ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 May 2014, 03:56 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
|
Of course!
DSSD is THE rock star, no other choice in similar dive watch lineup. My 2c.
|
26 May 2014, 03:59 PM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,180
|
Quote:
|
|
26 May 2014, 08:58 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,348
|
|
26 May 2014, 09:02 PM | #34 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,580
|
i thought this was the "rock star rolex"??
|
26 May 2014, 09:03 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: England
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 643
|
no, it is a fat Submariner.
|
26 May 2014, 09:07 PM | #36 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,348
|
Quote:
I think the 4000 has been introduced as the standard sub is starting to feel very thin and lightweight so this way rolex can please both traditionalist and people that want a more modern heft to there watches. As far as not selling many dssd how have you concluded this as rolex do not release sales figures so you are guessing....i guess |
|
26 May 2014, 09:16 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Geert
Location: Belgium
Watch: rolex/JLC/panerai
Posts: 5,612
|
I always feel like a Rockstar or moviestar with my DSSD on my wrist
Oh and for the "haters" on here...I just know you'll want a DSSD and will appreciate it, once it's discontinued ! It will be a grailwatch then. YES I am keeping mine |
26 May 2014, 09:27 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: EU
Posts: 320
|
Yes!
|
26 May 2014, 09:33 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Katy, TX
Watch: GMT II-c TT
Posts: 772
|
Yes, it is the rock star. The engineering is second to none, the bracelet is the best in the Sub line. And it is just an overall cool watch.
|
26 May 2014, 09:47 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
Its the Jersey Shore Rolex
|
26 May 2014, 10:17 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Middle
Posts: 878
|
|
26 May 2014, 10:29 PM | #42 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Location: UNITED STATES
Posts: 301
|
While an interesting technical exercise, the Deep Sea needs to be smaller and without all the text all over it. It doesn't need to shout with all its practical prowess and owners who use it don't want to shout with the watch either. As noted above, there is a reason the new Sea-dweller came out...because the Deep Sea was NOT doing the job of effectively replacing the old one.
The real Rock Star in the SS line was discontinued. It was the one that knew it's was cool enough to not have to visually brag about itself....The 36mm Explorer I. |
26 May 2014, 11:01 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Azam
Location: Texas
Posts: 607
|
Correct.
I had a DSSD and felt it was too big, but missed it after wearing the SD. So got another DSSD which I was wearing and a buddy who is looking to get a SD tried it on yesterday. It looked comically large on his wrist. The watch and owners proportions have to match. I am 6'1" with a 7.5" wrist and he is 5'9" with a 6.5" wrist. The SD would suit him better proportionately than a DSSD. It's not that complicated. :-) Regards. |
26 May 2014, 11:23 PM | #44 |
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Detroit
Watch: 16710 GMTII A SEL
Posts: 49
|
I love these posts about opinion as it seems in this robust community everyone has one and they are fierce. Bottom line- if you were to pose this question with "is the SubC..." or "is the Daytona..." you would have the same positive/negative response. Ultimately I would make any decision on a purchase this important on what you like- not what other people think. Either way you are going to get an absolutely wonderful watch from one of Earth top brands. IMHO! Btw- I do love the DSSD but could do without the text...
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
26 May 2014, 11:37 PM | #45 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
Quote:
|
|
26 May 2014, 11:49 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Abram
Location: NorCal
Watch: Rolex & Patek
Posts: 513
|
|
27 May 2014, 01:11 AM | #47 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 1,601
|
Quote:
i dont agree with the speculation - the DSSD was never intended to effectively replace any older model. it was (and continues to be) its own watch with its own place in the lineup - this is fact, as they have now brought back the SD and yet the DSSD still continues.... |
|
27 May 2014, 01:19 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rich
Location: Lancaster, PA
Watch: Exp II 42mm Polar
Posts: 227
|
Most guys that dislike the DSSD can't pull it off because they have small wrists. Some don't like it because of the text on the ring lock or the bracelet taper. For me, any watch smaller than 42mm is just too small. I have a 7 3/4" flat wrist so I need the deepsea as a Sub or regular SD look like a woman's watch on me. Larger watches are not a fad they are the norm now. Rolex is in the minority of luxury watch brands by having most of its line 41mm and smaller. That's not a bad or good thing. IMHO making the SD4000 a 40mm watch was a huge mistake, should have made it 42mm and it would have appealed to a much larger audience. To those that like their tiny subC's and SD's enjoy! I'll stick with a man's watch thank you
|
27 May 2014, 01:27 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: San Diego
Watch: Sub-C blue, DSSD
Posts: 2,482
|
The DSSD is the Rock Star (SS) for me with it's bigger size, more weight, glidelock extension system, and the domed crystal is the greatest!
|
27 May 2014, 01:38 AM | #50 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: San Diego
Watch: Sub-C blue, DSSD
Posts: 2,482
|
Quote:
+1. Well stated. |
|
27 May 2014, 03:39 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: planet rolex
Posts: 1,728
|
|
27 May 2014, 03:52 AM | #52 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: PacNW
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 2,606
|
Quote:
|
|
27 May 2014, 03:57 AM | #53 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: England
Posts: 514
|
Quote:
|
|
27 May 2014, 04:30 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: BondJamesBond
Location: The Algarve
Watch: Rolex or nothing
Posts: 3,928
|
Enjoy your new watch!
__________________
♛ 5-digit Rolex or nothing ♛ 16030, 16613, 16713, 18038. |
27 May 2014, 04:46 AM | #55 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
|
Quote:
|
|
27 May 2014, 05:01 AM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: Texas
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 364
|
DSSD will be my next purchase. I like its size, partly because I'm a bigger guy with large wrists. It is to me, but it's different for everyone as I'm sure you can see by now.
|
27 May 2014, 05:05 AM | #57 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,278
|
Quote:
|
|
27 May 2014, 05:22 AM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Thomas
Location: Tampa, FL
Watch: DSSD,Sub,YMII,SD43
Posts: 152
|
Instead of hating on one of the best watches ever built. I can see where it is top heavy on a smaller wrist. Perhaps you should buy a watch that fits you. I don't know of anyone that buys an Armani suits 3 sizes to big. I am somewhat of a bigger build and the DSSD is the perfect size for me. I have to admit though, that it took some time getting used to the extra weight on my wrist.
|
27 May 2014, 08:22 AM | #59 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
Quote:
|
|
27 May 2014, 08:33 AM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Watch: 116610 , 16233
Posts: 1,802
|
Wear what you love
I'm a subc date kinda guy
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.