ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 October 2018, 10:39 AM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Clive
Location: The Alps
Watch: collections change
Posts: 6,269
|
Tudor GMT....astounding accuracy
It’s gained 0.2 seconds in two weeks. I’ve never known a watch like it.
__________________
. The path from WIShood to WISdom can have many turnings... ——————————————————————————————————— . 16803. 16570. 18038. 114300. BB58. GMW-B5000D. |
11 October 2018, 10:41 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: James
Location: Wimbledon, London
Posts: 451
|
Nice Unicorn!
Hopefully you don't get the date issue! |
11 October 2018, 10:45 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Chuck
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex 116610LV
Posts: 2,122
|
Wow!! That's amazing indeed! Tudor can start putting "Superlative Chronometer" on their watch dials too. Very impressive. Cheers!
|
11 October 2018, 10:52 AM | #4 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 71,824
|
Fantastic!
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
11 October 2018, 10:53 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Calgary, AB, CAN
Posts: 794
|
Amazing. I don't have an app, but mine has similar remarkable accuracy. I set this about ten weeks ago when I picked it up at the AD and is gained 8 seconds since then. Mindblowing. No problems with the date either....pretty much a perfect watch.
__________________
JP |
11 October 2018, 10:56 AM | #6 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Texas
Watch: @Escapementt
Posts: 9,842
|
I am having the same results on mine; it is truly a great piece and such a great value IMHO. Tudor really hit it out of the park with this one.
|
11 October 2018, 11:00 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
|
Wow that’s amazing
|
11 October 2018, 11:19 AM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Parth
Location: Los Angeles & SD
Watch: 16613LB
Posts: 577
|
Mine is a Pelagos, still in Tudor family and still same base movement. It loses about 3 seconds a day, is that considered normal as well?
|
11 October 2018, 11:55 AM | #9 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Grant
Location: U.S.
Watch: GMT 1675 PCG Gilt
Posts: 5,716
|
Good gravy!!! I’ve never experienced anything like it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Just another WIS who loves to trade... |
11 October 2018, 11:58 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Missouri
Posts: 52
|
I haven’t kept a log, but my Tudor GMT is generally +1/-1 per day. The worst it’s ever been is -1.5 seconds, and that only happened once.
I wish the bracelet had more adjustments, but otherwise it’s perfect for those who like a hefty watch. |
11 October 2018, 12:05 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: London
Posts: 4,452
|
Excellent performance. Really a pivotal piece in the Tudor line.
__________________
@watchtheleftwrist |
11 October 2018, 12:09 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cambridge, NY
Posts: 1,089
|
That’s very encouraging; mine is basically spot on since I purchased it last Friday. I’ll be curious to see if it maintains that accuracy!
|
11 October 2018, 12:57 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Texas/Virginia
Posts: 292
|
What’s the date issue?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
11 October 2018, 01:25 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Matt
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: The Next One
Posts: 50
|
That appl looks pretty cool, I was wondering what it’s called and what your thoughts on it are.
Thanks in advance Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
11 October 2018, 03:56 PM | #15 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Danny
Location: Bay Area CA
Watch: Yellow Gold
Posts: 20,161
|
Good stuff
|
11 October 2018, 04:01 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 374
|
|
11 October 2018, 04:42 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Uk
Posts: 60
|
I don’t think we can get too excited about the actual accuracy of individual watches reported here. The quality of a movement is in consistency with time and average accuracy over a large sample of watches (i.e. is there a wide or a narrow distribution). Even the junkiest movement will have some examples that are bang on.
|
11 October 2018, 04:50 PM | #18 | ||
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Clive
Location: The Alps
Watch: collections change
Posts: 6,269
|
I’ve had the watch for 10 weeks now, and the date is working fine.
Quote:
Quote:
Twixt. It’s very good.
__________________
. The path from WIShood to WISdom can have many turnings... ——————————————————————————————————— . 16803. 16570. 18038. 114300. BB58. GMW-B5000D. |
||
11 October 2018, 10:54 PM | #19 |
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Tampa
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 2,674
|
So happy to hear you didn't have the date issue.
I should be getting a call from the ad any day now. And I confirm impeccable accuracy. Better than any of my Rolex.
__________________
Sea-Dweller 116600 - the manly one GMT II 16710 - the manly one Daytona 116500 - the manly-womanly one Yacht-Master 268622 - the chick version Speedy Mitsukoshi <3 Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAF141C.BA0824 - the chick version Thank you logan5tx!!! Have to link it. Too long for the signature. https://www.rolexforums.com/showpost...0&postcount=14 |
11 October 2018, 11:28 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,477
|
That is amazing...but then again, my experience with the Tudor in house movements has been nothing short of spectacular.
|
11 October 2018, 11:31 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,229
|
Good accuracy but how accurate are any of these phone apps when compared to a proper timegraph.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
11 October 2018, 11:49 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: T
Location: AZ, NV, CA
Posts: 6,481
|
Very nice!
|
12 October 2018, 12:53 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cambridge, NY
Posts: 1,089
|
Allegedly my iPhone clock is accurate to within 50 milliseconds. My GMT has been exactly in sync with my phone and iPad and that’s close enough for me. Obviously a timegrapher (cheap models are around $150) is much more accurate and readings are immediate rather than visually checking over a period of days or even weeks. My AD will happily put any of my watches on a timegrapher if I want but I really think a quick occasional check against my phone is good enough
|
12 October 2018, 03:31 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 3
|
That is truly incredible. That's better than spring drive accuracy!
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk |
12 October 2018, 01:14 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Florida
Posts: 97
|
Awesome
|
13 October 2018, 01:08 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: jay
Location: North London
Watch: BBG,Hulk,16013,DJB
Posts: 3,278
|
Big thumbs up from me,
Worn constantly since collected in early June and only taken off at bedtime and not even needed winding and probably the most accurate piece I have owned,, Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
13 October 2018, 02:41 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,634
|
Not bad at all !!
__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.” ― Winston S. Churchill |
13 October 2018, 05:03 AM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,405
|
nice watch
|
13 October 2018, 05:32 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: US
Posts: 384
|
Mine has been insanely accurate as well. At first, I thought the watch was McDonalds because.....
I'm lovin' it Ok, ill stop. |
13 October 2018, 05:38 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,456
|
Same with my 58. Not as good, but gains maybe .5 seconds a day!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.