ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 March 2022, 12:14 AM | #31 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Brad
Location: Purdue
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 9,117
|
Don’t click here if you don’t like post about accuracy
Quote:
Agreed. It's a cheap and easy health check if you don't want to commit the time to knowing the real rate. I used to have a timegrapher and sold it. I spend my days at work designing and measuring clocks and frequency references for aerospace applications so it felt a little too much like work to be a hobby. This is a real man's timegrapher measuring ~6 femtoseconds of RMS jitter. I paid $280,000 for this box.
__________________
♛ ✠ Ω 2FA Active |
|
3 March 2022, 02:10 AM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 488
|
Quote:
Wow that’s some serious machine! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
3 March 2022, 06:31 AM | #33 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,743
|
Don’t click here if you don’t like post about accuracy
Quote:
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=786299 My timegrapher rates, amplitudes, and precision measurements along the entire power reserve (for 6 different watches) you can find here: https://www.rolexforums.com/showpost...postcount=1232 A simple sketch to illustrate the difference between accuracy and precision: |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.