ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 February 2007, 06:36 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Greece
Watch: SS GMT II
Posts: 58
|
Jubilee vs Oyster bracelet
Was wondering which one is the strongest..
I assume it should be the oyster - thicker pins/screws, less links, stretches less in long periods of usage etc. - but i am really not sure. what are the main construction differences? tks for enlightening me. Last edited by eudiam; 13 February 2007 at 12:22 AM.. |
12 February 2007, 07:22 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Richard
Location: LV, NV
Watch: LV Sub and others
Posts: 2,689
|
Eudiam,
In 1989 I had my first Rolex; the watch had a Jubilee bracelet after several years of solid use I had to replace it because it was thrashed. I have had better luck with the Oyster bracelets, so I prefer them to the Jubilee. I know some of my friends have also had problems with their Jubilee bracelets. Rolex has improved their bracelets over the years and I am happy with the bracelets of today versus the bracelets of the 1980’s. I am sure other members of this forum will have better facts as to which are better, I feel it is just a matter of what you prefer. |
12 February 2007, 08:16 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,258
|
Myself prefer the Oyster bracelet,but the newer Jubilee looks like a big improvement on the older style.But even the Oyster today is only a solid S.Steel copy of the original Rolex oyster bracelet stretch link bracelet.Both bracelets are very strong and perfectly strong enough for what they was designed for.Now sometimes the jubilee does stretch but never heard of one breaking unless abused.And all bracelets,straps etc on all watches. Are only as strong as the weakest link and thats normally the lug pins or adjustment locating pins.And both bracelets have been around for decades now with very little change.And I am sure if any of the Rolex bracelets had any problem strength wise it would have rectified quick.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
12 February 2007, 09:13 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: George
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: GMT II 16710 Coke
Posts: 1,046
|
I donīt know which is stronger - though I think it is the Oyster - but I sure like it more over the Jubilee ....
|
12 February 2007, 10:31 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Tony
Location: san francisco
Watch: Seadweller
Posts: 1,367
|
The Oyster is stronger for many of the reasons you wrote... The jubilee is maybe more comfortable, but in it's older configuration it was meant for the lighter weight watch bodies.
More moving parts = more areas to wear out.
__________________
It's a rarity that something popular is actually right... Wear 'em with PRIDE, y'all. |
13 February 2007, 12:05 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Ken
Location: New York
Watch: 116234 DateJust
Posts: 1,769
|
The new jubilee are solid links, so they are different than the traditional jubilee that people comment about.
__________________
My Rolex reference books collection: The Rolex Report: An Unauthorized Reference Book For The Rolex Enthusiast Rolex Wristwatches: An Unauthorized History (Schiffer Book for Collectors) (Hardcover) Vintage Rolex Sports Models: A Complete Visual Reference & Unauthorized History (Hardcover) |
13 February 2007, 12:27 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Greece
Watch: SS GMT II
Posts: 58
|
agree, but doesn't the fact that it has more links and hence pins/screws matter? not really sure abt the thickness of the pins also..
|
13 February 2007, 12:45 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rhodes, Greece
Posts: 85
|
Surely the Oyster, it is made to be strong and not for being nice like the jubilee is.
|
13 February 2007, 01:58 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Alex
Location: USA
Watch: TT Blue Sub
Posts: 2,542
|
In my opinion the oyster will retain the stiffness of the links longer.
|
13 February 2007, 03:24 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: S F Bay Area
Posts: 621
|
I view this as a 'now many angels on the head of a pin?' kind of question. Oyster or Jubilee? Which is stronger? Heck, this is Rolex! Make your decision based on your own personal preference, no some hypothetical question of longevity or strength. Jubilee bracelets have been on Rolex watches for decades. Yes, after 10 or 15 years, the Jubilee is more prone to stretching, but that's only under severe useage. And an Oyster will also stretch if abused.
Are you going to place a hook inside the bracelet and hang from a tree branch? Are you going to take off your bracelet and drive nails with it? Are your going to grip the closed bracelet and perform isometric exercises with it? Are you going to test its strength by using it as a set of brass knuckles in a bar fight? If you're just going to purchase a Rolex and wear it then I don't think you need be worried about the relative strength issues between Oyster and Jubilee. I've seen examples of both in excellent condition after 20+ years of service, and I've seen others in need of replacement after 10 years of abuse. Pick your Rolex, pick your bracelet, wear your Rolex, celebrate your acquisition here, let us validate your choice here and smile. Life's far too short to obsess over the hypothetical failings of anything Rolex. Just my 2 cents. |
13 February 2007, 04:10 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Ken
Location: New York
Watch: 116234 DateJust
Posts: 1,769
|
You just gave me an idea.
__________________
My Rolex reference books collection: The Rolex Report: An Unauthorized Reference Book For The Rolex Enthusiast Rolex Wristwatches: An Unauthorized History (Schiffer Book for Collectors) (Hardcover) Vintage Rolex Sports Models: A Complete Visual Reference & Unauthorized History (Hardcover) |
13 February 2007, 04:15 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,063
|
As for me I just prefer how the oyster looks compared to the jubilee... I cant imagine a Sub or Daytona with a jubilee
|
13 February 2007, 04:25 AM | #13 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
Oyster = Sporty!!
Jubilee = Dressy!!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
13 February 2007, 04:58 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: Oysterdate 6694
Posts: 2,713
|
I disagree with the integrity of the oyster. I have seen rivet oyster bands thrashed. I have also seen terribly damaged President bands. The oval link jubilee is only broken due to abuse. I have seen newer bands and the oval links thrashed. Maybe people gained weight and purposely streched the links who knows. I admit on this forum that I have go to a Nato because I am gaining too much weight and sold my prized Jubilee bands because of the weight increase.
|
13 February 2007, 05:03 AM | #15 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
Quote:
I used to weigh in at 207 lbs. 18 months ago. I now weigh around 190. The 17 pound loss has made absolutely NO DIFFERENCE to my bracelet setting on any of my watches. Still fit on the same setting. JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
13 February 2007, 06:11 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Greece
Watch: SS GMT II
Posts: 58
|
Quote:
Well, it is not a matter of wanting to know whether someone could use his rolex bracelet for purposes other than what it was designed to do ie. hold ur watch onto ur wrist..it's just having an idea which one is the strongest for the sake of it. it is the same as going for a sd instead of a sub, being fascinated with the idea it can withstand pressure 4,000 ft under water as opposed to 1,220 ft, smthng that realistically speaking doesn't make a difference to nobody.. anyway most of the 15+ year old jubilee bracelets i've seen are not as tight as the respective oyster ones and was wondering whether this has anything to do with the way they are made or if its just pure coincidence. as far as the looks are concerned, have to agree with jj that the oyster looks to me more sporty than jubilee. |
|
13 February 2007, 06:25 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Florida
Watch: PAM 1090
Posts: 3,723
|
Not necessarily. My body can retain quite a bit of water. A 10 pound weight loss requires a pin adjustment on my clasp. I should know, I just lost 10 pounds!
__________________
Member #471 |
13 February 2007, 07:42 AM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
|
__________________
Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution! |
13 February 2007, 08:55 AM | #19 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
And President = Presentable!!
PS: No relation whatsoever with our "President"!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
13 February 2007, 11:31 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: Oysterdate 6694
Posts: 2,713
|
JJ, I can't hardly fit in my car. Its kinda difficult to discuss weight gain and whether wrist get big or not. When I first got my USA Jubilee I was able to fit the one with 21 links. The 20 link was sold first. What did you do to lose those 17 pounds?
|
13 February 2007, 12:39 PM | #21 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
Quote:
The great thing about this method is once you lose the weight, you can start eating any thing you like, but in moderation of course. JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
14 February 2007, 12:01 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Robert
Location: Angelus Oaks, CA
Watch: 116713
Posts: 6,828
|
I have lost a lot of weight since saving my lunch money for Rolexes!
|
14 February 2007, 01:19 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: Oysterdate 6694
Posts: 2,713
|
I have the worst eating habits you could imagine. I go to Dunkin Donuts and eat half a dozen then guzzle down a chocolate milk along with a large cream/sugar coffee. I tell close family I did not gain weight by eating bologna sandwiches. I have had the best foods in high and low end restaurants. I never look in the mirror.
|
14 February 2007, 01:44 AM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: All with a crown.
Posts: 504
|
Quote:
PAtrick
__________________
"I wouldn't be part of any club that would have me as a member." Instagram: El_Diablo_Rosso |
|
14 February 2007, 01:51 AM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Robert
Location: Angelus Oaks, CA
Watch: 116713
Posts: 6,828
|
Quote:
|
|
14 February 2007, 04:16 AM | #26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington, USA
Watch: Rolex Sea-dweller
Posts: 207
|
Quote:
It is really hard to compare the structural strength of the two I think. I personally like the Oyster much more. |
|
14 February 2007, 06:05 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Greece
Watch: SS GMT II
Posts: 58
|
[QUOTE=quinson418;177926]Maybe the initial thought was just to look into the bracelets a little bit more.
Yes, as explained in a previous post, this was the initial thought. |
14 February 2007, 06:06 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Greece
Watch: SS GMT II
Posts: 58
|
[QUOTE=quinson418;177926]Maybe the initial thought was just to look into the bracelets a little bit more.
Yes, as explained in a previous post, this was the initial thought. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.