ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 January 2022, 02:39 PM | #31 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,483
|
I have a 5513 and a BB (original version from 2012) and the BB gets a lot more wrist time. I'd probably sell the 5513 first if I needed the cash.
__________________
_______________________ |
6 January 2022, 02:41 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 141
|
ok . . . ..
|
6 January 2022, 07:00 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: EU
Watch: ♕
Posts: 11,920
|
Huge congratz with the perfect BB58 watch
__________________
♕16570 ♕126610 ♕126333 |
6 January 2022, 07:45 PM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Oslo
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
It was introduced in 1969 and I'm quite frankly pissed that Tudor didn't have the balls to call it the Black Bay Sixty-Nine. #BornToDare my ass... |
|
6 January 2022, 08:50 PM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 32,528
|
Congratulations! Sorry to hear that you let the 5513 go but you're happy and the 58 is a solid choice.
|
6 January 2022, 09:31 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: NYC
Posts: 952
|
One way to say FU to Rolex and the insane world it created loud and clear.
|
6 January 2022, 09:49 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 830
|
Not trolling , didn’t have to let the 5513 go, didn’t need the cash.
The 5513 I sold was a beautiful plastic and flawless matte dial visual delight. Objectively the 58 is a considerably better watch in nearly all aspects. My original attraction to the 5513 was the “cool by association” factor. For me it conjured up images of Steve McQueen, Paul Newman, Connery Bond, issued milsubs and commercial divers. Effortlessly cool. I had planned on leaving it to my son but honestly all of the history of that watch was presumably with the previous owner[s]. I hadn’t taken it to Vietnam or climbed a mountain while wearing it nor had I swam in the sea or scuffed it on rocks and mud. What I would end up leaving behind is someone else’s now fragile watch no real family connection other than I occasionally wore it but not while doing anything that might damage it. It wasnt the same “cool by association” watch because it couldn’t be used in the same way. It was now old and practically functionally inferior to modern watches. I can’t imagine bond or McQueen removing their watch putting it on the table before getting into a movie bar fight. You get the idea. Now it didn’t conjure up images of issued tool watches . Rolex has ‘for me’ become an increasingly less attractive brand. I now think of instagram pictures with strategically placed Ferrari steering wheels . Sunny pool /beach photos. All with #Rolex tags. The forum posts. About which is the best investment watch, “help me decide on my own watch to buy” how best to cuck up to the Dealer etc. The madness of paying above retail price for the grey dealers abundant stock of watches while the AD have very little. Personally it’s all a bit Try too hard. Interestingly enough I went to buy a seiko and while looking through the dealer window at the Tudor display the dealer sales person came out engaged me in conversation and sold me a 58. I feel good about that, I didn’t suck up or take chocolates or pop in every month to show worthiness. No offence meant to anyone just explaining my thoughts . I still own a Rolex - good solid under the radar watch. Oh and I’ll probably still buy that seiko. |
6 January 2022, 09:53 PM | #38 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 1,864
|
This story makes me want to cry, sorry for your loss.
|
6 January 2022, 09:53 PM | #39 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 74,687
|
|
6 January 2022, 10:10 PM | #40 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 22,772
|
Congrats on the 58 !
|
6 January 2022, 10:19 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 830
|
|
6 January 2022, 11:18 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Justin
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex & Omega
Posts: 211
|
Love your attitude and totally agree with you about patina and vintage watches with someone else’s history.
|
7 January 2022, 12:12 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Philadelphia
Watch: 116900
Posts: 298
|
Trolling? So what if he is. This is suppose to be fun. I intially came on to find out about changing hands on an older AK. I received all of the information I needed in 10 minutes. I decided to stay on for fun. Sometimes it is fun, however, it itseems like an extremely conservative crew that is very quick to judge. Come on. This is about watches.
|
7 January 2022, 12:15 AM | #44 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 830
|
Quote:
|
|
7 January 2022, 12:18 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Philadelphia
Watch: 116900
Posts: 298
|
Hey Innocenti, I didnt read your latest before I posted. I feel very similar the way you do. Unless post is about a Daytona or GMT (BMW steering wheel) haaa. doesn't seem to get any respect. Weird. I like the 58. Curious how their in house movements will hold up.
|
7 January 2022, 12:38 AM | #46 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 830
|
Quote:
I’m sure it will be fine , certainly good enough. It’s lost about 4 seconds since I got it. But if we wanted to know what the time really was we’d look at our phones right? My son in law wants a Rolex , probably to go with his Nike trainers and tracksuit, no sure which one I don’t think he knows either. Just big and shiny with loadsa instagram wrist presence . |
|
7 January 2022, 12:45 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Philadelphia
Watch: 116900
Posts: 298
|
I have two Air Kings. Both wear on a Nato. The 14000 with the switched Mercedes Hands I dont wear too often. Newly serviced and runs like a work horse. The 116900 I wear all of the time. Does not get any looks really. That is why I like it. No nonsense, just the time easy to read. Will last me until I die. Then one of my nephews will get it.
|
7 January 2022, 12:57 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 830
|
Nice watches
I was tempted by the new 36mm explorer. But honestly the thought of walking into an AD and feeling like they might be doing me some kinda favour kept me away. In my mind I know an explorer (or any Rolex) isnt really worth the RRP , that’s why they spend tens of millions on marketing and sponsorship to convince us that it is. I can just about if I squint justify the retail cost with some reverse Jedi mind trick. But all the other hoop jumping and cavity searches are too much for me. So far the 58 is really growing on me . |
7 January 2022, 01:07 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Philadelphia
Watch: 116900
Posts: 298
|
We have very similar thoughts. These aren't the droids you're looking for.
|
7 January 2022, 01:54 AM | #50 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Steve
Location: Chicago
Watch: Rolex and Omega
Posts: 553
|
Quote:
I love this thinking. It’s what’s cool to you, not the masses, that matters.
__________________
Regards, Steve |
|
7 January 2022, 02:52 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Midlands, UK
Posts: 4,764
|
Congrats on the 58 - cracking watch.
|
7 January 2022, 03:31 AM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Ian
Location: Hamburg
Watch: Sub 14060
Posts: 1,134
|
I don't think I'd ever have sold a 5513, and the BB 58 just doesn't do it for me, but that´s just my humble opinion, don't bother what others think. Do enjoy your new Tudor! (By the way I loved your review, although I found it rather verbose: just "Nice." would have done...!!)
|
7 January 2022, 03:49 AM | #53 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 830
|
Quote:
Now it feels the same kind of quality as something you would buy from from a car park market for $30. The level of watch doesn’t feel like a $15k $20k or $30k+ |
|
7 January 2022, 04:00 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 2,808
|
I think people are either into vintage or they aren't. Generally speaking I'm also the latter. I like looking at vintage pieces, and can appreciate them for what they are and what they represented at the time, but after handling a number over the years I can safely say I have absolutely no desire to own one. Vintage build quality, acrylic crystals, hollow or rolled metal links, patina.... all of that leaves me cold.
I even found the bracelet and clasp on my (departed) 16610LV and 14060M a little too "vintage" for my liking. @Innocenti - the most important thing is that you're happy with the change, and it certainly sounds like you are. |
7 January 2022, 04:25 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 830
|
Good point
I would describe my self as a vintage watch guy. I think a couple of factors are at play though. A disassociation with the brand and what it has become. The watch as I said before started to feel a bit silly. Who uses a dive watch for diving anymore? A dive watch you wouldn’t wear in the shower . A tool watch you take off for most physical tasks or adventure. It’s monetary worth had increased while it’s value to me diminished. If it had been my dads watch or a friends watch, there in would lie the true value. However a nice gilt dial 1016 I could maybe justify that ���� |
7 January 2022, 05:17 AM | #56 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Midwest US
Posts: 75
|
Quote:
|
|
7 January 2022, 11:30 AM | #57 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 24,800
|
Quote:
Nice review! Congrats and welcome to the BB58 club! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 2230.50.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 Zenith 02.480.405 Henry Archer Eclipse 2FA security enabled |
|
7 January 2022, 12:04 PM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PHILA
Posts: 1,720
|
Love my 58’s but no way I could get rid of a 5513 for them.
|
7 January 2022, 04:59 PM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 830
|
|
7 January 2022, 05:31 PM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 218
|
Compelling story Innocenti. I totally get it. Kudos to you for your logical approach and sharing your narrative.
My BB58 Blue gets plenty of wrist time and is highly wearable! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.