Which collection would you rather have?

[JRell]

3 like the BLNR much more than the snoopy.

[996marty]

I’d go for option #3

[YoyoGift8]

I’ll go for option 1.

[triple.lindy]

3


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[rapide66]

#1

[Kenny G]

Given these choices, #1.

[sofmore]

Collection no 1

[fskywalker]

3


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[BobbyD2323]

3 easy.

[Turbo Racer]

1

[DocHorton]

Daytona, BLNR, Kermit.

[Commandopat]

1

[Rolex2008]

Originally Posted by Babalaas

Not feeling my black no date sub (124060, felt the black bezel was too boring) and my Zenith Chronomaster Sport (love the design but sits too thick). Thus, thinking of trading plus some money on top. Which collection would you rather have?

1: Ed White 321 Speedmaster, Rolex Pepsi 126710 BLRO, Daytona White 116500ln

OR

2). Ed White 321 Speedmaster, Rolex Pepsi 126710 BLRO, Submariner Kermit 126610LV, Snoopy 50th anniversary

OR

3). Ed White 321 Speedmaster, Rolex Pepsi 126710 BLRO, Submariner Kermit 126610LV, 126710 BLNR Batman (Pepsi is on jubilee)

For me, a collection only needs to have one of each variant. So no need for 2 chronos or 2 GMTs, just unnecessary overlap IMO.

I’d much prefer a Diver, GMT, Chrono and a field watch and done.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Greenwood_]

Sub LV
BLRO
3861 speedy (ed white isn’t worth it for me)
Daytona (white dial)

[Wilco68]

None of those full lists tbh.

If a number 4) was just the Daytona & the Snoopy, that would get my vote.

[knighty88]

Number 3 for me, although each to their own.

[Agamemnon]

1

[APGuru]

Hmm, I have a similar preference for 2 & 3. However, the final entry in each list seems redundant. I'd suggest removing that and opting for a non-chrono option without a rotating bezel, maybe something along the lines of a DJ, Exp I, OP, and so on.

[travisb]

#2 but I'd choose only one of the two chronos.

[yesnaya]

#2 but replace snoopy with white 116500

[Babalaas]

Originally Posted by yesnaya

#2 but replace snoopy with white 116500

Thanks but they would be out of the budget. The point of having these 3 collection options is that the net new watches (either the Daytona standalone or the Kermit + Snoopy Combo or Kermit + Batman Combo) all cost in the same ballpark in current grey prices

[jjnd08]

1

[NachoNeal]

Originally Posted by Babalaas

Not feeling my black no date sub (124060, felt the black bezel was too boring) and my Zenith Chronomaster Sport (love the design but sits too thick). Thus, thinking of trading plus some money on top. Which collection would you rather have?

1: Ed White 321 Speedmaster, Rolex Pepsi 126710 BLRO, Daytona White 116500ln

OR

2). Ed White 321 Speedmaster, Rolex Pepsi 126710 BLRO, Submariner Kermit 126610LV, Snoopy 50th anniversary

OR

3). Ed White 321 Speedmaster, Rolex Pepsi 126710 BLRO, Submariner Kermit 126610LV, 126710 BLNR Batman (Pepsi is on jubilee)

#3 without green.

[rmlovett1]

Of your choices…..#1

[Onequik135i]

I would go w 1, & if you do opt for a sub I would ditch the boring black sub & go w a nice full set 116610LV instead.

[twinfo]

Collection 1

[kane818]

number 1 without a doubt

[illiguy]

1 by a country mile

[georgew]

Originally Posted by JRell

3 like the BLNR much more than the snoopy.

this for me too

[mario1971]

No. 1, but instead of Ed White 321 I would take 116610LV (Hulk). 2 Chronographs in such a small collection are one too much.

Oh, exactly such three.