The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Classifieds > WatchOut!!!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 October 2017, 09:16 PM   #1
edtheaussie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
GMT II authentification help please :)

Hi guys,

Im looking at this GMT for sale, and was wondering if anyone can give me some advice on the authenticity? I've tried comparing it to online images but don't trust myself. The sale price is below market value so just trying to get an idea.

The seller is a bit difficult and could only get these photographs, but i will be inspecting watch (after travelling a while) in person, and wanted to know if the journey could be worth it? What things should i be checking out with the watch in hand?

Thanks!









edtheaussie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 09:22 PM   #2
VerticalHorizon
"TRF" Member
 
VerticalHorizon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Canada
Watch: 16710
Posts: 205
GMT II authentification help please 😊

We’d need much better pictures and to actually have the caseback opened, but as it sits, I don’t see any red flags.
May be a service dial with the combination of luminova, holes case, and hollow end links.
Do you know what year it’s supposed to be?
__________________
18038 | 16710 x 2 | 216570 | 214270 | 14000 | 79220N | 79280P x 2 | 3572.50 | 3576.50
VerticalHorizon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 09:25 PM   #3
edtheaussie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
I have asked, but not much information unfortunately @Verticalhorizon
edtheaussie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 09:29 PM   #4
VerticalHorizon
"TRF" Member
 
VerticalHorizon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Canada
Watch: 16710
Posts: 205
Quote:
Originally Posted by edtheaussie View Post
I have asked, but not much information unfortunately @Verticalhorizon


@edtheaussie

I will wait for the experts, but yeah, if you are unsure, I will meet him at a jeweller’s shop and have the caseback off and the markings between the lugs examined to be safe.
__________________
18038 | 16710 x 2 | 216570 | 214270 | 14000 | 79220N | 79280P x 2 | 3572.50 | 3576.50
VerticalHorizon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 09:32 PM   #5
samson66
2024 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 12,808
Looks legit to me

I like seeing an old Rolex with war wounds like that. Prefer that over a safe queen
samson66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 09:41 PM   #6
mato123
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Current Life
Watch: Omega, IWC
Posts: 95
Better pictures are needed to be sure. If the seller is not willing to help then it's probably for a reason and I'd passed on it. I sold watches before and I never had a problem to answer questions and provide additional pictures to prove the watch is genuine.
mato123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 10:09 PM   #7
edtheaussie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
It'll take me about 2 hours travel for the inspection, so i think i'm going to go at least check it out tomorrow anyway. Wish me luck!
edtheaussie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2017, 02:45 AM   #8
Dustytrail
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: In your basement?
Watch: Oysterquartz
Posts: 88
Very likely Genuine because replica 16710 have lower crown height to correspond with their modified GMT 2836-2 movement - they could never get this feature right.

Clasp is genuine

More pictures needed however to ascertain if this is franken watch

But so far I am strongly leaning to genuine as other features add up (e.g. end link number engraving, bezel teeth, handstack)
Dustytrail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2017, 05:45 AM   #9
edtheaussie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
Thanks for all the replies guys, and thank you to the moderators for moving my enquiry to the correct sub forum.

I'm just on my way to inspect the watch, I think if the serial places it in the late 1990s and the reference engraving looks good I will go for it. What esle should I be looking at specifically when I have the watch in hand?

Thanks,
Ed
edtheaussie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2017, 07:39 AM   #10
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,152
What is the order of the hands bottom to top


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2017, 08:22 AM   #11
edtheaussie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
From what I can tell it is Hour/GMT/min/sec - which would be correct but will check with watch in hand.

Last edited by edtheaussie; 21 October 2017 at 08:27 AM.. Reason: incorrect written
edtheaussie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2017, 08:27 AM   #12
edtheaussie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
-sorry double post

Last edited by edtheaussie; 21 October 2017 at 08:28 AM.. Reason: double post
edtheaussie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2017, 08:55 AM   #13
GLADIATOR
"TRF" Member
 
GLADIATOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Costa Blanca,
Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA
Posts: 5,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by crowncollection View Post
What is the order of the hands bottom to top


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sadly this is not a golden bullet test anymore, but it's the right question to ask
Adam
__________________
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill
"We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."
GLADIATOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2017, 01:59 PM   #14
Vishy26
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Krishna
Location: Australia
Posts: 611
Watch looks good to me. Based on what you said about the seller, I suggest you give this a pass.
Vishy26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2017, 02:26 PM   #15
Dustytrail
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: In your basement?
Watch: Oysterquartz
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by crowncollection View Post
What is the order of the hands bottom to top


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
First picture shows the red gmt hand overlaps the hour hand which suggests genuine

It's true that this is no longer the definitive way of distinguishing a replica/genuine GMT Rolex as the latest replica 116710 has the correct handstack using a modified 2824-2 movement (with an added module). But to my knowledge, non of the older replica 16710 ever had a reliable correct handstack movement and even if this example did have a correct handstack, the crown height and crownguard corresponds to genuine
Dustytrail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2017, 07:32 PM   #16
edtheaussie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
I got the watch, thanks for all the help guys!

It is a 1996-7 serial with a service dial, as the dial glows but the hands do not. I might try to source a tritium dial so if i want to make it 'correct' in the future i can. The watch is in good condition, bevels present and the bracelet clasp number matches the year of watch.

edtheaussie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.