5 digit wearers... do you feel the need to upgrade?

[77T]

Originally Posted by old expat beast

i prefer the fives across the board, and in some cases even the fours (eg the 5513 sub). I also prefer the lighter, slimmer clasps and bracelets.

+1

[droptopman]

6 digits < 5 digits < 4 digits....I keep going the other way towards all 4 digits references. I love the thin cases, flatter case backs and lighter/thinner bracelets.

Do not take me wrong, I really like the looks of many of the 6 digit references, love them in pictures, I just do not like the way they wear and feel on me.

Honestly it would be much easier if I did. Vintage pieces are much harder and generally more expensive to source.

[Cimballi]

When I see the 6-digits worn around me, I feel perfectly fine with my two 5-digits watches.
For me, switching would not be an upgrade.

[douglasf13]

Nope. If anything, I'd go older. As I just mentioned in another thread, the new ceramic Daytona is the only Rolex I can think of that I like better than its predecessor (and I'd still rather have a vintage Daytona.)

[slorollin]

I like the 5 digits in every category. Don't know how they even sell those 6ers.

[SA1]

The 5 digit Sub is a more versatile watch. You can dress it up or stay casual.

[Daytona88]

I used to feel that way but this forum has educated me and provided me with a strong appreciation for the attributes associated with the 5 digit references. They have a lot to offer and are simply different than their 6 digit siblings.

[Justinmg]

I have a six digit SD and I find myself wishing i had got the 5 digit version. My only expirence with a 5 digit was with a 36m exp and I know this is going to sound crazy buy I liked the old clasp better then I like my glidlock. Something about the old clasp just feels more Rolex to me. There is no new Rolex I'd buy.

[Ckci]

Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast

I prefer the fives across the board, and in some cases even the fours (eg the 5513 Sub). I also prefer the lighter, slimmer clasps and bracelets.

Totally agree! In general for me 4's>5's>6's! Please post pics of your 5 digit models, otherwise its teasing. Russell.

[DCheeta]

Originally Posted by Ckci

Totally agree! In general for me 4's>5's>6's! Please post pics of your 5 digit models, otherwise its teasing. Russell.

You're right, Russell. This thread desperately needs photos...but where are yours?

I think five-digit Rolexes are awesome. I love the lighter bracelets and slimmer lugs. I also love six-digit models, their solid bracelets and ceramic bezels are great. I wear them both, depending on what I feel like wearing on a given day.

My five-digit Sub. Still awesome.

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by nick c

The right direction

[Old Expat Beast]

Originally Posted by Ckci

Totally agree! In general for me 4's>5's>6's! Please post pics of your 5 digit models, otherwise its teasing. Russell.

Here's my 1964 A-K 5501 (34mm) up against the 2016 six-digit model (40mm). All that remains is the Air-King font.

[tjbender]

No doubt six digit models are nicer/more refined watches. That said, for me, five digit models are where it's at. The few exception being the Daytona, Datejust/Day Date.

[Boaters]

Went from 6 to 5 to 6 and my next one will be a 5 funny how that works

[VinnieVegas]

Originally Posted by brandrea

Funny, but I've started to go the other direction

Kudos! Four digits rule, bro.

[Ravager135]

I prefer the newer upgrades but my first Rolex was a 16610. The 5 digit references have a charm that is just different from the modern references.

[HogwldFLTR]

Fives for me; one six fills my needs. I really like the fives in general much better.

[Wisher]

So far have all 5s. (6 of them to be exact: 3 Daytona, 2GMT, 1 lv sub). I think they look and feel like what a Rolex is supposed to be. I am am kind nostalgic when it comes to Rolex watches. Even the new Daytona C doesn't appeal to me at all. BUT, I do admit that the newest DJ and DD appeal to me because of the larger size only. I sold a 5-digit DJ because it wasn't a good match for my size wrist. If and when a 6 comes along I like, I could get, but will keep all the 5s anyway.

[Aceldama]

I'd also be going in the opposite direction. Love me those log holes!

[AzHadEnuf]

image.jpg

I appreciate the 6 digit models, but prefer the 4 & 5 digits.

[Steve36Efc]

I had a five digit GMT2, that I never wore because I always chose the 6 digits over it. So I let it go.

[HogwldFLTR]

Originally Posted by Aceldama

I'd also be going in the opposite direction. Love me those log holes!

Is that where you stash your watches?

Actually come to think of it I have two six digit references, DJII and OP.

[capote]

No interest in 6 digits. I'm not swayed by the newer braclets either, I guess I have no problem with swelling wrists.

[douglasf13]

Originally Posted by capote

No interest in 6 digits. I'm not swayed by the newer braclets either, I guess I have no problem with swelling wrists.

Agreed. Plus, the newer bracelets and clasps feel heavier and more bulky. I often wear 5 digit Sub on a strap, anyways.

[mic6]

Originally Posted by Charlie_pace

I have a 16610, and I go back and forth... Constantly...

I am a bigger guy, and I have bigger wrists. My 16610 looks perfectly fine on me, but I recently tried on a 16613 and literally fell in love. It's just so blocky and masculine. It feels more modern, more substantial, more everything. I fully see myself "upgrading" at some point. That's how I feel today, ask me in a week, and my answer may be different.

I guess you don't mean 16613? Maybe 116613?

[ronin_ph]

Having both is best of both worlds obviously. However, to me, 5-digit feels better on wrist.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Singslinger]

I'm in the minority here but I think six is better than five.

Flipped my "Fat Lady'' GMT 2 for the new ceramic version which I think is so much more durable, comfortable and good-looking. Not to mention cheaper to service.

It was the only "5-ref'' that I owned and will likely own; the other five are all new "6-refs''.

[MoonExplorer]

I'd rather save and just add versus flipping to do an upgrade.

[adg31]

Originally Posted by leftnose

I have a 5 digit Sub and a 6 digit Datejust. I wouldn't swap either one for the other generation. 6 digit sport watches are too chunky whereas 5 digit dress watches are too slim to me.

I was going to say the exact same thing; thanks for saving typing time 😃

[Black Bay Dan]

I definite no from me. I would not buy a new Submariner or GMT II until the Maxi Case is a thing of the past.

Dan