Which Do You Prefer DJ or DJII?

[SaddleSC]

I would recommend the classic 36mm size. It is just so comfortable and has perfect proportions. When I want to go bigger...that is what the sport models are for! This one is my favorite...

[cedargrove]

Originally Posted by SaddleSC

I would recommend the classic 36mm size. It is just so comfortable and has perfect proportions. When I want to go bigger...that is what the sport models are for! This one is my favorite...

If that's the 36mm then I agree, it looks great. I also really like the little romans outside the stick markers.

[Zed Homme]

I love the size of the DJII, but dont like how flat the bezel appears. Gonna have to go with the DJ on this one...

[Roselló]

My vote goes for the classic 36mm Datejust.

[crazycarlitos]

let's just say my GF has been wearing my DJ for last few months.. and she loves it.

[StarSovereign]

I love the 36mm size. It's the classic Rolex. I found the DJII, and the DDII, to be out of proportion; the bezel is just too large. Plus, I really wanted the jubilee band and the DDII did not offer it. The white dial is so classy too, I just had to add it to the small, but growing, collection.

[playingolf]

the original 36mm dj gets my vote...

[bmrowe]

I vote for the original DJ as well. I think the DJ is more elegant while the DJ II gives off a sportier more rugged look.

[girltime]

In the corporate arena I see many more men going with the larger dress watch. If you have a wrist that is 7.25 or larger, a DJII would look very nice on your wrist. I've seen some great DJII pics here of well it looks dressed casual.

[mdtddd2007]

I wish was in 40mm though. But given is 41 produced. I like it but on smooth Bezel. I would consider one if they make one. Which I am sure they will one day. Who knows maybe this year 8).

[fc3s2k]

36mm got my vote!!
own one but sold it!!! missed it ever since, got one today 36mm Rhodium Roman dial w/ super jubilee and absolutely love it.

[ral]

I think it would really depend on your wrist size which one is better for you. I really just cannot carry 41mm's. 38-39mm would have been best. So 36mm for me.

[MY-WATCH]

I was thinking DJ but my AD told me that I will probably will come back for DJ II in very short time because I will not be able to handel the small size for long

[jatco]

Originally Posted by rolexertion

Up to a point, bigger is better. A 36mm watch looks too small these days.

...It's not the size that counts, Its the quality...LOL - DJ TT V-serial -

[general]

It depends on:

1- Age. The more refined (older) members prefer the traditional, two tone, and smaller DJ. The younger buyer seems to gravitate towards the larger and more modern DJII.

2- Size. A large watch may not look suitable on a petite person.

3- Price. DJII has been on the market for a short amount of time and the prices tend to be higher for now.

4- Personal preference. This is probably the most deciding factor. Some may like a model because they are used to it or it appeals to his or her aesthetic sense.

5- Comfort. This may fall under the #4 since most people men start out wearing a 36mm watch, they feel more comfortable with it.

I hope this helps.

[WatchTimes]

OK
A lot of this has ot do with your wrist size.
I have smaller (6.8 in) wrist.
I have own a DJ (my first Rolex) and have owned a DJII.

With the DJ II most anyone can wear it.
If you have wrists under 7 in it is must sportier than dress.

Id say 7 in or smaller DJ II for casual wear and DD 36 mm for dress.
If you dress up often, have smaller wrists and can only have one I say 36 mm

[tdnt]

I have small wrists, so I much prefer the DJ. If i had larger wrists, I would be in two minds.

[Chad C.]

I have always thought the DJ was a beautiful watch but it was never one I was considering...until the DJII came out. Honestly, I think the DJII with silver dial and blue Arabic numbers is stunning!

I have an Explorer (36mm) now and I love it. It is a subtle watch and it still sings to me after having it a few years. My next watch I want to have a little more presence. I am pretty well set on a GMT IIc but that DJII did make me question my decision. I do think the GMT IIc may be a little more versatile though - which is why I am probably going in that direction.

[Rolex Freak]

Originally Posted by gqllc

I own both. I think it really depends on your taste and your size. I am 5' 10" 170pounds and the DJ looks slightly small. Not too small, just slightly small. I never noticed until I got the DJ2. The DJ2 makes more of a statement due to it's size. Both look good on my size frame. So basically if you are of smaller stature I would say go with the DJ....

I'm 5'4", 140lbs. So i guess the 36mm would be ok.

[sea-dweller]

Original DJ

[jamesbondOO7]

MY DJ 36 mm....

[AK40DJ50]

You need to try both on and compare. I did this several times and ended up going with the DJII which I love.

[bulldogdaddy]

Originally Posted by Rolex Freak

I'm 5'4", 140lbs. So i guess the 36mm would be ok.

I'm 6' 260lbs. And I AM older. (some other poster called it more refined :-)

My choice is the classic 36mm. BESIDES, you already have a bunch of larger mm watches, right?

I think the Sub, Panerai, and such watches are exactly the size they should be. But 40mm in a DJ plus seems, in my view to be a fad, even though I know many here would disagree. Where are the 40MM PP's and VC's BTW? I also remember bell bottoms, and platform shoes. Plain leg Levis came back, maybe never really went away. Bell bottoms? Well, who knows

[watchnut.com]

I have several 36mm Datejusts and like the 36mm size. For me, that's about right for a cross between a sport and dress watch.

When I first heard the rumors of a new generation, I was REALLY hoping for a 39mm case. I've always felt a 39mm Datejust would be a perfect Rolex.

I was surprised to see a 5mm case jump. But I also understand marketing (although not as well as Rolex does ) and larger watches are what's "in."

I like the 41mm version, but not enough to buy one; yet.....

[Alan111]

36mm get my vote.

In my opinion, Rolex really messed up on the 41mm size. They should have went with a 39mm case size, which would have been perfect. The bezel on the 41mm is just awful. They could have made it much nicer going with a 39mm case size.

[Wildwing]

Need you ask? The original 36mm:

[boa2]

I have a 7.5" wrist, and still prefer the look of the 36mm...on me. The DJII doesn't look great on my wrist, but it looks stunning on other folks. I think it's a matter of trying them and seeing what you like. They're both great!

[Rags]

36mm TT Datejust.

[jatco]

My only concern, issue, is the lack of micro-adjustments to the 'super' jubilee bracelet. I'm at the point that 2 links off is too loose and 1 link off is a tad snug. .. all depending on the time of year, season, heat etc etc.
I'm still in search of the 1.25 TT (18K) link, that I think, may fit me better, overall.
Someone on the boards mentioned to put 'anti-allergic' pad on the back of the watch.. but that, imo, is 'eau-contrair' - to a Rolex.
So.. Im dealing with the sizing issue...'weather' permitting...!?!?!