|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 October 2021, 11:22 AM
|
#31 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: NC
Posts: 39
|
Tough to say. I really love the bracelet/clasp/bezel and sportiness of the 116610.
The 16610 has the classic sub look and the slimmer lugs look better to me on Nato's (which I wear often). |
|
|
|
22 October 2021, 12:36 PM
|
#32 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,453
|
126610 has my vote.
__________________
126710BLRO-0001 / 116610LV / 116613LB / Silver Snoopy / PAM24 / PAM111 |
|
|
|
|
22 October 2021, 03:06 PM
|
#33 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Will Zdorf
Location: So. Cal.
Watch: SDC4000, Sub LVC
Posts: 1,941
|
Yeah…of these 2 choices I’d go with the 126610 all day long!
  
|
|
|
|
|
23 October 2021, 01:03 AM
|
#34 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Argentina
Posts: 776
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 October 2021, 01:46 AM
|
#35 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 1665
Posts: 4,749
|
I own and equally enjoy both: the 16800 for a more classic design and lighter feel, the 116610 for a more modern style with the latest upgrades.
__________________
He could not just wear a watch. It had to be a Rolex. Ian Fleming |
|
|
|
|
23 October 2021, 02:00 AM
|
#36 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,069
|
I like the 116610 more than the 16610 - nicer clasp, maxi dial, and beautiful ceramic bezel.
__________________
t65tampa |
|
|
|
|
23 October 2021, 02:12 AM
|
#37 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: up a hill
Posts: 1,677
|
16610, but 5513 FTW.
|
|
|
|
|
23 October 2021, 03:50 AM
|
#38 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: washington dc
Posts: 5
|
5 digits better
|
|
|
|
|
23 October 2021, 04:02 AM
|
#39 |
|
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 61,875
|
I have both, I dig both.
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons 
|
|
|
|
|
23 October 2021, 04:06 AM
|
#40 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 947
|
I prefer 116610LN. 5 digits feel kinda cheap to me.
|
|
|
|
|
23 October 2021, 04:35 AM
|
#41 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 36
|
I miss my 5 digits.
|
|
|
|
|
23 October 2021, 04:49 AM
|
#42 |
|
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,461
|
I like the big case of the 6 digit for it’s sturdy look and the shiny ceramic bezel.
The glidelock I could have done without, way too big.
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
|
|
|
|
23 October 2021, 11:07 AM
|
#43 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Singapore
Posts: 55
|
 my full stickers 16610 and unworn 16700 from year 1991. I love the classic feel and look of 5 digits and the way they patina, it is just lovely not sure why the photo is not appearing http://imgur.com/gallery/K3Q2QMx |
|
|
|
|
24 October 2021, 03:33 AM
|
#44 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: David
Location: Seattle
Watch: Daytona-C
Posts: 325
|
I have a 6.5 in wrist and feel like the 6 digit is a bit too big for me. Otherwise the 6 digit is perfect.
__________________
116500 (black) 116519 (steel) 2FA Enabled |
|
|
|
|
26 October 2021, 10:33 AM
|
#45 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 24,751
|
 Enough said!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 2230.50.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 Zenith 02.480.405 Henry Archer Eclipse 2FA security enabled |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
