5167 - Things to know before buying?

[Bearxj86]

Originally Posted by mineral

for the same reasons you have stated. In addition I find the Pointer date type very difficult to read compare to date window on the simpler dial of 5167.

Oh yes- the lume and legibility is AMAZING.

[matbaj]

I got the bracelet version aquanaut it blows away any rubber strap here is a shot compared to my no date sub

[rw2008]

Originally Posted by dmash

Definitely try it on first if possible! I know people who thought they’d love the piece, but then decided it felt entirely too ‘dainty’ to be their sole sport piece. If you enjoy heft, you may hate it.

Agreed. It’s great for what it is, but make sure you’ve tried it on and it’s for you.

[subtona]

Older versions will not allow a swap from rubber to bracelet.

My personal advice has been to go for a nautilus instead (I've had both), though I still feel that way, recent price increases have made this a very different conversation.

[Ichiran]

I have my aquanaut in bracelet, because I prefer my watches in bracelet. I love it because I find it very versatile and it can be worn for many types of occasions.

Coming from Rolex, I would say Rolex watches feel more robust while the aquanaut feels more delicate. The SS bezel on the aquanaut is more prone to scratches as compared to a Rolex with ceramic bezel. Setting time on the Rolex is quicker as there is more travel for each wound of the Rolex crown. There is no hacking on the 324 Patek caliber.

[dannyp]

Originally Posted by GB-man

Yeah it’s going to feel extremely light and thin coming from a Rolex. This throws some people off and draws others in. Just be aware of it.

Also the rotor makes a whirring noise, the movement does not hack and the bezel is susceptible to wear easily.


That said, it’s a favorite of mine and many others. Extremely comfortable and a really good fit on my 7” wrist.

While it may be lighter ounce for ounce (especially on the tropical strap), it feels at least as solid.

Also, if you haven't had a non-hacking watch, it means you shouldn't attempt to set the time backwards...

Originally Posted by enjoythemusic

Agree, it is going to feel quite a bit lighter. The Patek will be more fragile, so be very careful of the Patek bezel as it tends to be a scratch magnet. As long as you remember it is a sporty dress watch and not a true sports watch you should be fine. Have a feeling that was my personal mistake in thinking it was a true sports timepiece with normal durability.

Agree 100%. I've never been one to beat up on any of my watches, but have still had issues with normal wear and tear leading to sudden stopping of the watch and need for overhaul.

Originally Posted by subtona

Older versions will not allow a swap from rubber to bracelet.

How old? Back with the 5065, bracelet versions automatically came with the strap as an extra. Didn't realize that wasn't the case with the 67.

[Calatrava r]

Originally Posted by tyler1980

the only advice i have is to try the 5164 before making the decision.

I agree. The date window on the 5167 really does not look good on the dial. The 5164 has no date window and the dial flows much better.

[JR16]

Originally Posted by Calatrava r

I agree. The date window on the 5167 really does not look good on the dial. The 5164 has no date window and the dial flows much better.

I think this is very subjective . I much prefer the date window of the 5167 than the wheel/pointer of the 5164 as I find a traditional date window much easier to read . But I do agree, aesthetically the 5164 dial flows better- so for me it’s a trade-off and I usually lean toward pragmatics when faced w that decision.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[tyler1980]

Originally Posted by JR16

I think this is very subjective . I much prefer the date window of the 5167 than the wheel/pointer of the 5164 as I find a traditional date window much easier to read . But I do agree, aesthetically the 5164 dial flows better- so for me it’s a trade-off and I usually lean toward pragmatics when faced w that decision.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

i agree its subjective... i just think everyone should take the time to try both. Not just buy the first one they see.

date windows aside the 64 has more wrist presence so it also wears differently. I could probably deal with the date window even if they are not my favorite if the 5167 wasn't so thin. For some people thats a positive, but for a sports watch on rubber i prefer a thicker watch.