ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 May 2020, 01:14 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: HK
Posts: 51
|
The trend is not big size watch anymore.
|
16 May 2020, 01:16 AM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: Adam Brian
Location: Bowling Green, OH
Posts: 108
|
Quote:
That comment just made me read through my post history and man, I forgot about a lot of that stuff haha. I actually just picked up a pre-owned Breitling Colt, but sadly I don't have anywhere to wear it to right now! Getting back on the discussion though, I agree with you about the mainstream youtubers. However, there are a few channels I like, for example HackSmith (I think it's called that) is a channel where they make fictional props in real life that work, and there are a few other investing channels that I like. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
|
16 May 2020, 01:22 AM | #33 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 74,353
|
Clearly, I don’t know what I am
|
16 May 2020, 01:24 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Around here
Watch: Grandpa's Seiko
Posts: 44
|
Hi,
I am a millenial myself, and from what I see, almost all millenials who have a true passion/admiration for horology, do not fall into that oversized watch trend. Some crossfitters and weightlifters might like humongous G-Shocks (no disrespect at all for either, there's a watch for each person), but that does not explain the whole story. If in an age of technology like the one millenials have been brought up in, an individual happens to like and admire watches or watchmaking, generally I'd say there has been some refined and educated taste involved, many hours of research, and hopefully some understanding of the history of each watch. Otherwise, just have a look at your phone, it's much faster and simple. A sub has and should (IMO) stay 40mm sized, and Rolex has always evolved under the policy of slow, not quite radical and subtle changes. A 2mm increase in a sub would not feel slow, radical or subtle. But that's just my opinion that I hope carries some truth!! All best, P. |
16 May 2020, 01:40 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 270
|
Agreed. I’m a millennial and own a BB58 (39mm). Next watch I’ve been eyeing is an Omega Speedmaster 38mm or a Zenith El Primero 38mm
|
16 May 2020, 01:55 AM | #36 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 876
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk |
|
16 May 2020, 01:59 AM | #37 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,005
|
|
16 May 2020, 02:01 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: Matthew
Location: Tulsa, OK, USA
Posts: 1,921
|
I sure hope so. Rolex should definitely take it up to 42. Oh and they should discontinue the version without date while they're at it. ;)
__________________
|Rolex Submariner 114060|Rolex Datejust 126234 silver dial| |Tudor Heritage Chrono 70330B| |Grand Seiko SBGT021 day-date quartz| |
16 May 2020, 02:09 AM | #39 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 116710 BLNR
Posts: 34,355
|
I think the Sub is just so 20th Century.
Surely, Rolex could produce a 46mm, digital, dive-computer Submariner for the 21st Century.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
16 May 2020, 02:38 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Jay
Location: England
Watch: SkyD
Posts: 6,296
|
|
16 May 2020, 02:46 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Earth
Watch: 126619LB and more
Posts: 5,207
|
|
16 May 2020, 02:55 AM | #42 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,484
|
Quote:
|
|
16 May 2020, 03:06 AM | #43 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 422
|
Quote:
I have to read your posts in a rap voice to make sense of them. I must be old! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
16 May 2020, 03:25 AM | #44 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Nick
Location: YUL
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,936
|
Quote:
__________________
Nick _________________________________________ 14060M - 114200 - 114270 - 214270 - 16710BLRO - 16570 - 3570.50 - Cartier Tank Solo - Cartier Tank Française ‘Yearling’ - CWC Navy Diver |
|
16 May 2020, 03:49 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 100
|
I think the supercase was Rolex's way of saying they understand the desire for a bigger Sub but that it is and will always be a 40mm case.
|
16 May 2020, 03:52 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 2,698
|
it won't happen in the foreseeable future
|
16 May 2020, 04:00 AM | #47 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 74,353
|
|
16 May 2020, 04:04 AM | #48 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,867
|
42 mm rolex submariner?
I think the OP would be happier with a big ol ugly Invicta diver. I think they make them up to about 60mm. The home shopping network has an hour devoted to them and they will ship directly to your door. But you have to act quick because the deal only lasts for the first 100 callers!
__________________
TRF Member 11738 |
16 May 2020, 04:06 AM | #49 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Parth
Location: Los Angeles & SD
Watch: 16613LB
Posts: 577
|
Quote:
|
|
16 May 2020, 04:15 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: CA
Watch: 116519LN
Posts: 614
|
I think we're more likely to see a 37mm Sub than a 42mm.
|
16 May 2020, 04:29 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Yuri
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex Submariner C
Posts: 1,224
|
who knows... only rolex. I wish we had an insider here
|
16 May 2020, 04:37 AM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Vancouver Canada
Watch: Polar
Posts: 105
|
Oh man this is interesting. You got some people who long for the return of the era of smaller watches and others who want bigger. I just got an Explorer II Polar 216570 and feel this is as large as my wrists could handle haha.
Sent from my SM-G970W using Tapatalk |
16 May 2020, 04:56 AM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Marc
Location: NJ
Watch: AP,LV,SD43,PAMs
Posts: 717
|
My opinion is that Rolex should make BOTH a 40mm and a 42mm Sub. They make multiple sized Yachtmasters, why not subs? The SD43 and the Deep Sea are true divers watches with helium escape valves and heft. I like my Sd43, but wish it sat flatter to the wrist and weighed less than 186grams. I presume the caseback protrusion and thickness emanates from helium escape and depth rating. Most of us never use these as diving watches, so lighter and flatter would be better. Maybe call the 42mm Sub the Seamariner?
|
16 May 2020, 05:14 AM | #54 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
|
|
16 May 2020, 05:15 AM | #55 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
|
|
16 May 2020, 05:19 AM | #56 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
|
Quote:
Wow! 15 years old and you already know about good watches. Respect man. When I was 15, I cared more about bicycles and trampolines hahaha But I don’t regret that either. I’m just impressed |
|
16 May 2020, 05:21 AM | #57 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
|
Quote:
You HAVE to be trolling This one made me laugh out loud Pewdiepie? Come on. My girls 8 year old little sister talks about that. Why would Rolex change the gmt master or a sub because some pewdiepie thinks it’s boring |
|
16 May 2020, 05:23 AM | #58 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
|
|
16 May 2020, 05:32 AM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: In a city
Posts: 376
|
If they didn’t do in the humongous watch phase, I can’t see them doing now that tastes are going smaller. A a 7” wrist guy - 40mm is pretty good.
NOW - could I see a 42mm, lower profile Sea Dweller? that might be pretty awesome. |
16 May 2020, 05:36 AM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Traffic
Watch: DW-5600BB
Posts: 2,804
|
I don’t think Rolex will make a 42mm Submariner. 40mm is a classic, traditional size. I say it will stay that size. Personally , the “Big Watch” looks silly, and I think was a trend. Most people I see wearing one, the watch doesn’t fit them. I feel like they want others to notice their watch. That’s not a reason for me to wear one. Recently, I see more traditional size watches.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.