ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 March 2021, 06:40 AM | #31 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: NJ
Watch: 5513 116234 79280P
Posts: 2,144
|
Quote:
I had my precious 5513 serviced by my local guy and would trust no one else. Included in his Rolex service are genuine mainspring and reversing wheels replacement. Mine needed balance work too and a service crown. No polishing. Came back running like new with 2 year warranty.
__________________
The wristwatch is an intimate accessory. The best watches live in harmony and interact with the wearer, and their functions offer a reassuring and emotionally satisfying bond - Kintaro Hattori |
|
3 August 2021, 04:00 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 75
|
I finally had time to drop the 16520 off at RSC Beverly Hills. They agreed to do a complete overhaul of the movement with no refinishing the case or bracelet.
However, they state it's necessary for the crown to be replaced with a 704. I believe my original crown is a 703? Of course I'd prefer to keep everything as original as possible, but I also appreciate having a RSC warranty card. |
3 August 2021, 06:34 AM | #33 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: USA
Watch: 5 digit models
Posts: 1,515
|
They should do a great job. RSC Dallas did my A-serial 16520 in Feb to March 2020. Great job. No polish. Didn’t need the crown replaced but did ask for a new bezel (my original was returned) and the crystal (chip).
Quote:
|
|
3 August 2021, 06:55 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,035
|
If you are opting to not have watch polished, I recommend you bring in watch head only for service. This will increase your odds, along with a written message, that they don’t polish.
__________________
|
3 August 2021, 07:23 AM | #35 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,896
|
Quote:
Did they state “required” or “recommended”. Big difference. If only recommended, I’d keep it original. Just my Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
|
3 August 2021, 08:16 PM | #36 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 1,861
|
Send your watch to Phillips, as is, and have them sell it for you. With the proceeds buy yourself a NIB Daytona 116500 in the grey market and you should still have some money left over.
Having Rolex service your watch is a roll of the dice. If they "accidentally" polish your watch you will be out $15-20K and they will apologize and offer you a free service next time your watch needs it. Unless vintage Rolexes are your thing, in which case you wouldn't have had to ask how to have yours serviced, owning an untouched watch like yours entails more risk than reward. |
3 August 2021, 09:00 PM | #37 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,615
|
Quote:
Some terrible advice….. so if someone ask a ? About a classic car the answer is to sell and get a new one????? What a joke |
|
4 August 2021, 12:21 AM | #38 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 1,861
|
Quote:
Personally, with a watch of this value I would only send it to one of the skilled professionals who deal with watches of this caliber not a factory like RSC. Given the difficulties of dealing with the ownership of vintage Rolexes, perhaps the OP would prefer to own a beautiful new Daytona which won't present the issues which a vintage Daytona does. I don't see the harm in making the OP aware of the option. Last edited by cascavel; 4 August 2021 at 12:23 AM.. Reason: spelling, again. |
|
4 August 2021, 03:44 AM | #39 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,121
|
Quote:
The usual problem, when there is one, is that we send our watches through an AD, who is then the "customer" that Rolex deals with, and any decision about parts is out of our hands.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
4 August 2021, 04:13 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 75
|
I called the RSC and they agreed to return the original crown to me for an extra charge of $18.40.
As I'll have the original crown still, I think that I will proceed with the servicing. I looked into other recommended watchmakers and many stated that they were not sure if they could complete the service as parts for the 4030 movement were no longer available from Rolex. Cost of service was about the same as RSC. Thank you all for your feedback, much appreciated! |
4 August 2021, 07:01 AM | #41 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,818
|
Quote:
|
|
4 August 2021, 07:19 AM | #42 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,615
|
Quote:
|
|
4 August 2021, 07:23 AM | #43 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,818
|
|
4 August 2021, 08:39 AM | #44 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: USA
Watch: 5 digit models
Posts: 1,515
|
Service for Daytona 16520 CW21 vs RSC
for the folks wondering about 404 vs. 403 crowns. Updated pic from when I posted earlier
|
4 August 2021, 08:43 AM | #45 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 75
|
Quote:
Your's is a U serial with a 704 crown. So the change likely occurred around 1997? |
|
4 August 2021, 08:49 AM | #46 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,818
|
|
4 August 2021, 08:51 AM | #47 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: USA
Watch: 5 digit models
Posts: 1,515
|
|
4 August 2021, 08:51 AM | #48 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,818
|
|
4 August 2021, 09:58 AM | #49 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,517
|
Quote:
p.s your observation above is correct. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.