The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex WatchTech

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 September 2011, 11:15 PM   #151
Rags
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,191
I've been following this thread closely & I would give him a chance to redeem himself. If in fact he does send you another bracelet & it's not 100% to your liking then I would absolutely use the power of the internet to make sure everyone knows what kind of businessman he is. I always google a business name or a persons name before I do any kind of business with them.
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust
16610 Z Serial Submariner
214270 Explorer

114300 Oyster Perpetual
76200 Tudor Date+Day
Rags is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2011, 09:52 PM   #152
StJamesSq
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 9
Just for the avoidance of any doubt, can you tell us if the bracelet in question is related in any way to the bracelet fitted to the watch you say you sold (http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=193066) a few days ago?

There are uncanny resemblances between the photos you have submitted in this thread (http://www.rolexforums.com/showpost....7&postcount=40) and those used in the ‘for sale’ listing.
StJamesSq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2011, 12:54 AM   #153
Puffy
"TRF" Member
 
Puffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by StJamesSq View Post
Just for the avoidance of any doubt, can you tell us if the bracelet in question is related in any way to the bracelet fitted to the watch you say you sold (http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=193066) a few days ago?

There are uncanny resemblances between the photos you have submitted in this thread (http://www.rolexforums.com/showpost....7&postcount=40) and those used in the ‘for sale’ listing.
how did this end then?
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten
Puffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2011, 01:04 AM   #154
drtooth73
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
update?
drtooth73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2011, 01:10 AM   #155
crombie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 246
Quote:
Originally Posted by StJamesSq View Post
Just for the avoidance of any doubt, can you tell us if the bracelet in question is related in any way to the bracelet fitted to the watch you say you sold (http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=193066) a few days ago?

There are uncanny resemblances between the photos you have submitted in this thread (http://www.rolexforums.com/showpost....7&postcount=40) and those used in the ‘for sale’ listing.

I guess it wasn't a 'pos' replacement. If this is the same one, looks pretty good in the fs photos....
crombie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2011, 01:33 AM   #156
zeuloa
"TRF" Member
 
zeuloa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Jose
Location: Here
Watch: SEA-DWELLER
Posts: 2,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by StJamesSq View Post
Just for the avoidance of any doubt, can you tell us if the bracelet in question is related in any way to the bracelet fitted to the watch you say you sold (http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=193066) a few days ago?

There are uncanny resemblances between the photos you have submitted in this thread (http://www.rolexforums.com/showpost....7&postcount=40) and those used in the ‘for sale’ listing.
Interesting... That clasp has the same exact markings - it looks to be the same to me... This is getting good!
zeuloa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2011, 01:43 AM   #157
Welshwatchman
"TRF" Member
 
Welshwatchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
POS replacement in this thread.



FS Listing with POS replacement bracelet fitted?



Certainly seems so.

It may have been a sensible idea to at least disclose the "less than perfect" nature of the bracelet in the listing.

Buyer beware I guess.
__________________
..33
Welshwatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2011, 01:43 AM   #158
StJamesSq
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 9
I think it really has to be the same bracelet. In the ‘For Sale’ listing, there are 6 photos. No 5 shows that an outside link is missing from the bracelet – in exactly the same position as a missing outside link shown in a photo in the thread about MY!

Is the OP saying that the replacement bracelet is not good enough to accept, but is good enough to sell?

I hesitate before saying that the OP has been disingenuous, but I would feel happier if I felt I knew the whole story.

It is of course regrettable if Michael Young has lost a client’s bracelet, but I do feel that it is slightly unfair to trash his reputation without the most careful consideration.
StJamesSq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2011, 01:48 AM   #159
ericdube
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Katherine
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: DJ, Sub-C, Daytona
Posts: 218
I wouldn't be surprised if the OP got tired of dealing with the issue and decided to just sell the watch instead. It sounds like this has been dragging on for a long time. To be perfectly honest, I'd probably do the same thing.

Also, he may have disclosed the bracelet issue to the buyer when he purchased it. Unfortunately, this isn't something anyone would know.
ericdube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2011, 03:05 AM   #160
Palakiko
"TRF" Member
 
Palakiko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Francisco
Location: sunny Ca (norCal)
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 193
my oh my. just browsed through this thread and this is like a soap opera
Palakiko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2011, 02:59 AM   #161
Rose1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Roland Rose
Location: Sagle, Idaho
Watch: DateJust
Posts: 3
I'm wondering why all of a sudden there has not been an outcome reply from Silvershark. I too want to send MY a DateJust to restore but now I'm leary to do so. I hope Silvershark posts a final outcome.

Last edited by Rose1; 30 September 2011 at 04:00 AM.. Reason: Poor grammar
Rose1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 07:09 PM   #162
boxbrownie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 44
I only just noticed this thread and read every post, such an interesting and now towards the end disturbingly odd story, it would indeed be nice to hear from the OP as to the resolution or otherwise, and the reason for the apparent sale of the band and watch.

As to MY's service, I sent him my 1977 jubilee 14K TT on the 3rd June this year, I had an email when he picked it up from his post office. I waited patiently (was told approx 12 week turn around as he was very busy) and I recieved the jubilee back on the 22nd September (24hr post from HK).

I am totally amazed at the restoration, before I could literally turn the band "inside out" and now it is looking almost as new.

I have collegues at work here who were awaiting the outcome of my restoration before sending thier bands of to MY, now I am not so sure whether to recommend him of not.....more NOT I feel, such a shame as its a rare talent he has and that has now been blown to bits by apparently one stupidly dealt with cock-up!

Best regards David
boxbrownie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 09:51 PM   #163
Dickson Lim
"TRF" Member
 
Dickson Lim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: planet
Posts: 1,517
Wow just find out this thread. Hope the latest replacement sort all of the things out.
Dickson Lim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 12:23 PM   #164
Galaxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: OUT THERE
Posts: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by silvershark View Post
Well I guess I'll just have to wait and see what happens. I'll give him a few more days to do the right thing!! If not the internet is a mighty powerful tool for totally destroying reputations and giving folks all kinds of hassle.

BTW, his websites feedback page has mysteriously vanished lol!

On his web page he states that as 'receiver' when sending him something put:

'Young Michael Chung Kit'.

Just for curosity what is his real name?
Galaxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 01:17 PM   #165
watchf
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welshwatchman View Post
POS replacement in this thread.



FS Listing with POS replacement bracelet fitted?



Certainly seems so.

It may have been a sensible idea to at least disclose the "less than perfect" nature of the bracelet in the listing.

Buyer beware I guess.
I had a look at the FS posting and the OP did not mention anything about the issue with the bracelet at all in the listing and its SOLD. I hope the buyer knew and the OP did inform buyer of the issue.
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=193066
watchf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 01:36 PM   #166
The Godzilla
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 200
so who's the bad guy now?
The Godzilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 02:19 PM   #167
MY-WATCH
"TRF" Member
 
MY-WATCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sala hu din
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,758
Woooooooow read all 6 pages and just at the last page i feel confused
MY-WATCH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 October 2011, 07:46 PM   #168
nch209
"TRF" Member
 
nch209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Nathan
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 2,775
uhhhhhh, me too.
__________________
nch209
nch209 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2011, 12:38 AM   #169
StJamesSq
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 9
One more uncertainty concerns the exact specification of the bracelet that the OP sent to Hong Kong in the first place. When I look at a thread he started when he originally bought the watch ( http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=162766 ) I see that there was some considerable doubt that the bracelet was a Rolex-made item; the thread title is ‘Is my bracelet authentic Rolex?’. I would summarise the answer given as ‘probably not’. It appears that the bracelet was a combination of clasp A, bracelet B and end-pieces C.

If this was the bracelet sent to Hong Kong for work (and we haven’t been told either way), you might argue that the bracelet supplied in return is in fact a fair replacement.

Let me stress again that I don’t think losing a client’s bracelet is a good thing, but I do believe that the OP could do with making a full and frank disclosure of all the issues before seeking the support of forum members in his campaign against Michael Young.
StJamesSq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2011, 03:14 AM   #170
StJamesSq
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 9
silvershark hasn't posted here since 21 September, and he hasn't posted on TURF (where he's TOG1625) since 15 September. It looks like we are not going to get any further explanation about his complaint; possibly he has sold the stuff that was troubling him.

I regret that these six pages have not really added much to our knowledge about bracelet repairs, but I am content that I know where to go if the RSC solution is too expensive.
StJamesSq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2011, 08:56 PM   #171
eelpie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 15223, 6305/2
Posts: 583
I sent my Jubilee bracelet to Michael Young in mid-September . . .

On 8 September I informed Michael Young that I had obtained the additional links I had needed for my bracelet's restoration, and that the bracelet was ready to mail. I asked him if there were any special mailing instructions other than the address he had provided me.

On 12 September, when he had not responded, I mailed the packet as previously instructed.

On 15 September, three days after I'd mailed the bracelet, Michael Young responded, saying, "Sorry we are not taking new orders at the moment. Have a nice one."

I immediately answered with, "It will be very difficult for me to "have a nice one" since I mailed the bracelet to you three days ago . . ."

He then said, "Don’t worry we shall still do this one then." That was 15 September, and I have heard nothing since I got the USPS delivery confirmation showing the bracelet arrived at the Hong Kong address at 6:24 PM on 21 September.

On 27 September I asked Mr. Young if he fore-saw any problems with the restoration of my Jubilee bracelet. I never received a response.

It has now been 9 of the projected 10 weeks required to restore my bracelet, and the watch for which it is meant is almost ready at my watchmaker's shop.

I contacted Mr. Young last night about the progress on my bracelet, and as on 27 September, I have received no response.

It may be too early to be overly concerned, but I always worry when someone doesn't respond to contacts, and doubly so when that person is 10,000 miles away and is in possession of my vintage Rolex bracelet.
eelpie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2011, 01:04 AM   #172
joeychitwood
"TRF" Member
 
joeychitwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Way Up North USA
Watch: Rolexes & Tudors
Posts: 6,361
I dealt with a maker of custom carbon fiber Ducati bits who practiced the same atrocious customer service tactics as Michael Young. When push came to shove, the CF maker knew that he was one of the few people around who performed such work, and if I didn't like it, I could go find someone else to make my dash surrounds. He ultimately completed my parts when he felt like it, communicated only minimally, and the parts were perfect.

I would not use either Young or the CF maker in the future, but I understand their "business practices."
joeychitwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2011, 01:32 AM   #173
eelpie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 15223, 6305/2
Posts: 583
The good news is, I am not without recourse . . .

A forum like this is an excellent way to spread the word about a person or business that is not up to standards, and I would be surprised if Mr. Young didn't take the occasional peek at this board.

In addition, there are governmental and law enforcement agencies in China that would not take it lightly if Rolex bracelets were not returned to customers abroad.

I have a journalism back-ground, and while I may have lost a step between the paddock and the pits, I am still certainly capable of filling the air with missives to agencies in Hong Kong if push comes to shove.

It is my fervent hope that Mr. Young puts in an appearance, and soon, but if he doesn't I am prepared to take whatever steps necessary to reach a satisfactory resolution . . .
eelpie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2011, 02:28 AM   #174
Mickey®
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
If you look back you will see an email where Michael emailed me saying he is so busy he would no longer be taking orders from individuals. He must be refurb for companies only now?


He will answer sooner or later hopefully if not to get payment to return your bracelet.
Mickey® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2011, 02:36 AM   #175
eelpie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 15223, 6305/2
Posts: 583
I would never have mailed the bracelet . . .

. . . had I known he was booked up.

I waited more four days for a response to my 8 September query about shipping and when that was not forth-coming, I mailed to the address he'd already provided.

When he learned I'd mailed the bracelet, he then agreed to do the work.

I am less bothed by the delay than by the absence of commnication . . .
eelpie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2011, 02:46 AM   #176
Mickey®
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by eelpie View Post
. . . had I known he was booked up.

I waited more four days for a response to my 8 September query about shipping and when that was not forth-coming, I mailed to the address he'd already provided.

When he learned I'd mailed the bracelet, he then agreed to do the work.

I am less bothed by the delay than by the absence of commnication . . .
That's been the main complaint...its a matter of priorities I guess.
Customer with 1 or with 50...

Never understood why people can't reply to emails...its so easy.
Mickey® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2011, 02:51 AM   #177
eelpie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 15223, 6305/2
Posts: 583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickey® View Post
Never understood why people can't reply to emails...its so easy.
That really is the bottom line. It would take all of 15 seconds to tap out, "Bracelet received, will advise" or "repair delayed, return in 30 days".

Unresponsiveness can make a good business-person appear indifferent . . .
eelpie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2011, 01:23 AM   #178
Treetopflyer
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 24
wow! the usual suspects...

last time i saw a twist like this kevin spacey turned out to be Keyser Soze!!

Oh My!!
Treetopflyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2011, 01:33 AM   #179
316lad
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 1,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treetopflyer View Post
last time i saw a twist like this kevin spacey turned out to be Keyser Soze!!

Oh My!!
Hang on a minute - he wasn't Keyser Soze - That was the guy in the dressing gown in the cabin on the boat who wasn't the Hungarian that Verbal was talking about, that Redfoot got the call from, wasn't it...

Damn, going to have to watch it for the 327th time...
316lad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 December 2011, 01:44 AM   #180
eelpie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 15223, 6305/2
Posts: 583
If we could get away from 'The Usual Suspects' for a moment . . .

. . . I have just asked Mr. Young about the status on my bracelet for the second time in three days.

If I do not have a response in 5 business days I will be forced to escalate the matter with the authorities in Hong Kong.

There is patience, and there is sitting idly by while something unseemly is unfolding . . .
eelpie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.