ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

enjoythemusic · 1 May 2020, 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bmw1

It’s 36mm *41mm

Ahh ok. Looks really small on the wrist pic. Still a pass, keep the DD and OMEGA imho OP.

Ksporty · 1 May 2020, 12:12 PM

Nah, I think you'd regret doing that trade. You’d be giving up a lot of versatility losing those references. Not for that PP.

Y4U · 1 May 2020, 12:19 PM

Personally I wouldn’t do that trade, No paperwork would put me off that deal even more.

James Madsen · 1 May 2020, 12:27 PM

It’s a tough one imo despite the overwhelming majority seem to be against this trade.. From a value perspective it doesn’t seem like a bad trade as such though and if you prefer the Patek maybe it’s the right deal for you. I do love the DD though. Hard to beat WG!

What are the three watches valued at?

wrxsti · 1 May 2020, 12:30 PM

not for that Patek

mackychase · 1 May 2020, 12:30 PM

In these types of deals, the fact that I was even "offered" any sort of trade, I would be suspicious.

Auto red flag. Don't take it.

P.S.: the date window on this Patek looks awkward.

gt.gee · 1 May 2020, 12:39 PM

dddl · 1 May 2020, 12:43 PM

To me it is simple ... NO WAY!

214270Explorer · 1 May 2020, 12:44 PM

Having both the number and date at 3 o'clock make that ugly PP even more laughable.

Which is likely why it is being traded off?

Thekingstaystheking7 · 1 May 2020, 12:58 PM

Day date looks 10 times better than the Patek in my opinion

RXAPPP · 1 May 2020, 01:00 PM

If u already have a Patek and the trade would leave you without a rolex then no I wouldn’t do it

johnorpheus · 1 May 2020, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James Madsen

It’s a tough one imo despite the overwhelming majority seem to be against this trade.. From a value perspective it doesn’t seem like a bad trade as such though and if you prefer the Patek maybe it’s the right deal for you. I do love the DD though. Hard to beat WG!

What are the three watches valued at?

It’s this type of perspective that likely has OP considering giving up two beauties for whatever that Patek is suppose to be. Good lord, this isn’t just a balance line on an account. OP would have to actually wear that thing.

Onikage · 1 May 2020, 01:06 PM

I'm all for men wearing smaller watches but it's the ladies one. Even if it was the gents I couldn't throw Presidents at what was pretty much the entry level Patek a few years ago.

vman · 1 May 2020, 01:57 PM

Not for that Patek. That reference # is one of the ugliest models.

fwhawk · 1 May 2020, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Onikage

I'm all for men wearing smaller watches but it's the ladies one. Even if it was the gents I couldn't throw Presidents at what was pretty much the entry level Patek a few years ago.

You may not like the Patek, but it was originally sold as a men's watch.

Vanmarsenille · 1 May 2020, 02:02 PM

Onikage · 1 May 2020, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fwhawk

You may not like the Patek, but it was originally sold as a men's watch.

I'm aware of that. And I don't mind it. Patek has designated it as the ladies one by styling the modern ladies lineup after it.

Roli4life · 1 May 2020, 02:43 PM

Tell him to come back with a 5164A.

danwang0520 · 1 May 2020, 03:06 PM

i wouldn't, personally, for that reference

watchshot94 · 1 May 2020, 03:34 PM

Are you the one with the Patek?

campfire · 1 May 2020, 04:06 PM

Nope

DoDe · 1 May 2020, 04:12 PM

This is a great deal. For the owner of the Patek.

kpinthebay · 1 May 2020, 04:12 PM

No way...hell I wouldn't even trade just the DD for that PP.

Oh...see what I did there.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

Milsub114060 · 1 May 2020, 04:16 PM

For that piece don’t be silly

just1time · 1 May 2020, 04:25 PM

Two Words: EN...OH

Rogdogg · 1 May 2020, 04:28 PM

I would keep what you have.

Louis (Toronto) · 1 May 2020, 05:21 PM

Nope

Kirsty87 · 1 May 2020, 05:23 PM

I can't wait for reality to set in, and the Aquanaut hype to die down. It is NOT a pretty watch.

Gerardus · 1 May 2020, 05:25 PM

Nope

myporsche · 1 May 2020, 05:37 PM

I wouldn't even do it for a newer Aquanaut

1 May 2020, 12:30 PM	#35
wrxsti "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Earth Posts: 1,694	not for that Patek __________________ PP Geneva

1 May 2020, 12:43 PM	#38
dddl 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: Conshohocken Watch: What? Posts: 825	To me it is simple ... NO WAY! __________________ dive deep dive long 1503 16263 16610 228238 16623

1 May 2020, 12:44 PM	#39
214270Explorer "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2018 Location: United States Watch: me buy Watches Posts: 3,955	Having both the number and date at 3 o'clock make that ugly PP even more laughable. Which is likely why it is being traded off? __________________ “The display of actual intelligence terrifies much of mankind” Rolex "some" Tudor "some" Damasko "some" Misc Pieces "some" Marathon "some" GS Spring Drive "some" Hamilton "some" Findeisen "some"

1 May 2020, 01:06 PM	#43
Onikage "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: England Watch: 16710, 16628 Posts: 7,757	I'm all for men wearing smaller watches but it's the ladies one. Even if it was the gents I couldn't throw Presidents at what was pretty much the entry level Patek a few years ago. __________________ GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4

1 May 2020, 01:57 PM	#44
vman "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Capt Swerve Location: North Carolina Watch: less TV Posts: 2,224	Not for that Patek. That reference # is one of the ugliest models. __________________ Collector and buyer of Lange, VC, Patek \| 2 FA Enabled

1 May 2020, 12:12 PM	#32
Ksporty "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: SC Posts: 266	Nah, I think you'd regret doing that trade. You’d be giving up a lot of versatility losing those references. Not for that PP.

1 May 2020, 12:19 PM	#33
Y4U "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2020 Location: UK Posts: 33	Personally I wouldn’t do that trade, No paperwork would put me off that deal even more.

1 May 2020, 12:27 PM	#34
James Madsen "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2018 Real Name: JM Location: USA Watch: es Posts: 83	It’s a tough one imo despite the overwhelming majority seem to be against this trade.. From a value perspective it doesn’t seem like a bad trade as such though and if you prefer the Patek maybe it’s the right deal for you. I do love the DD though. Hard to beat WG! What are the three watches valued at?

1 May 2020, 12:30 PM	#36
mackychase "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2019 Real Name: Mac Location: Philippines Watch: Hmm.. Posts: 70	In these types of deals, the fact that I was even "offered" any sort of trade, I would be suspicious. Auto red flag. Don't take it. P.S.: the date window on this Patek looks awkward.

1 May 2020, 12:39 PM	#37
gt.gee "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2020 Location: Bangkok, Thailand Posts: 13

1 May 2020, 12:58 PM	#40
Thekingstaystheking7 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2019 Location: London Watch: AP Royal Oak Posts: 25	Day date looks 10 times better than the Patek in my opinion

1 May 2020, 01:00 PM	#41
RXAPPP "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Blue Planet Watch: 5 Posts: 1,201	If u already have a Patek and the trade would leave you without a rolex then no I wouldn’t do it

1 May 2020, 02:02 PM	#46
Vanmarsenille "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: FLA Posts: 401

1 May 2020, 02:43 PM	#48
Roli4life "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2018 Posts: 1,079	Tell him to come back with a 5164A.

1 May 2020, 03:06 PM	#49
danwang0520 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Real Name: Daniel Location: Taipei, Taiwan Watch: my signature Posts: 2,671	i wouldn't, personally, for that reference

1 May 2020, 03:34 PM	#50
watchshot94 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2019 Location: Here Watch: DJ 36 Posts: 156	Are you the one with the Patek?

1 May 2020, 04:06 PM	#51
campfire "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Location: here Posts: 2,104	Nope

1 May 2020, 04:12 PM	#52
DoDe "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Norway Posts: 628	This is a great deal. For the owner of the Patek.

1 May 2020, 04:12 PM	#53
kpinthebay "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Rolex Location: SF Bay Area Watch: Sub 16610 or dads Posts: 208	No way...hell I wouldn't even trade just the DD for that PP. Oh...see what I did there. Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk __________________ 16610 \| 16570 \| 116200 \| 18038 - from my pop RIP

1 May 2020, 04:16 PM	#54
Milsub114060 Banned Join Date: Apr 2020 Location: London Posts: 111	For that piece don’t be silly

1 May 2020, 04:25 PM	#55
just1time "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2018 Location: toRonTo, oN, Posts: 594	Two Words: EN...OH

1 May 2020, 04:28 PM	#56
Rogdogg 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Bangkok Posts: 6,123	I would keep what you have. __________________ Nil Satis Nisi Optimum

1 May 2020, 05:21 PM	#57
Louis (Toronto) "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Canada Watch: Yachtmaster & SubC Posts: 641	Nope __________________ Rolex 16622 Platinum dial, Rolex Sub Date 116610 LN, Rolex Daytona 116500 LN Black dial, Rolex Daytona 116500 LN White dial

1 May 2020, 05:23 PM	#58
Kirsty87 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2020 Location: UK Watch: Day Date 36mm Posts: 157	I can't wait for reality to set in, and the Aquanaut hype to die down. It is NOT a pretty watch.

1 May 2020, 05:25 PM	#59
Gerardus "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Gerardus Location: EU Watch: ♕ Posts: 11,927	Nope __________________ ♕16570 ♕126610 ♕126333

1 May 2020, 05:37 PM	#60
myporsche "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: LA<>NY Watch: Rolex♠Lange Posts: 2,277	I wouldn't even do it for a newer Aquanaut

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)