurate, easily serviced, sure. |
28 October 2008, 11:35 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Great info. From my side, the perception of Rolex is better. For me, that's enough !
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
28 October 2008, 11:39 AM | #10 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
Great stuff, Larry.
Could you please elaborate #8 - haven't understood a word. Some pics, if possible. Thanks - JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
28 October 2008, 11:48 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: BC, Canada
Watch: EXP II
Posts: 545
|
Good to know, thanks for taking the time to share.
I'm with JJ on #8 and to be honest on one or two other items mentioned but I'll work those out in time...........most makes sense to me. Thanks again |
28 October 2008, 11:54 AM | #12 |
Facilitator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,270
|
These Rolex watches simply have appeal.
The watch has a standard of quality that in some ways what many of us would strive to achieve in our personal aspects of life. In other aspects the watch provides a level of deep satisfaction. Maybe this sense of satisfaction isn't just from the watch but to some extent from marketing, the stories of others and our own personal experiences with a very personal possession.
__________________
Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim |
28 October 2008, 12:17 PM | #13 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,180
|
Quote:
This sits on top of the movement and as the weight swings either way, it "reverses" to provide winding of the watch in either direction. It is completely disassemble-able for cleaning and repairs. and the red color is the teflon coating that makes it run smoothly, dependably, and quietly.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
28 October 2008, 12:18 PM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex/Breitling/BR
Posts: 200
|
Larry, you are well versed on many fronts !!! Knowledge is King.
Regards |
28 October 2008, 12:28 PM | #15 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
Quote:
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
28 October 2008, 12:28 PM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
|
Thanks for all the info, Larry!
And I though a watch was just a watch. Fr. John+ |
28 October 2008, 12:33 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
Great info Larry!
|
28 October 2008, 12:49 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 4,624
|
Wow. Very informative. Thanks for sharing. Posts like this one is one of the reasons TRF is the best.
|
28 October 2008, 01:18 PM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Richard
Location: USA
Watch: YM Deep Space
Posts: 12,506
|
This is a keeper!!!
__________________
Rolex Yacht-Master 40mm (SS-YG / Deep Space MOP) 16623 Breitling Aerospace Titanium / 18K with UTC. Omega Speedmaster 3510.50 Oris TT1 Pro Diver Regulator 43MM |
28 October 2008, 04:08 PM | #20 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: land down under
Watch: you? "YES PLEASE"!
Posts: 3,685
|
Doesn't it just tell the time!
__________________
it's not just about telling the time... happy rolexing... I'm just a man with a passion
|
28 October 2008, 04:12 PM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Dom
Location: Melbourne
Watch: Sub 16610
Posts: 153
|
Quote:
__________________
- Rolex Daytona White 116520 - Rolex Submariner 16610 - Rolex Datejust II tt w/gold romans - Breitling Chronomat Evolution SS - Omega Seamaster Professional |
|
28 October 2008, 04:14 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Fullerton, CA
Watch: GMT Master II
Posts: 916
|
wow i feel even better after reading this, thanks!
|
28 October 2008, 04:28 PM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 101
|
Great info...
Just wanna add on to the first point, I know majority of Rolex owners thought Rolex invented and used the full balance bridge... The truth is Rolex is not the first watch company that comes out with full balance bridge... Seiko and Citizen did that in the 50s and 60s... We Rolex-er be humble... |
28 October 2008, 04:33 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: thailand / m'sia
Watch: YG DD & GMT,TT SUB
Posts: 1,265
|
very informative... thanks
__________________
Present Collections TT Date-just, TT Sub. (Bluesy), YG Date-Date, YG GMT IIc (Black dial). SS GMT IIc |
28 October 2008, 08:11 PM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Troy
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Watch: Tudor Sub. 7928
Posts: 1,275
|
Good post
|
28 October 2008, 08:19 PM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: dan
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: keystone pocket
Posts: 5,915
|
thanks, excellent information!
|
29 October 2008, 09:12 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 2
|
Thanks for share!Great !!!
|
29 October 2008, 09:56 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago IL
Watch: Platinum DDMasterp
Posts: 1,983
|
Rolex has been and wil always be my Number 1 Watch
__________________
Men's Platinum Day Date Masterpiece Men's 18k Day Date Crown Collection Men's Franck Muller 18k Conquistador Cortez Men's SS Cartier Pasha MEMBER # 5534 USA CHICAGO IL |
29 October 2008, 10:11 AM | #29 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Robert
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: Sea-dweller Z ser.
Posts: 67
|
Thanks lots, Larry for this info, I appreciate getting technical info like this.. Many thanks again.
|
29 October 2008, 10:32 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Gary
Location: GMT-6
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,350
|
Larry,
I'm just having problems visualizing a free sprung balance if you could say some more? Also, you can add microsteller adjustment to the list. Many of the points you made are why I chose a Rolex movement but not being technical I don't know how important they are. Point 4 seems to be very important to performance but does a full balance bridge really make any difference? I always compare my Rolex 3135 to my Omega 1128. The Rolex should be a more consistent time keeper - it has a better design. But will it make any practical difference? So far, there is no difference in performance. I do know that the Omega will not keep to COSC if left to unwind and it will be interesting to test the Rolex here - I suspect it will do better. One thing's for sure, you can't ever go wrong with a Rolex movement.
__________________
Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.