ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Newportkrieger · 8 January 2011, 07:44 AM

Just wondering as I noticed a posting in here on a 16710. With all the changes to the Rolex line as of late, what is the generally accepted definition of "vintage"?

mike · 9 January 2011, 01:40 AM

In my view no.

Dan Pierce · 9 January 2011, 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike

In my view no.

Agreed. Discontinued and on there way to becoming vintage.
dP

MonBK · 9 January 2011, 01:54 AM

No

8 January 2011, 07:44 AM	#1
Newportkrieger Banned Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Steve Location: Newport Beach, CA Watch: GMT Master Pepsi Posts: 1,243	Are the 16710/16610 and varients now considered "vintage" Just wondering as I noticed a posting in here on a 16710. With all the changes to the Rolex line as of late, what is the generally accepted definition of "vintage"?

9 January 2011, 01:40 AM	#2
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	In my view no.

9 January 2011, 01:54 AM	#4
MonBK Banned Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Kingstown Posts: 58,281	No

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)