ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Safetrends · 28 December 2009, 02:14 PM

Were not in Kansas anymore Toto.

and loving it.

deserted · 28 December 2009, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnEaton

22 posts in less than an hour in one thread in perhaps the "deadest" of sections in TRF has too be a record Sean (if that is really your name)

Anyway I would love to watch you and my part time go at it for ten minutes, it would probably be a "most viewed" on you tube.

John i'm not mad at this guy after all it's just a forum , but i'm not walking around denying nothing either, this guy has called me decitful and a liar in less than five minutes now if he's so scholastically sophisticated maybe he should have did his homework before he decided to post.

Stay in your lane kiddo! don't swim with a whale you might get swallowed

Safetrends · 28 December 2009, 02:17 PM

Everyone lets be civil about this (get it civil:))

I really forgot what this started out as......

Oh a million dollar watch of some sort.

Pesky sky moon that is it now I remember, OMG mind fart again.

rpryan55 · 28 December 2009, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deserted

John i'm not mad at this guy after all it's just a forum , but i'm not walking around denying nothing either, this guy has called me decitful and a liar in less than five minutes now if he's so scholastically sophisticated maybe he should have did his homework before he decided to post.

Stay in your lane kiddo! don't swim with a whale you might get swallowed

Deluded. I also called you "deluded". Try and keep up, okay?

Pep04 · 28 December 2009, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deserted

John i'm not mad at this guy after all it's just a forum , but i'm not walking around denying nothing either, this guy has called me decitful and a liar in less than five minutes now if he's so scholastically sophisticated maybe he should have did his homework before he decided to post.

Stay in your lane kiddo! don't swim with a whale you might get swallowed

Yo, homeboy, I've been playing devils advocate but seriously. I'm amusing you by following your flow of stories. But, my brotha, you need to write a if you were a lawyer. You have more grammatical than an 8th grader.

My cousin as well as my wife's close friend are lawyers and they obviously write extremely well. You misspell words and use double negatives very loosely.

No camera, no cellphone with camera, not even one of the friends that come over to drink with you over the holidays have cameras?

I think I can explain all of this.......

SEAN IS ON VACATIONS AND THIS MUST BE HIS KID OR NEPHEW!!!!!

It's the only thing that could make sense.

Mike B · 28 December 2009, 02:27 PM

Before this thread gets locked, figured I'd put my .02 cents in.
If I was the owner of said $1,000,000+ watch, then posting pictures here would be one of the FIRST things I'd do. But, then again, that's just me, and others might not have the same opinions on thier new watches. However, I also must call (BS) on this as well. If you started a topic on a very lovely, and (one of the most expensive watches out there) surely you must of thought that we'd like to see pictures of the watch. Not proof that you own it (well, OK, maybe a little lol) but just to show it off in general. If I just bought a 1 Million Dollar house, I'd post some pictures of it in the general discussion fourm, I'll tell you that :)
Either way, I must say I am very disappointed at the direction this board is heading. I've been a member here for almost 2 years, and have never seen the board come to "this new low".
As for this mystical watch, I agree with the others, and will leave it at that.

deserted · 28 December 2009, 02:31 PM

OMG that's it , good night all! i'm too through with this thread this truly is the funniest night i've had in a long time, you know dude you make me laugh.......

Safetrends · 28 December 2009, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike B

Before this thread gets locked, figured I'd put my .02 cents in.
If I was the owner of said $1,000,000+ watch, then posting pictures here would be one of the FIRST things I'd do. But, then again, that's just me, and others might not have the same opinions on thier new watches. However, I also must call (BS) on this as well. If you started a topic on a very lovely, and (one of the most expensive watches out there) surely you must of thought that we'd like to see pictures of the watch. Not proof that you own it (well, OK, maybe a little lol) but just to show it off in general. If I just bought a 1 Million Dollar house, I'd post some pictures of it in the general discussion fourm, I'll tell you that :)
Either way, I must say I am very disappointed at the direction this board is heading. I've been a member here for almost 2 years, and have never seen the board come to "this new low".
As for this mystical watch, I agree with the others, and will leave it at that.

Mike, I am the one for the bad jokes, even if I am staying out of the name calling, I agree I have been apart of this thread and it has gotten out of hand and the Mod should step in and lock it the point has been made and we will move on. Thanks for the heads up.

sushisummo · 28 December 2009, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deserted

OMG that's it , good night all! i'm too through with this thread this truly is the funniest night i've had in a long time, you know dude you make me laugh.......

deserted · 28 December 2009, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pep04

Yo, homeboy, I've been playing devils advocate but seriously. I'm amusing you by following your flow of stories. But, my brotha, you need to write a if you were a lawyer. You have more grammatical than an 8th grader.

My cousin as well as my wife's close friend are lawyers and they obviously write extremely well. You misspell words and use double negatives very loosely.

No camera, no cellphone with camera, not even one of the friends that come over to drink with you over the holidays have cameras?

I think I can explain all of this.......

SEAN IS ON VACATIONS AND THIS MUST BE HIS KID OR NEPHEW!!!!!

It's the only thing that could make sense.

FTR i'm a litigator my writing is terrible as well , i haven't out of 20 years of practicing law even typed my own motions , we have secretaries for that!

Pep04 · 28 December 2009, 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deserted

FTR i'm a litigator my writing is terrible as well , i haven't out of 20 years of practicing law even typed my own motions , we have secretaries for that!

Ok then point taken. I stand corrected.

Don't know what FTR means though.

JohnEaton · 28 December 2009, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike B

Before this thread gets locked, figured I'd put my .02 cents in.
If I was the owner of said $1,000,000+ watch, then posting pictures here would be one of the FIRST things I'd do. But, then again, that's just me, and others might not have the same opinions on thier new watches. However, I also must call (BS) on this as well. If you started a topic on a very lovely, and (one of the most expensive watches out there) surely you must of thought that we'd like to see pictures of the watch. Not proof that you own it (well, OK, maybe a little lol) but just to show it off in general. If I just bought a 1 Million Dollar house, I'd post some pictures of it in the general discussion fourm, I'll tell you that :)
Either way, I must say I am very disappointed at the direction this board is heading. I've been a member here for almost 2 years, and have never seen the board come to "this new low".
As for this mystical watch, I agree with the others, and will leave it at that.

AAHHHHHHH, the magical fifteen minutes are over

I know that blood coming out the ears is quite painful.

Just needed some comic relief, sorry to goad Chilvary past the "magic" point.

Shut down, reset

I guess we should all take a break, and Sean, I suggest you change your "watch" on your avatar before Stevo shows up, he has banned people for that that in the past.

Good night everyone, it was fun... See you tomorrow

kjb · 28 December 2009, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deserted

FTR i'm a litigator my writing is terrible as well , i haven't out of 20 years of practicing law even typed my own motions , we have secretaries for that!

I must admit my spelling is horrible too . My assistant checks everything for me.

Safetrends · 28 December 2009, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pep04

Ok then point taken. I stand corrected.

Don't know what FTR means though.

Legal talk For The Record, I have a background is this.

deserted · 28 December 2009, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pep04

Ok then point taken. I stand corrected.

Don't know what FTR means though.

It just means " for the record " well that's it for me

Safetrends · 28 December 2009, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deserted

It just means " for the record " well that's it for me

I thought you went to bed.

deserted · 28 December 2009, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kjb

I must admit my spelling is horrible too . My assistant checks everything for me.

What area of practice are you in!!

rpryan55 · 28 December 2009, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deserted

It just means " for the record " well that's it for me

"Sean" is a lawyer in the same sense that he is a collector of fine watches. Don't suppose we can get a picture of your law licen.....aw, forget it!

sushisummo · 28 December 2009, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deserted

It just means " for the record " well that's it for me

Wait......that is what you said the last time. I want it in writting this time around............are you sure this is IT........

JohnEaton · 28 December 2009, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deserted

What area of practice are you in!!

Good night Sean, good night David, good night Johnboy

ducatidoc · 28 December 2009, 02:44 PM

What'd I miss ??

I was out polishing the ol' Phantom V. The psychedelic paint needs a lot of maintenance. Used to be owned by some British singer, whose name i forget.

It being dark here, I can't get a good photo, but here's one from last summer with my driver:

sushisummo · 28 December 2009, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rpryan55

"Sean" is a lawyer in the same sense that he is a collector of fine watches. Don't suppose we can get a picture of your law licen.....aw, forget it!

:r ofl:

kjb · 28 December 2009, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deserted

What area of practice are you in!!

O I am not a lawyer Sean. Just a poor speller

JJ Irani · 28 December 2009, 03:27 PM

I think I can summarise this whole bizarre situation......

First off, it would take a very, very wealthy man to even bid for such an expensive watch.

I mean real, real filthy rich........and I'm talking maybe someone like Bill Gates or the Sultan of Brunei or the King of Saudi Arabia or the Emir of UAE or maybe even some one like Donald Trump or Kerry Packer.

Of course, there are several billionaires around the world capable of picking up such a watch. With such people, it's NOT about the money (1.3 million bucks it's loose change in their back pockets) - it's more about the prestige of owning one and more about ONE UPMANSHIP in out-bidding the competition to have top dibs on it.

So let us say such a watch was available and only 2 were ever made, I don't see how a common layman could get even anywhere close to such a rare watch.

This whole thing has taken on such a weird and bizarre state of affairs, that it ceased to be funny a long time ago.

Sorry for the rant, but we are talking about a very huge amount of dollars coupled with rarity and availability of an extremely unique time-piece.

JJ

ducatidoc · 28 December 2009, 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

...........

This whole thing has taken on such a weird and bizarre state of affairs, that it ceased to be funny a long time ago.

JJ

Yeah, but you do like my car though, right ?

Good night , JJ !

JJ Irani · 28 December 2009, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ducatidoc

Yeah, but you do like my car though, right ?

Good night , JJ !

Yes, loved it, but wouldn't be seen dead in that monstrosity. Can I bid on it for my sheep though?

Safetrends · 28 December 2009, 04:04 PM

In regards to JJ's sheep. What goes on in JJ's bedroom stays in JJ's bedroom.

This is walter cronkite saying goodnight.

Psmith · 28 December 2009, 06:01 PM

The PP is nice, but I'm going for one of these babies instead...

http://www.gemnation.com/watches/Vac...9145-1177.html

Cheers

Bullyterrier · 28 December 2009, 08:12 PM

Well Deserted,
You have said you don't have a camera, but you managed to post a picture of your daytona on the 3rd of December, unless this is also a stock photo, you must of used a camera of some sorts.
Here is the thread.
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...77#post1485277

Alcan · 28 December 2009, 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rpryan55

I'm right here in Chicago!

Chicago, huh? Unless you post pix of it, Chicago doesn't exis...... Awww, forget it.

28 December 2009, 02:44 PM	#231
ducatidoc "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: the doc side Watch: zenith Posts: 3,779	What'd I miss ?? I was out polishing the ol' Phantom V. The psychedelic paint needs a lot of maintenance. Used to be owned by some British singer, whose name i forget. It being dark here, I can't get a good photo, but here's one from last summer with my driver: __________________ The payments remain long after the novelty has worn off. # 26371 NAWCC Member

28 December 2009, 03:27 PM	#234
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,320	I think I can summarise this whole bizarre situation...... First off, it would take a very, very wealthy man to even bid for such an expensive watch. I mean real, real filthy rich........and I'm talking maybe someone like Bill Gates or the Sultan of Brunei or the King of Saudi Arabia or the Emir of UAE or maybe even some one like Donald Trump or Kerry Packer. Of course, there are several billionaires around the world capable of picking up such a watch. With such people, it's NOT about the money (1.3 million bucks it's loose change in their back pockets) - it's more about the prestige of owning one and more about ONE UPMANSHIP in out-bidding the competition to have top dibs on it. So let us say such a watch was available and only 2 were ever made, I don't see how a common layman could get even anywhere close to such a rare watch. This whole thing has taken on such a weird and bizarre state of affairs, that it ceased to be funny a long time ago. Sorry for the rant, but we are talking about a very huge amount of dollars coupled with rarity and availability of an extremely unique time-piece. JJ __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

28 December 2009, 06:01 PM	#238
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	The PP is nice, but I'm going for one of these babies instead... http://www.gemnation.com/watches/Vac...9145-1177.html Cheers __________________

28 December 2009, 08:12 PM	#239
Bullyterrier "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: . Posts: 1,343	Well Deserted, You have said you don't have a camera, but you managed to post a picture of your daytona on the 3rd of December, unless this is also a stock photo, you must of used a camera of some sorts. Here is the thread. http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...77#post1485277 __________________ So Mote it be.

28 December 2009, 02:17 PM	#213
Safetrends Banned Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: David Walz Location: San Diego CA USA Watch: my hand. :) Posts: 9,156	Everyone lets be civil about this (get it civil:)) I really forgot what this started out as...... Oh a million dollar watch of some sort. Pesky sky moon that is it now I remember, OMG mind fart again.

28 December 2009, 02:27 PM	#216
Mike B "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Mike Location: Gilbert, AZ Watch: DSSD, Omega SMP Posts: 3,055	Before this thread gets locked, figured I'd put my .02 cents in. If I was the owner of said $1,000,000+ watch, then posting pictures here would be one of the FIRST things I'd do. But, then again, that's just me, and others might not have the same opinions on thier new watches. However, I also must call (BS) on this as well. If you started a topic on a very lovely, and (one of the most expensive watches out there) surely you must of thought that we'd like to see pictures of the watch. Not proof that you own it (well, OK, maybe a little lol) but just to show it off in general. If I just bought a 1 Million Dollar house, I'd post some pictures of it in the general discussion fourm, I'll tell you that :) Either way, I must say I am very disappointed at the direction this board is heading. I've been a member here for almost 2 years, and have never seen the board come to "this new low". As for this mystical watch, I agree with the others, and will leave it at that.

28 December 2009, 02:31 PM	#217
deserted Banned Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: fort wayne IN Watch: Patek 1909003 Posts: 2,176	OMG that's it , good night all! i'm too through with this thread this truly is the funniest night i've had in a long time, you know dude you make me laugh.......

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)