The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 December 2021, 05:12 AM   #91
Cobar65
"TRF" Member
 
Cobar65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Real Name: Everett
Location: Europe
Watch: Vintage only
Posts: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaintMickey View Post
I can't remember a post about it. Love to see some broke ceramic bezels...that'd be fun!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=659906


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
1986 Rolex 16750 GMT
1963 Rolex 5504 Air King
1966 Tudor 7928 Submariner




Regards,
Everett

Two-Factor Authentication enabled
Cobar65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2021, 05:15 AM   #92
Cobar65
"TRF" Member
 
Cobar65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Real Name: Everett
Location: Europe
Watch: Vintage only
Posts: 231
Am I the only one who thinks Rolex has moved away from its roots?

https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/w...5281605/page-3
__________________
1986 Rolex 16750 GMT
1963 Rolex 5504 Air King
1966 Tudor 7928 Submariner




Regards,
Everett

Two-Factor Authentication enabled
Cobar65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2021, 05:16 AM   #93
SaintMickey
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 885
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobar65 View Post
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=659906


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well not as "fun" as I imagined but the OP did that himself. Not really from a wall or door jamb. That's one example I just don't rememberer many claiming they are "fragile" from normal use.
SaintMickey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2021, 05:17 AM   #94
CarlOver
"TRF" Member
 
CarlOver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: US
Posts: 1,956
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobar65 View Post
I bought a 124060 a couple of months ago and just got rid of it a couple of days ago. I thought I could wear it as I used to wear my 5513; this couldn’t have been further from the truth. I wound up wearing a blingy mugger magnet on my wrist that was not only blindingly shiny, but it’s in no way a tool watch. I think I now know how big-busted women must feel when being talked to while having their cleavage stared upon during the conversation.

I’ve worn watches four times as expensive on my wrist and never a glance, but this 41mm hunk of 904L steel was like wearing a stainless steel dinner plate on my wrist.

Never again will I buy some ceramic “tool watch” I’ll stick with vintage which not only flys under the radar, but…well, it’s vintage, need I say more?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Seems like maybe it was still too shiny and new and you felt subconscious. In Europe maybe the threat of theft is higher but this time of year how would anyone know what you have on your wrist unless you are purposefully trying to show it off.
CarlOver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2021, 05:19 AM   #95
Cobar65
"TRF" Member
 
Cobar65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Real Name: Everett
Location: Europe
Watch: Vintage only
Posts: 231
No crime where I live mate. :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
1986 Rolex 16750 GMT
1963 Rolex 5504 Air King
1966 Tudor 7928 Submariner




Regards,
Everett

Two-Factor Authentication enabled
Cobar65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2021, 05:19 AM   #96
BroncoOne
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,244
Given that Rolex makes such infinitesimal changes to its watches over the decades and 99.9% of the population can’t tell the difference between older and newer references, I’m going with “no.”
BroncoOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2021, 05:20 AM   #97
Cobar65
"TRF" Member
 
Cobar65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Real Name: Everett
Location: Europe
Watch: Vintage only
Posts: 231
Simple Google search you can find hundreds of cases of this happening.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
1986 Rolex 16750 GMT
1963 Rolex 5504 Air King
1966 Tudor 7928 Submariner




Regards,
Everett

Two-Factor Authentication enabled
Cobar65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2021, 05:23 AM   #98
Meyrin
"TRF" Member
 
Meyrin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Ian
Location: Hamburg
Watch: Sub 14060
Posts: 1,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeaDweller50 View Post
Can you define flimsy? My 16600 is anything but flimsy, in fact it’s built like a tank. The weakest point being the springbars and they’ve not changed in the last 50 odd years. With that said I would suggest the 5 digit Milsub is the least flimsy Rolex ever.
I certainly agree with you, SeaDweller50! My old 14060 (my everyday watch) has been dropped and smashed about all over the world for the last 25+ years, and she's still ticking. Anything but flimsy! That said, the new 6 digits are probably even tougher...but I´ve not had one on my wrist yet nor have I handled one. But the old 5-digits are definitely NOT flimsy in my books! And despite what some might say about the jingly-jangly old 93150 bracelet it has held up all these years with no problems. I love it!
Meyrin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2021, 05:29 AM   #99
Cobar65
"TRF" Member
 
Cobar65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Real Name: Everett
Location: Europe
Watch: Vintage only
Posts: 231
The 1680s I’ve had and 5513s, 94200 Big Blocks were hard as nails. My 16750 is a beast. Tough as nails and no need for ceramic.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
1986 Rolex 16750 GMT
1963 Rolex 5504 Air King
1966 Tudor 7928 Submariner




Regards,
Everett

Two-Factor Authentication enabled
Cobar65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2021, 05:44 AM   #100
Cobar65
"TRF" Member
 
Cobar65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Real Name: Everett
Location: Europe
Watch: Vintage only
Posts: 231

This I really miss.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
1986 Rolex 16750 GMT
1963 Rolex 5504 Air King
1966 Tudor 7928 Submariner




Regards,
Everett

Two-Factor Authentication enabled
Cobar65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2021, 06:05 AM   #101
russeree
"TRF" Member
 
russeree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Oregon
Watch: 214270
Posts: 337
Rolex absolutely has strayed from it's roots, not a bad thing but instead of being a great tool watch, they are a great luxury watch that could be used as a tool. Though most owners wont because they want to keep the equity value of their watches high.

If a man makes enough money he could go mountaineering with his explorer and it would do the job just as well as a classic Rolex.
russeree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2021, 06:08 AM   #102
Cobar65
"TRF" Member
 
Cobar65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Real Name: Everett
Location: Europe
Watch: Vintage only
Posts: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by russeree View Post
Rolex absolutely has strayed from it's roots, not a bad thing but instead of being a great tool watch, they are a great luxury watch that could be used as a tool. Though most owners wont because they want to keep the equity value of their watches high.

If a man makes enough money he could go mountaineering with his explorer and it would do the job just as well as a classic Rolex.



This


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
1986 Rolex 16750 GMT
1963 Rolex 5504 Air King
1966 Tudor 7928 Submariner




Regards,
Everett

Two-Factor Authentication enabled
Cobar65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.