Considering Trading - Sub (116610LN) for Explorer II (216570)

[ferrissteve11]

Had the EXII for a few months - never really cared for it once on the wrist. Looked great in pics though.
The proportions of the hands seemed 'off' (to me anyway) and I never could get over the tiny twinlock crown. I realize it was designed with a certain application in mind, however, I just never really bonded with it. Only watch I never did with actually.
Keep the Sub IMO...

[robinmgb]

I’ve owned and sold both
The Sub is boring imo but the explorer is even worse with the horrible steel bezel and has nothing going for it, I only bought as a bargain price but don’t recommend buying a watch based on a good deal, buy what you like

[Sooner78]

Originally Posted by Jonny8

I’ve had both (all be it a 114060) and a 124060 and would place them in this order for comfort:

124060 (just)
226570
114060

I would as others have suggested, try to add first and then move one on.

The Steve McQueen comparison for casual doesn’t really work for me as he is wearing a smaller non ceramic sub, not one of the larger shiney ones!

Good stuff. Thanks, bud.

[Sooner78]

Originally Posted by ferrissteve11

Had the EXII for a few months - never really cared for it once on the wrist. Looked great in pics though.
The proportions of the hands seemed 'off' (to me anyway) and I never could get over the tiny twinlock crown. I realize it was designed with a certain application in mind, however, I just never really bonded with it. Only watch I never did with actually.
Keep the Sub IMO...

Noted. Thank you.

[shalako]

Go for what you like, the Exp 2 is a great choice, the world and his wife own a Sub so of course everyone will be saying how wonderful it is but to me they are boring, at least with the Exp 2 you will have something far more unique.

[MrMercedes]

Originally Posted by aboutadog

The beauty of the Sub is you can dress it up or down. The elapsed time bezel is great for timing burgers or naps or dives ;) I've owned both and although the Exp II is a great comfortable watch, it's not as versatile, classic, or as cool as the Sub.

[MrMercedes]

But still an excellent watch!!

[mailman]

I traded a Sub for a 216570 and went back to the Sub.

[AmgAslLolBrb]

Originally Posted by sah

I do not think switching watches just because you want a casual look is a good idea.

Excellent point. The sub is very versatile looks good with a suit, or t shirt and jeans.

[gek1245]

i bought a BLNR on jubilee 6 years after I acquired my sub (same as yours). The BLNR actually made me appreciate my sub even more.

[Gearjockey]

I don’t really care what everyone else has. The Sub is the iconic Rolex watch for a reason and it is not an upgrade to trade for the Explorer II, but that’s just me.
Everyone who says that black is boring, blah blah blah… I have a black car and a white car. Neither are boring, both are the most popular colors. They just work.
I did have a red Corvette once tho 🤔

[Garry1]

I'd keep the Sub and add the Explorer II when I can, and I'd love to add the white dial to complement my my Sub, they will make a good pair.

[youneswatches]

Both watches are great, i just don't think it is necessary to switch watch just because you want a casual watch

[AF_Rob]

Originally Posted by gferreira

Have you tried the white (polar) explorer ii? Might be a nice complement to your sub.

It's the perfect complement, IMO. I've had the 5-digit duo for years. I should have just stopped there.

[John Doyle]

Add the Explorer 2... unless you don't have the funds, then I much prefer the Exp 2 and would do the exchange