ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

rushca01 · 12 June 2018, 05:38 AM

Just took my 116610 on numerous dives this last week including a night dive that was a little sketchy to say the least...(heavy current, unfamiliar conditions, etc..).

So after the abuse it took this week my vote is the 116610 which is exactly why I bought it.

Second place would be a 16600 sea dweller but they are becoming a bit more rare.

Shot while I wait to leave tomorrow from Hurricane torn tortolla.

Donaldkrama · 12 June 2018, 05:51 AM

It will most certainly be the Explorer 11, do not see any other watch apart from that.

Anhjonson · 12 June 2018, 05:53 AM

I misplaced my sub booklet how can I get an replace thanks

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Anhjonson · 12 June 2018, 05:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rushca01

Just took my 116610 on numerous dives this last week including a night dive that was a little sketchy to say the least...(heavy current, unfamiliar conditions, etc..).

So after the abuse it took this week my vote is the 116610 which is exactly why I bought it.

Second place would be a 16600 sea dweller but they are becoming a bit more rare.

Shot while I wait to leave tomorrow from Hurricane torn tortolla.

Nice

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Chi-man · 12 June 2018, 05:59 AM

Sub

Gary. · 12 June 2018, 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Finslayer83

Backstory? Looks fixable

I believe the Ebay jargon for that is "Some signs of wear on a small section of the bezel."

Maximilian224 · 12 June 2018, 07:58 AM

114060 to me is the one :) and i just bought it lately

Gary. · 12 June 2018, 08:00 AM

Explorer II is my answer.
All of the others have gradually shifted their characters towards elegance and/or luxury whereas the ExpII has, if anything, become more focused and utilitarian in its latest iteration.

BlueAZ · 13 June 2018, 02:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anhjonson

I misplaced my sub booklet how can I get an replace thanks

20 bucks

https://www.qualitytyme.net/pages/ac...cessories.html

SeaAndSky · 13 June 2018, 09:33 AM

Most “tooly?” Isn’t it a tie between all references? A watch is built for one reason and one reason only. To tell time. Does one refer ce do this any better than these others?

tjfslaughter · 13 June 2018, 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Finslayer83

Backstory? Looks fixable

Motorcycle road rash?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

12 June 2018, 05:38 AM	#91
rushca01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: Indiana Watch: GMT BLRO Posts: 1,742	most tooly rolex watches Just took my 116610 on numerous dives this last week including a night dive that was a little sketchy to say the least...(heavy current, unfamiliar conditions, etc..). So after the abuse it took this week my vote is the 116610 which is exactly why I bought it. Second place would be a 16600 sea dweller but they are becoming a bit more rare. Shot while I wait to leave tomorrow from Hurricane torn tortolla.

12 June 2018, 05:51 AM	#92
Donaldkrama Banned Join Date: Apr 2017 Location: Usa Posts: 103	It will most certainly be the Explorer 11, do not see any other watch apart from that.

12 June 2018, 05:53 AM	#93
Anhjonson "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2018 Location: Virginia Posts: 90	I misplaced my sub booklet how can I get an replace thanks Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

12 June 2018, 05:59 AM	#95
Chi-man "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2017 Location: irvine Posts: 22	Sub

12 June 2018, 07:58 AM	#97
Maximilian224 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2018 Location: Earth Posts: 2	114060 to me is the one :) and i just bought it lately

12 June 2018, 08:00 AM	#98
Gary. "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Italy Posts: 397	Explorer II is my answer. All of the others have gradually shifted their characters towards elegance and/or luxury whereas the ExpII has, if anything, become more focused and utilitarian in its latest iteration.

13 June 2018, 09:33 AM	#100
SeaAndSky "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Wild Blue Yonder Watch: 116710 LN Posts: 1,613	Most “tooly?” Isn’t it a tie between all references? A watch is built for one reason and one reason only. To tell time. Does one refer ce do this any better than these others?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)