The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10 January 2019, 06:57 PM   #1
Mansell92
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 64
Rolex Submariner 1680 Full set, thoughts?

Hi, what are your thoughts on this piece currently on offer? I have some concerns regarding the dial and hands.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg s-l1600.jpg (110.7 KB, 795 views)
File Type: jpg s-l1600 (7).jpg (77.8 KB, 786 views)
File Type: jpg s-l1600 (8).jpg (87.7 KB, 788 views)
File Type: jpg s-l1600 (6).jpg (113.3 KB, 791 views)
File Type: jpg s-l1600 (1).jpg (69.6 KB, 783 views)
Mansell92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2019, 07:07 PM   #2
btinl
2024 Pledge Member
 
btinl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: .
Watch: on my wrist
Posts: 1,942
Dial looks fake. Insert is AM. Avoid.
btinl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2019, 07:25 PM   #3
Mansell92
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 64
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/VINTAGE-...59.m2763.l2649
Mansell92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2019, 07:29 PM   #4
Mansell92
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 64
Thanks, yes I had somes doubts as soon as I looked at it.
Mansell92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2019, 09:32 PM   #5
TimeToGo
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,586
.
This belongs in the Watchout section..
TimeToGo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2019, 09:34 PM   #6
Mansell92
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 64
So its definitely a fake dial and hands? The seller is very adamant they are both authentic.
Mansell92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 January 2019, 12:13 AM   #7
Kingface66
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kingface66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: 1966 Rolex 5513
Posts: 3,414
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mansell92 View Post
So its definitely a fake dial and hands? The seller is very adamant they are both authentic.
The dial is fake. If he’s adamant it’s not it’s either because he doesn’t know anything about red 1680 dial variants, or he does know and his hoping to fool some sucker.
Kingface66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 January 2019, 12:27 AM   #8
gasparantonio
"TRF" Member
 
gasparantonio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: United States
Watch: SD43/17, 1680/71
Posts: 15
The serial number doesn’t match since it must be a case for meters first according to my experience with this watch and the many watches I have seen and the most accurate information is on the web where you can find it.

The dial is also very strange and the fonts I don’t see them also very clear to confirm, can you please send more photos moving the hands so I can see the crown and the alignment of the letter L With the crown.

And the last thing is that the patina also doesn’t match the white hands, so this is also a Point to take into account on the price.

Finally, how much are they asking for this piece so I can give you MHO.

BR
gasparantonio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 January 2019, 01:12 AM   #9
J!m
"TRF" Member
 
J!m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Jim
Location: Connecticut
Watch: this! Hold my beer
Posts: 2,813
Interesting to note it still has a 700 crown but clearly has been polished based on the upper crown guard condition, and also wears a 93150 bracelet.

So, it was serviced at some point, and got a heavy polish and new bracelet, but the old 700 was put back on? No. I don't think so. It had a 703 most likely and a 700 crown and tube were installed. Not even a nice 700 crown...

Does the serial on the punched papers match the case serial?

It might be a decent collection of parts, but not a correct watch, and therefore, not worth the top dollar the seller is undoubtedly asking for it. Also back side of case, to examine any corrosion and bracelet wear.

A photo of the movement serial and inside the case back would help to determine if they are authentic/age appropriate.

I'd pay no more than five grand if I could verify the parts I suspect are genuine, to actually be genuine. Maybe a couple hundred more for the papers, assuming the numbers all match. If the seller is asking any more than that (and especially if you can't do most of your own work on it) just find another one.
J!m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 January 2019, 01:24 AM   #10
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by gasparantonio View Post
The serial number doesn’t match since it must be a case for meters first according to my experience with this watch and the many watches I have seen and the most accurate information is on the web where you can find it.

The dial is also very strange and the fonts I don’t see them also very clear to confirm, can you please send more photos moving the hands so I can see the crown and the alignment of the letter L With the crown.

And the last thing is that the patina also doesn’t match the white hands, so this is also a Point to take into account on the price.

Finally, how much are they asking for this piece so I can give you MHO.

BR
Not that it really matters, because that dial is bad, but the 2.5 million cases were at the beginning of the feet-first red 1680 dials, so that part could be OK. The rest .... not so much.
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 January 2019, 01:49 AM   #11
Kingface66
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kingface66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: 1966 Rolex 5513
Posts: 3,414
Quote:
Originally Posted by gasparantonio View Post
The dial is also very strange and the fonts I don’t see them also very clear to confirm, can you please send more photos moving the hands so I can see the crown and the alignment of the letter L With the crown.
There's no reason to further check the alignment. Just look at the word SUBMARINER and how skewed to the right it is. All the printing is wrong. Compare it to any of the three feet-first variants.







Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Kingface66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 January 2019, 06:17 AM   #12
Swearengen
"TRF" Member
 
Swearengen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,816
+1 Submariner alignment is the key tell for me. What little I can see of the L in Rolex looks too far to the left.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingface66 View Post
There's no reason to further check the alignment. Just look at the word SUBMARINER and how skewed to the right it is. All the printing is wrong. Compare it to any of the three feet-first variants.







Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________

1680 1675 16800 16570 16710 17000 16613 17013

Gone but not forgotten 16610LV 1016
16234
Swearengen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 January 2019, 08:49 AM   #13
edtheaussie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
What's the value impact of the dial not being original? - or I guess what does a red sub dial go for these days?
edtheaussie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 January 2019, 09:18 AM   #14
southtexas
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
southtexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Great State of TX
Posts: 5,683
Rolex Submariner 1680 Full set, thoughts?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingface66 View Post
There's no reason to further check the alignment. Just look at the word SUBMARINER and how skewed to the right it is. All the printing is wrong. Compare it to any of the three feet-first variants.







Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yep, it looks like the word Submariner agrees the dial is hideous and is attempting to run away.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Forty six & 2 are just ahead of me.

Follow me on Instagram @ccrolex
southtexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 January 2019, 09:29 AM   #15
Mansell92
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by southtexas View Post
Yep, it looks like the word Submariner agrees the dial is hideous and is attempting to run away.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
lol, yes it looked off and terribly faint also.

The seller was asking $32,000AUD, so $23,000USD
Mansell92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 January 2019, 09:30 AM   #16
southtexas
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
southtexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Great State of TX
Posts: 5,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mansell92 View Post
lol, yes it looked off and terribly faint also.



The seller was asking $32,000AUD, so $23,000USD


I saw the listing was pulled. Maybe he finally realized dial was off, or someone reported him and got it pulled.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Forty six & 2 are just ahead of me.

Follow me on Instagram @ccrolex
southtexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 January 2019, 08:19 PM   #17
Mansell92
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 64
Some more photos
Attached Images
File Type: jpg s-l1600 (3).jpg (138.3 KB, 598 views)
File Type: jpg s-l1600 (4).jpg (119.0 KB, 594 views)
File Type: jpg s-l1600 (5).jpg (77.3 KB, 587 views)
File Type: jpg s-l1600 (11).jpg (113.8 KB, 591 views)
File Type: jpg s-l1600 (2).jpg (68.5 KB, 582 views)
Mansell92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2019, 12:27 AM   #18
Kingface66
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kingface66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: 1966 Rolex 5513
Posts: 3,414
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mansell92 View Post
Some more photos
How did you get these additional photos after the listing was pulled? And you do understand that the dial is not authentic, yes?
Kingface66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2019, 09:41 AM   #19
Mansell92
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 64
Yes, a few of us noticed it and told him. This was an easy one to be honest, just the wonky font and off centre Submariner gave it away. During those discussions he sent me more photos as he was sure it was legit.
Mansell92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2019, 11:04 AM   #20
Kingface66
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kingface66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: 1966 Rolex 5513
Posts: 3,414
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mansell92 View Post
Yes, a few of us noticed it and told him. This was an easy one to be honest, just the wonky font and off centre Submariner gave it away. During those discussions he sent me more photos as he was sure it was legit.
Yeah, I understand that (I was the one who posted the pics of the correct dial variations) but after it was established as a fake dial (and a pulled auction) I wasn’t understanding why you’d bother posting more pictures
Kingface66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2019, 01:05 PM   #21
Mr_A_Love_Rolex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 14
Any idea of value as is ?
Mr_A_Love_Rolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2019, 01:33 PM   #22
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_A_Love_Rolex View Post
Any idea of value as is ?
The entire package appears to be put-together and so it is neither original or authentic as a Red-Sub.

The cost to put this watch "right" would be exorbitant; this is a classic Frankenwatch; something put together to appear as something it is/was not.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2019, 05:29 PM   #23
Fredrik
2024 Pledge Member
 
Fredrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sweden
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,825
The newer band with Seadweller end links also suggests that this probably started as just a case and nothing else.
Fredrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2019, 08:21 PM   #24
Dangur
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: IL
Posts: 52
Doing a mishmash of fake and original parts, whats the point?!
Dangur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 01:43 AM   #25
cajuntiger
"TRF" Member
 
cajuntiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Who Dat
Location: USA
Watch: 5512
Posts: 1,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by edtheaussie View Post
What's the value impact of the dial not being original? - or I guess what does a red sub dial go for these days?
Its a huge red flag...imo it means do not even ask these questions.
The dial is the watch, the impact is significant and it only draws attention to many other issues with this watch. So why bother even considering this question?

My .02- if you cant tell the difference DO NOT BUY ON EBAY. If you have a hard time understanding the nuances of these pieces you are far better off long term buying from a reputable dealer and paying more for a solid example.
__________________

@heuerautavia
cajuntiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2019, 10:13 AM   #26
Mansell92
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by cajuntiger View Post
Its a huge red flag...imo it means do not even ask these questions.
The dial is the watch, the impact is significant and it only draws attention to many other issues with this watch. So why bother even considering this question?

My .02- if you cant tell the difference DO NOT BUY ON EBAY. If you have a hard time understanding the nuances of these pieces you are far better off long term buying from a reputable dealer and paying more for a solid example.


I knew it was a fake dial as soon as I saw it. The seller didnt believe me. So I created this thread and forwarded him the link and told him to check it in a few hours.

He took the watch down pretty quickly after having my initial observations validated.
Mansell92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2019, 07:12 AM   #27
Mansell92
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_A_Love_Rolex View Post
Any idea of value as is ?
This is actually the owner of the watch. My mate told me he is chucking a white dial in it now which is confirmed by this post:

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=651369

I guess we will wait watch and see what face this Frankenstein watch has in the coming weeks.
Mansell92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2019, 05:05 PM   #28
Mr_A_Love_Rolex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 14
People that know me are very well aware I am no scammer. The watch I pulled down with an hour! As your title says Red Sub 1680 Full set, it will soon be. All period correct and 100% genuine. I have the number one expert in Australia helping me... I made a mistake sure I won't go into details. But so did you, you made me several offers on eBay for this watch when it had a fake dial. So much for someone that claims that it was so obvious and the font was so off!
Mr_A_Love_Rolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2019, 01:32 PM   #29
Mansell92
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 64
My offers were 10k under your asking price as I took into account the fake dial
Mansell92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2019, 01:38 PM   #30
1665fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,590
Lol hilarious, when you get the new red dial show us pics lol
1665fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.