The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex Watch Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 February 2008, 04:52 PM   #1
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
John Holbrook's Day-Date Review

Enjoy reading it guys/gals rolexreferencepage.com/Daydate/review.html
__________________



GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2008, 04:57 PM   #2
badsmac
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Mansfield,TX
Watch: Rolex SS Sub
Posts: 480
It's a great review. I looked at that very watch at an AD yesterday. Very heavy. I'd say heavier than an SD. Too small for my 8" wrist though.
Thanks for posting, Frostie.
badsmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2008, 05:00 PM   #3
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by badsmac View Post
It's a great review. I looked at that very watch at an AD yesterday. Very heavy. I'd say heavier than an SD. Too small for my 8" wrist though.
Thanks for posting, Frostie.
Glad that you liked the review

I've never seen that watch from close. Do you think that this watch would look small on a 7 1/2 " wrist?
__________________



GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2008, 05:10 PM   #4
badsmac
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Mansfield,TX
Watch: Rolex SS Sub
Posts: 480
Maybe a little small. from looking at your avatar with your wrist it would probably look ok. And it was only $22,500. Lunch money right? Way too rich for me.
badsmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2008, 05:13 PM   #5
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by badsmac View Post
Maybe a little small. from looking at your avatar with your wrist it would probably look ok. And it was only $22,500. Lunch money right? Way too rich for me.
You know the funny thing is that 22,500$ are 15,192 euros and that's the list price in the US. The list price for that specific watch here in greece is 22,500 euros (33,323$) which is quite scary
__________________



GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2008, 05:44 PM   #6
Atomant
"TRF" Member
 
Atomant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
Velitsko, my wrist is 7" and the watch looks too small for my wrist.
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80
Atomant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2008, 05:47 PM   #7
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
So i guess someone should have a wrist smaller than 7"

I think that rolex should start producing a 40mm DD.
__________________



GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2008, 05:50 PM   #8
scottschoe
"TRF" Member
 
scottschoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 3,295
On my 7.5-8" wrist, the watch seems a bit smaller than what I'm used to, but it's super heavy and a decent size for a dress watch.
__________________
__________________
scottschoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2008, 05:51 PM   #9
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottschoe View Post
On my 7.5-8" wrist, the watch seems a bit smaller than what I'm used to, but it's super heavy and a decent size for a dress watch.
I've never tried one so that's why i am so confused. I have to try one.

The thing is that i got used to the big Ceramic bezel with the huge numbers and any other rolex watch looks small to me
__________________



GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2008, 05:57 PM   #10
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by frostie View Post
Strange that I haven't seen that review before. I often visit John's site. Is it a fairly new review?

Anyway, very nice review! And thanks for sharing!

I looked in vain for the information that the current Day-Dates are the ONLY Rolex watches made with a slightly DOMED sapphire crystal, though. And IMHO he could also have mentioned that the bracelet got updated in year 2000, resulting in SOLID centre links (in fact, the centre links on the predecessor DD's did not have solid centre links. They were hollow inside, but looked solid from the outside).

As a sidenote, the new clasp did not come together with the other updates in 2000. It came with the K series (possibly late P-series).

See about the Basel 2000 news here.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2008, 05:59 PM   #11
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
Thanks a lot for the info and the link Bo

__________________



GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2008, 07:31 PM   #12
topcat30093
"TRF" Member
 
topcat30093's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,425
[QUOTE=SPACE-DWELLER;470266]Strange that I haven't seen that review before. I often visit John's site. Is it a fairly new review?
Hi Bo
In answer to the above, its been on John's page for about 2 - 3 weeks.
I don't know how you do it, but you always amaze me by coming up with all these different links, you certainly have a great wealth of knowledge.

topcat30093 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2008, 08:32 PM   #13
Alcan
2024 Pledge Member
 
Alcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
My AD has had a pre-owned YG DD in the display case for a while now. For $17,000 it'll probably be there for a while.
__________________
Member #1,315

I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution!
Alcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2008, 11:29 PM   #14
Triple Black 88
"TRF" Member
 
Triple Black 88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Steve
Location: Collegeville PA
Watch: Day-Date
Posts: 752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alcan View Post
My AD has had a pre-owned YG DD in the display case for a while now. For $17,000 it'll probably be there for a while.
That's a little high for being "pre-owned"!
Triple Black 88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2008, 11:37 PM   #15
Rolex_07
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 369
Is the entire watch 18k gold?
Rolex_07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2008, 11:44 PM   #16
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolex_07 View Post
Is the entire watch 18k gold?
White gold
__________________



GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2008, 11:44 PM   #17
Triple Black 88
"TRF" Member
 
Triple Black 88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Steve
Location: Collegeville PA
Watch: Day-Date
Posts: 752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atomant View Post
Velitsko, my wrist is 7" and the watch looks too small for my wrist.
I see this size issue all the time. I find very hard to believe that the DD looks "small" on a 7" wrist. My wrist is 7 1/2" exactly. I'm 6' 1", 210lb and trust me, it does not look small. It looks exactly the same on me as it does on the guy in the tutorial. You may be used to a larger size and prefer the larger size, but it does not "look" out of place on an average size guy in the 6'...7 1/2" wrist range.
[IMG][/IMG]
Triple Black 88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2008, 11:47 PM   #18
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triple Black 88 View Post
I see this size issue all the time. I find very hard to believe that the DD looks "small" on a 7" wrist. My wrist is 7 1/2" exactly. I'm 6' 1", 210lb and trust me, it does not look small. It looks exactly the same on me as it does on the guy in the tutorial. You may be used to a larger size and prefer the larger size, but it does not "look" out of place on an average size guy in the 6'...7 1/2" wrist range.
[IMG][/IMG]
Thanks a lot for the info. If the DD would look good on my wrist it would be my grail watch cause at this moment it's unaffordable for me. I guess i have to visit an AD and try one
__________________



GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2008, 11:48 PM   #19
Ed Rooney
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
I think that looks great in WG.
Ed Rooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2008, 11:58 PM   #20
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
I have always loved the DD model, especially the 118238 (YG, fluted bezel).

I tried one on at an AD some months ago. I have a 7 ½ and IMHO the DD does not look small on my wrist:




__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2008, 12:10 AM   #21
DJF881
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 248
My father owned a DD. I would probably not wear a watch like that. You may remember that I sort of scoff at people lamenting the blinginess of gloss dials and WG hands and polished center links, but a gold watch on a solid gold bracelet is too much for me.

If I were going for a high end dress watch, I would get a Patek Calatrava.
DJF881 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2008, 12:12 AM   #22
Triple Black 88
"TRF" Member
 
Triple Black 88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Steve
Location: Collegeville PA
Watch: Day-Date
Posts: 752
Bo, do you typically wear your watches above your wrist bone (elbow side) as it looks in your pics or below the bone similar to guy in the tutorial? IMO...the smaller watched (DD/DJ) look better below the wrist bone or on it...NOT above it.
Triple Black 88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2008, 12:32 AM   #23
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
I _always_ wear my watches ABOVE the wristbone:

Watch > wristbone > hand

I hate when the watch is obstructing my hand movements and the crown is touching the overside of my hand.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2008, 12:46 AM   #24
Triple Black 88
"TRF" Member
 
Triple Black 88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Steve
Location: Collegeville PA
Watch: Day-Date
Posts: 752
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER View Post
I _always_ wear my watches ABOVE the wristbone:

Watch > wristbone > hand

I hate when the watch is obstructing my hand movements and the crown is touching the overside of my hand.
I wear mine like the guy in the tutorial...wristbone>Watch>hand. I have more space between wristbone & hand then the guy in the pic. Enough that the crown doesn't dig into my hand when I bend my wrist up.

I think that why I don't like the sport models as much. When I wear it below the wristbone (which is where I find it most comfortable) the crown constantly diggs into my hand, similar to how the WG DD does in the tutorial pic.
Triple Black 88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2008, 02:30 AM   #25
kcmo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
I actually found this review about a week ago and was glad to see John had added it to his site! Lovely watch indeed! Ahhhh, gotta love that rhodium!
kcmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2008, 02:41 AM   #26
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
Holbrook writes well and his camera work is up there with some of the best!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2008, 02:42 AM   #27
mikey
"TRF" Member
 
mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: Oysterdate 6694
Posts: 2,713
By todays watch standards the DD and any 36mm is small.
mikey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2008, 02:47 AM   #28
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
Actullay holbrook is preparing a macro photography book for dummies

I 'll have to buy it
__________________



GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2008, 04:07 AM   #29
Arby
"TRF" Member
 
Arby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Ron
Location: NJ
Posts: 726
I just measured my wrist and it's 7 1/2". My 118239 fits perfectly.
Arby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2008, 12:33 PM   #30
buz-lh
"TRF" Member
 
buz-lh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Buz
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Rolex Tudor Pam
Posts: 5,108
A stunner in WG. I tried on the platinum with ice blue dial and man is that a heavy watch. Beautiful and solid. $40,000 +. I think if you could get the white gold with the ice blue dial and Romans that would be the bomb.
__________________
Buz
The faster you move, the slower time passes, the longer you live. Peter Diamandis

buz-lh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.