ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 August 2019, 09:51 AM | #61 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: N California
Posts: 909
|
Quote:
|
|
10 August 2019, 09:57 AM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: N California
Posts: 909
|
I doubt that I would have spent $200 on a watch in the mid 1960 time frame. I was wearing $8 watches in those days.
|
10 August 2019, 09:59 AM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: N California
Posts: 909
|
|
10 August 2019, 10:05 AM | #64 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
|
I believe my first Rolex, a 16220 Datejust around 1990 was 1600-1800 if I recall.
|
10 August 2019, 10:29 AM | #65 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Palm Beach, Flori
Posts: 608
|
Quote:
Funny you should mention an Accutron. I’m very fortunate in that I’m 54 and still have both my parents. I was at dinner with my parents last weekend and my Dad and I were talking when I suddenly remembered a watch he had when I was a small boy. It was (as he told me) a Bulova Accutron. The one where you could see all the ‘guts’ when looking at it. As a boy it mesmerized me because (this was the time when the Bionic Man was the most popular tv show and I was a huge fan, running around the playground in slow motion and making that sound as I moved) it looked like a cyborg. I asked my Dad what happened to it and he told me the it was stolen by a workman one day who was at the house doing some repairs. We then began a trip down memory lane. My Dad is older and has been battling cancer for a few years and I could see a twinkle in his eye as he recalled those younger years. So after dinner I was on a mission. I located someone in Michigan with the same model (doing this from memory), purchased it and had it shipped to my father’s house. He received it this last Wednesday and was blown away. My Mom told me he was crying he was so happy. I cannot tell you how happy I was to be able to do this. Never take anyone for granted and never miss an opportunity to tell your parents you love them. Don’t assume they know; we don’t know how many days we all have left with them. And here’s a picture of the watch on dads wrist. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
10 August 2019, 11:00 AM | #66 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Nick
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: 1601
Posts: 10,503
|
Quote:
Amazing story Peter! Thank you for sharing! AOW |
|
10 August 2019, 11:15 AM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Watch: PP, Rolex, PAM
Posts: 641
|
Going from memory, I paid $2,100 for my Rolex Explore 11 in 1997 and $6,000 for my SS white Face Daytona in 1999.
|
10 August 2019, 01:08 PM | #68 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Location: texas
Watch: 126610 LV
Posts: 1,529
|
Quote:
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk |
|
10 August 2019, 01:17 PM | #69 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: 33139/95460
Posts: 1,321
|
Great story, thanks.
And - Accutron Spaceview! By chance, I’m wearing my asymmetric Spaceview right now ... . |
10 August 2019, 01:23 PM | #70 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: California/Malaga
Watch: GShock Frogman
Posts: 540
|
Quote:
|
|
10 August 2019, 01:26 PM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: California/Malaga
Watch: GShock Frogman
Posts: 540
|
|
10 August 2019, 02:08 PM | #72 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Anastasios
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 8,497
|
Such a big difference with prices now and in the past
In 1969 after my military service I went to work for an authorised Rolex dealer for $150 a week ..with less than 3 weeks pay you could have bought any sport watch 1675, 1680, 5513, 1665, 6239, 1655 were all readily available ...and NOT selling. I bought with my employee discount (then half price) plus another 25% discount from Rolex USA because I would be wearing what I sold !!...try and get this today...lol Anyway I bought with my managers suggestion a most beautiful Daytona 6239 with exotic dial ...which later became Known as a Newman and Panda...for a total of approximately $175..paying 20 per week ...yeap those were the days Today there is a supply problem and you need 20 plus weeks of a current weekly base pay |
10 August 2019, 02:47 PM | #73 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,650
|
Quote:
Beautiful heartfelt story here. God bless. Would love to see a pic of the 6263. |
|
10 August 2019, 02:51 PM | #74 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
|
Rolex has always been expensive for average folks.It still is .
However,at MRSP compared to other offerings in the market place, a ss sports rolex from an AD is a steal .(That's not even considering the hyped value ) |
10 August 2019, 09:46 PM | #75 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Clemson
Watch: G Shock
Posts: 610
|
Yes they were, you can go look at the advertised prices. I know a sub was less then a months pay when I was in the military in 1976, rough guess now a sub is twice that
|
10 August 2019, 11:40 PM | #76 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: East Coast
Watch: 16610
Posts: 4,933
|
Simply put in the MSRP of a Rolex in the 60’s and 70’s and put that figure into a cost of living calculator. What you will find is that Rolex went from being a quality item priced highly but attainably with some saving. Cost of living calculator will show Rolex prices have far outstripped cost of living/inflation and moved into the luxury category sometime in the late 70’s to early 80’s.
|
11 August 2019, 12:25 AM | #77 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
|
Quote:
|
|
11 August 2019, 12:35 AM | #78 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Orange County, CA
Watch: SD43
Posts: 451
|
If I remember correctly, in 1984... a Heuer 2000 Quartz Chrono in Switzerland cost ~$250. The cheapest Rolex, an Air King, was $100 more.
Smart me: I went for the Heuer. LOL. $2300 for a GMT-II 16710 Coke from Singapore in 1997 was pricey but not outrageous. |
11 August 2019, 12:45 AM | #79 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 14,837
|
A SS no date Sub was a $3k watch when I was first in the market. I could also buy SS Daytona below msrp as no one wanted one compared to the TT and 18k models.
|
11 August 2019, 12:51 AM | #80 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Missouri USA
Watch: Daytona C white
Posts: 2,248
|
I believe they were. My father paid $1200 for a Sub in 1979(80) on a modest salary but it was a stretch. I bought the modern version of that watch new in 1992 for $2000. If I increase $800 every 10 years that would increase the cost to $4400. There is no way inflation should have increased that watch to double the $4400. As a senior in high school nearly 30 years ago coming up with 2K was a stretch but not an impossibility. Buying one even for retail today as a senior in high school would be nearly impossible unless mommy and daddy were buying it. Things have most certainly changed with Rolex even before the craziness of today.
|
11 August 2019, 01:38 AM | #81 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Missouri USA
Watch: Daytona C white
Posts: 2,248
|
Quote:
I would love to find a mint vintage Bulova Astronaut of that era. |
|
11 August 2019, 03:34 AM | #82 | |||
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,256
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Your knowledge regarding Rolex is amazing. Your contributions are always wonderful!!! Blessings be on you!!! |
|||
11 August 2019, 05:57 AM | #83 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: N/A
Posts: 271
|
*****
I was 35 years old when I could afford my 1st Rolex...... In 1978 I purchased a new 1675 GMT Master.....with 40% discount..... at a Dutch AD for nett $ 520,-; wearing it for 41 years and purchasing 4 more Rolexes. That time I could chose between a manual wind Daytona 6263 with Valjoux caliber, an Explorer II 1655 and the 1675 GMT all for the same (nett) price and all with 3 weeks delivery time. That time the Daytona was my last choice because it was a hand wind watch and not automatic... I still have the 100% complete package (incl. purchase invoice) of my unpolished, fully original 1978 Rolex 1675 GMT Master.....plastic glass and inlay of course never replaced......it is for my son. |
11 August 2019, 10:24 AM | #84 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: California/Malaga
Watch: GShock Frogman
Posts: 540
|
Okami:
To me this is rare and commendable. Just be careful about igniting the Cohiba around all that precious paperwork. Best. |
11 August 2019, 10:53 AM | #85 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
Quote:
__________________
If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4. |
|
3 March 2020, 05:26 PM | #86 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 4
|
Just another data point... YG/SS GMT Rootbeer, 1675. $450 new in August 1972.
SS DateJust was $295 I believe. |
3 March 2020, 06:31 PM | #87 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: AZ
Watch: a few
Posts: 1,068
|
That is why I buy Gold bullion and silver modern numismatic every month. Great hedge, easy to travel with and convert into cash if need arose or depression hits. If you put 1200 bucks in a bank today and leave it there for 20 years the intrest does not keep in line with the acquisition power it had 20 years ago. Gold and silver surpass it be leaps an bounds every time.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk |
3 March 2020, 06:42 PM | #88 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: England
Posts: 1,420
|
These comparisons will own work if people are buying exactly the same watch made from the same materials and design and research costs .
I'd guess that a modern Rolex has a lot more relatively mainly due to these factors due to these factors |
3 March 2020, 06:46 PM | #89 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: AZ
Watch: a few
Posts: 1,068
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk |
|
3 March 2020, 06:46 PM | #90 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Real Name: Simon
Location: Wales
Watch: whichever I wear
Posts: 830
|
Looking at back in the day prices, they did seem more affordable. Another difference money wise is that if you earn for example £/$10 an hour now, back then it might have only been 3.50 so basically they might have been cheaper but people earned less (basically some people may have still found it expensive back then)
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.