Why does anyone buy a Tudor?

[Dan Pierce]

Originally Posted by impalass

Never heard of anyone having to explain their Tudor is a Rolex, or made by Rolex for that matter.

Tudor's have been available in Canada forever and bow to no watch, in fact in their price range they can't be beat imo.

In regards to movements did'nt Swatch recently commit to continue suppling Tudor indefinitely inspite of their current plans to restrict ETA's ?

Yes.
dP

[Cabaiguan]

This OP is a classic case of someone caring more for the brand on the dial than the watch itself.

Tudors are fantastic watches in their own right. I don't see why one would even need to compare them to Rolex. Their designs and styling are very different.

[Dan Pierce]

Originally Posted by ecsub44

Why/when would you ever have to "explain" what it is???

Person: "That's a nice watch."
Me: "Thank you."
Person: "Do you mind if I ask what brand it is?"
Me: "Not at all. It's a Tudor."
Person: "I've never heard of that."
Me: "They're great watches."
Person: "Thanks. Have a great day."
Me: "Good day."

Tudor watches are amazing watches at a great price. It fits a niche where people don't want to spend so much money on a Rolex, but want something of similar quality, styling, and history.

This might be the rule for the average watch buyer but a WIS is much more interested in a chrono w/ a date function offering a variety of bezels and bracelets, ss blue Subs, and all the other features offered by Tudor and not Rolex.
dP

[Lol-x]

Tudor have some great models from the old Snowflake and Chronos to the modern pieces released and to be released.

I am really looking forward to holding the Pelagos when it is released, a 42mm titanium case with snowflake dial.

[Johnny Fever]

Well said, my Brother.

[EE33]

Originally Posted by coopster9

@EE33, have you owned a tudor and be treated like 2nd class? If you havent (judging by the watches you indicated on your avatar), keep your comments to yourself and lets not involve others who may or may not agree with either

I've owned a Tudor and lesser watches, I've also never felt inferior. Your attitude must draw that kind of magic to make you feel like a 2nd class person.
FYI, I lived in Singapore in the 70's and 80's. What you generate is what you get back, classic example what you've demonstrated here

[Cabaiguan]

I don't have a dog in this fight but I really don't see how your comment was offensive. I get your point...the same people who don't understand why a Tudor is picked over a Rolex are the same who don't think twice about choosing alternatives in other lifestyle choices, namely, beat up boxers. Lol. Strange analogy, but not offensive, IMO.

Btw, posting a personal PM from admin on a public forum is a no-no. Explain it to them in PMs. They may not have grasped the intent of your OP.

[up2nogood]

I really don't understand why people call Tudor 'poor man's Rolex' or compare it directly to Rolex.

We all know that Tudor is a watch brand/manufacturer in its own right. Yes, it shares some proprietary items with Rolex, although less now than it once did.

As for movements, Tudor is one of the watch companies that has never pretended it didn't fit ETA movements. They never tried to pass them off as their own, which is in stark contrast to Oris, Tag, some Breitlings, Panerais, etc. So Swatch/ETA was never gunning for Tudor as a result. If they do start to produce their own movement, more power to them.

As for why would you buy one, well why would you buy any watch? Simply, because you like the design and appreciate the workmanship that went into getting it onto your wrist.

If criticism of Tudor stems from snobbery, or simply appreciating the pinnacle of horological design, then you'd better forget Rolex and get on to spending $1m plus on some truly spectacular pieces from VC, PP, etc.

[Monte Cristo]

Originally Posted by Cabaiguan

I don't have a dog in this fight but I really don't see how your comment was offensive. I get your point...the same people who don't understand why a Tudor is picked over a Rolex are the same who don't think twice about choosing alternatives in other lifestyle choices, namely, beat up boxers. Lol. Strange analogy, but not offensive, IMO.

Btw, posting a personal PM from admin on a public forum is a no-no. Explain it to them in PMs. They may not have grasped the intent of your OP.

I think you will find (or maybe not anymore) that the offensive comment has now been removed from this thread by the Mod.

[jay1988]

Erm why would you compare them to Rolex ? If anyone asked what it was I would just say "it's a Tudor, they are really good watches". The end. I have no plans to buy a Tudor but that's simply because there are a lot of watches I prefer and I'd rather save up for one of them. If someone gave me one I would happily fit it into my rotation. Even when I get my Patek.

There are many members on this forum who have Tudor to go with their collections of very expensive watches. Fremstar (I hope he doesn't mind me mentioning him) has a Tudor Heritage chronograph to go with his impressive collection which has two Pateks in it as well.

People buy Tudor because they are great watches, not because they are looking for a budget Rolex.

[byeedo]

Originally Posted by coopster9

I am not kidding, its not at you personally but more towards that kind of mindset.

Likewise, I am just as curious why folks would wear undies with holes when they can afford a Rolex?

I agree. I'm now off to my dresser to check that I don't fall into this category!

[93 Turbo]

Why? Because there different!

[Knappo 1307]

I'm wearing a Pam 127 (Fiddy) right now and no underwear, what does that make me?

[byeedo]

I really like the classic tudors a well as their new dive watches and wouldbuy them on their merits alone. The history and fact they are related to Rolex is just a bonus in my opinion.

[1675-David]

Originally Posted by Knappo 1307

I'm wearing a Pam 127 (Fiddy) right now and no underwear, what does that make me?

I'm shocked!!!

[Cabaiguan]

Originally Posted by Monte Cristo

I think you will find (or maybe not anymore) that the offensive comment has now been removed from this thread by the Mod.

Ah! Shame on me...didn't have the full picture. Thanks for the clarification.

[up2nogood]

Originally Posted by Knappo 1307

I'm wearing a Pam 127 (Fiddy) right now and no underwear, what does that make me?

Disturbing?

[harry in montreal]

why? because some of their watches are nicer looking (snowflake), more useful (chrono with a date) and cheaper than their rolex cousins.

i suppose if you dont get it, you are not alone. some people just dont understand.

[coopster9]

Originally Posted by Monte Cristo

I think you will find (or maybe not anymore) that the offensive comment has now been removed from this thread by the Mod.

Correction, the so called offensive comment was re-edited by me before the 5mins grace was up but pelon was replying concurrently as I was editing.

the original comment was, i found his statement too asian like, akin to my fellow countrymen who think tudors are poor man's rolexes.

reason for editing it? I thot the underwear analogy would strike a better cord.

[2th Dr]

Tudors are the shiznit!!! End of story! Unless you've owned one, you just won't get it.

[beshannon]

Originally Posted by pelon

...I realize I'm kinda new, why would anyone buy a Tudor?

Because they like it?

Change your question to "why would anyone buy a ________________?"

Personal choice

[coopster9]

Originally Posted by EE33

I've owned a Tudor and lesser watches, I've also never felt inferior. Your attitude must draw that kind of magic to make you feel like a 2nd class person.
FYI, I lived in Singapore in the 70's and 80's. What you generate is what you get back, classic example what you've demonstrated here

@ EE33, who is talking about feeling inferior? Being treated like 2nd class and feeling inferior are 2 different matters. BTW, who's interested about when and where you live? Lets get back to the thread issue.

[impalass]

Why ?...............In the 70's I owned a Tudor Blue Snow Flake and flipped it for a Rolex Submariner (5513) and have experienced sellers remorse for close to 40 years. (OCD anyone?)

The "Tudor Heritage Black Bay" will help me forget my foolishness all those years ago .............. Thats why. :)

[Spunga]

As a side note, there is a very nice (free) iPad app called "Tudor New 2012 Watches" on the Apple app store.

[Frogman4me]

Tudor like Rolex is filled with great history, design and proven quality. For me personally I really enjoy Tudor watches sometimes even more than Rolex watches. I went from 4 rolexes and 1 Tudor to 5 Tudors to 1 Rolex and I am considering selling my last one. For me explaining why would I spend so much money on a Rolex watch is more of a hassle then explaining what a Tudor is. I prefer to be under the radar so a Tudor is prefect for me as I still get all the qualities and history of a Rolex watch without the often negative reputation of a Rolex owner. Mind you this is when a non watch guy comments on a Rolex, which is most of the time.

[coopster9]

check this out...

http://www.yankodesign.com/2012/05/2...sor-black-bay/

"Apparently Black Bay will also come with one of their now trademark cotton ribbon style straps!"

= nato?

Originally Posted by impalass

Why ?...............In the 70's I owned a Tudor Blue Snow Flake and flipped it for a Rolex Submariner (5513) and have experienced sellers remorse for close to 40 years. (OCD anyone?)

The "Tudor Heritage Black Bay" will help me forget my foolishness all those years ago .............. Thats why. :)

Padi edit
Seeing that you posted a private PM from a mod in open forum which is not the correct thing to do.You already have a 5 point infraction so I will add 6 more bye.

[EE33]

Originally Posted by coopster9

@ EE33, who is talking about feeling inferior? Being treated like 2nd class and feeling inferior are 2 different matters. BTW, who's interested about when and where you live? Lets get back to the thread issue.

The Singaporean attitude & being 2nd class for what you wear (Tudor) is what you stated in your initial post which was edited by a Mod, hence we can't view it no more.
The boys in Singspiee tell me you drive a Mini with your head tucked under the steering wheel cuz you feel inferior and 2nd class, no need to, Mini!s are a cool car, I like them.
Right, the OP was asking...........

[impalass]

Originally Posted by coopster9

check this out...

http://www.yankodesign.com/2012/05/2...sor-black-bay/

"Apparently Black Bay will also come with one of their now trademark cotton ribbon style straps!"

= nato?

Thanks for the link, aside from the Black Bay being a winner sight unseen (imo), three factory strap options is a home run.

Can't wait to buy the whole package. Probably going to have to pay list price, by the time they discount (if at all) the prices will have rose anyway.

[FremStar]

Wow! Though I am extremely busy at work I have to chime in! Tudor is an amazing brand, Padi hit all points with it's rich history! I for one prefer the design of my 70330 to my 216570... Pics don't do any of my Tudors any justice, however, here are three pics of my Shields and Big Roses!

[Mystro]

There are two camps on this subject that I have noticed over the years. Price is definitely a factor. Many like the look of Rolex but don't want to pony up the $$$ for he name but like the very similar style of Rolex. Second, is the guy that doesn't care about a status symbol on his wrist and just wants a nice watch with out all the negative baggage with owning a Rolex. Tudor will never impress th status crowd so there is no reason explaining the Rolex connection.