ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 September 2014, 06:53 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: Mountains
Watch: ALS, AP, PP, Rolex
Posts: 2,900
|
Anyone looking to sell their Rolexes at 70% off now before they plummet to 80% off, PM me. I'm a buyer.
|
10 September 2014, 06:57 AM | #62 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Watch: 116610 , 16233
Posts: 1,802
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
10 September 2014, 07:08 AM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Marc
Location: New york
Watch: SD43,d-Blue, 16710
Posts: 1,010
|
While I'm a bit underwhelmed after following Tim's presentation, the wrist is some pretty valuable real estate. Not too shabby for a "first generation" device as far as a more practical solution (versus pulling your phone out of your pocket every time there's a buzz). The ability to pay for stuff and serve as a bio metric capture device is also interesting when looking at the numbers of folks wearing fuel bands, up bands and the like.
I suspect that within a few years and two or three more revisions, a significant % of smart phone using folks will be finding this concept as appealing |
10 September 2014, 07:55 AM | #64 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
|
Ask any person who doesn't wear a watch why and they'll say "because I can just check my iPhone." How does this same logic not play out here? Everything the apple watch does my iPhone will do as well, and much more conveniently I'm willing to bet
|
10 September 2014, 08:23 AM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Phoenix
Watch: GMT Master II
Posts: 227
|
Not only the above, but since you have to have an iPhone with you for the thing to work, the convenience of the watch is even less. Now you have to carry your iPhone for your watch to work.
|
10 September 2014, 08:25 AM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Capt Swerve
Location: North Carolina
Watch: less TV
Posts: 2,224
|
This subject has been beat to death. The truth is that smartwatches have a completely different appeal than mechanical watches. Thus, the two types can coexist and our friends in Switzerland, Japan and Germany can sleep well. Anybody who believes otherwise should help himself to a book on business strategies.
|
10 September 2014, 08:37 AM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 2,122
|
The pebble design is very "1st gen-ish". Will certainly pass on it.
IMO, most of the concepts trumps it, especially this: |
10 September 2014, 08:45 AM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Dan O
Location: Park City, UT
Watch: Cosmograph Daytona
Posts: 741
|
Seems the apple device we is not a watch in the sense that I think of it. Instead it is a wearable computing device worn on the wrist, and oh by the way it can tell time. Honestly don't see any reason to talk about it on this section of TRF.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
-Dan, WIS In Training 116520 Cosmograph Daytona 116622 & 16622 Yacht-Master 114060 & 14060 Submariner |
10 September 2014, 08:49 AM | #69 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New Mexico
Watch: SeaDweller
Posts: 224
|
Tethering (requiring an iphone) makes it no longer a watch, but an iphone accessory
(like a bluetooth headset). Totally different market. |
10 September 2014, 10:29 AM | #70 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Ontario,Canada
Posts: 100
|
What is the point of the iwatch if it needs the iPhone to operate. I was under the impression it could replace my iPhone. Just lost interest.
|
10 September 2014, 10:40 AM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SF Bay and Tahoe
Watch: RB GMT II 3186
Posts: 272
|
that's next , later in the decade ...but in the mean time , the consumer first needs to get conditioned to using wrist devices ( albeit tethered )
|
10 September 2014, 10:49 AM | #72 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
|
Quote:
One other thing - did Apple make any sort of claim about the battery life of this new device? Interesting that I've not heard this being addressed.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints. |
|
10 September 2014, 10:50 AM | #73 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Ozone
Watch: DD, DJ, SubC Date
Posts: 1,666
|
Oh, PUHLEEZE! Those "things" will fail ultimately to attract even non-WIS types. It's a fad, but a redundant one since most of the folks comprising the potential market have time sources on their phones and tablets. Moreover, the watches themselves are too small for any meaningful use; IMHO, they will not be able to compete with existing devices. Fortunately for we TRFers, the whole concept is a moot point ... Thank the good Lord.
|
10 September 2014, 11:28 AM | #74 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 808
|
I don't think it's a fad, but I can't see it putting a dent in the high-end wristwatch segment. I can however see one of the major watch brands jumping in with Apple to produce something that appeals to tech geeks and WIS's. If you can't use it as a phone without actually carrying a phone around with you, then I'm not sure it's much more than a glorified workout monitor. Even with a phone, you either need headphones or you have to walk around talking on the speakerphone, which annoys me to no end when I see it.
I do admire the styling and the thought that they put into the strap system and straps they're offering, and the "crown" interface is quite well done. The one thing that could get me to buy one just to play with it would be if someone offered apps that would recreate the dials of classic watches. You have to admit it would be pretty cool to switch between a Paul Newman Daytona dial to a Patek Nautilus or a vintage Panerai! I suspect a lot of the success will ultimately depend on pricing. The carrier contracts subsidize a large part of the iPhone pricing structure, and the Watch will have to stand on it's own as far as price. The younger generation who doesn't wear a watch now probably isn't going to spend $400-500 for one of these, in addition to the $300-400 that most everyone ends up spending every few years for a new phone. The Android-based "smart watches" have pretty much bombed in the marketplace, in spite of the fact that the Android operating system has made huge gains agains Apple iOS. The wild-card is that this thing is Apple, and that brand is capable of getting consumers to part with ridiculous amounts of money for products that more or less do what competitive products that sell for significantly less do, and that is practically magic. |
10 September 2014, 11:30 AM | #75 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
|
No way!
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe |
10 September 2014, 11:35 AM | #76 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NC
Watch: 16610
Posts: 420
|
This will be the most popular dial..... You can show everyone Uranus
__________________
His 16610 E serial Her's 178240 Z Serial Salmon Dial Roman Markers 178344 Random Serial MOP Dial Diamond 6/Bezel 114210 M Serial Blue 3-6-9 Sticks 115200/210 M Serial Black / White Dial Stick Markers |
10 September 2014, 11:42 AM | #77 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 808
|
|
10 September 2014, 11:42 AM | #78 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
|
Does anyone know what time it is? I'm charging my rolex
Said no one ever |
10 September 2014, 11:52 AM | #79 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 808
|
i kind of feel the same way about real breasts...
|
10 September 2014, 11:53 AM | #80 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: flv
Location: asia
Posts: 241
|
Utmost redundancy to have an iPhone and an Apple Watch. Having an iPhone (or any smart phone) on hand, and a Rolex on your wrist is still the best combo, IMHO.
|
10 September 2014, 02:11 PM | #81 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Joe
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Daytona + GMT BLNR
Posts: 4,558
|
I phone in my pocket, MacBook Pro on my desk.....Rolex or Panerai on my wrist.
|
10 September 2014, 02:22 PM | #82 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Sydney, HK
Watch: Daytona SS
Posts: 447
|
My Pocket is for the Phone and my Wrist is for the Watch.
__________________
Patek Philippe | Audemars Piguet | Vacheron Constantin | Rolex | Tudor | Grand Seiko | Baume & Mercier | Bamford London | Swatch x Omega | Swatch x Blancpain | Casio |
10 September 2014, 03:29 PM | #83 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New Mexico
Watch: SeaDweller
Posts: 224
|
Entry level is $349 in US. Bet the straps and bracelets are extra, as will be the
fancier models (gold plated!) Probably get to $600-700 easily. No indication of battery life yet; that's been a drawback for the other entries in the market. Minute repeater would be a fun app to write. |
10 September 2014, 05:25 PM | #84 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Here
Watch: GMT IIc
Posts: 363
|
Just another piece of disposable junk, with built in obsolescence. Pretty soon the gadgets will be using us.
__________________
GMT IIc, Damasko DA36, Tudor Date+Day, GS SBGT035 |
10 September 2014, 05:38 PM | #85 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Middle
Posts: 878
|
|
10 September 2014, 06:19 PM | #86 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,430
|
Yeah right... I would never get one of those smart watches.
|
10 September 2014, 06:31 PM | #87 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Richard
Location: UK
Watch: Milgauss GV
Posts: 1,611
|
Those smart watches are a mess. Why would I want to spend time tapping at my wrist all day. And if I want to know what the weather is doing I'll just look out of the window.
|
10 September 2014, 06:50 PM | #88 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 220
|
http://tumblr.hodinkee.com/post/9707...t-flint-center hmm, my watch does feel a little old fashioned today :) I'm sure I'll get over it. There is something to be said for simplicity. A lot of fear and denial around the various forums and blogs today, quite amusing.
|
10 September 2014, 08:11 PM | #89 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Richard
Location: LV, NV
Watch: LV Sub and others
Posts: 2,689
|
1st Gen Iwatch no way to soon to jump on that band wagon, get rid of my Rolex watches, not in this lifetime. Is the smart watch the future yes.
The aps (possibilities) are endless. Medical aps to monitor your health, detect disease in early stages, alarm aps to arm your home alarm systems, keyless aps to start your car, monitor car issues, repairs , track your kids with their watches, there is some serious money to be made here. Why not? What worries me are the future generations, if they don't see a use for mechanical watches or if they are viewed as obsolete then Rolex must adapt or die. We are Rolex buyers for the next 30 years, as we start to die off, or have limited incomes (retired not working) we will not be buyers for Rolex. Besides who knows if a SS Sub is $17,000 in the next 20 to 30 years Rolex will have put themselves out of business. IMHO
__________________
Always working...by choice |
10 September 2014, 08:33 PM | #90 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: John
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 1953 pre explorer
Posts: 2,758
|
Being in my twenties I have to say real watches aren't going anywhere. I have more and more friends doing what I did 4 yrs ago and getting rid of their TVs. I don't mean canceling cable but actually selling their TVs. We keep internet and smart phones but but buck tv and such. We are slowly leading more active lifestyles. Smart watches are not built for that. They are not as robust as a sub or GSAR etc. I think you will see a sub-set of us with them but the bulk will retain a regular watch even if only a Timex
Sent from my C771 using Tapatalk 2 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.