ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 August 2014, 12:26 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
|
Maybe a bit small...but overall, not bad...
If you like it, go for it. |
6 August 2014, 12:39 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Joseph
Location: Rockwall TX
Watch: Lots
Posts: 1,223
|
The size of the watch looks good to me...and in reality size is over rated... A 36mm date just or day date probably wouldn't even look terrible...but I think I'm in the minority here.
|
6 August 2014, 12:59 AM | #33 |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,509
|
That looks very good!
|
6 August 2014, 02:57 AM | #34 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,278
|
|
6 August 2014, 03:03 AM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 14,783
|
Looks great.....
__________________
|
6 August 2014, 03:06 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Sebastien
Location: South East Asia
Posts: 788
|
Looks good on you. Will look even better without the plastics :)
Not a fan of TT personally though |
6 August 2014, 03:39 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Bruce
Location: Alexandria, VA
Watch: EXP II, DJ,PP5066
Posts: 1,597
|
Great!👍
__________________
Bruce, 16570 Explorer II, DJ 16234 DJ 16013, 6466, 1947 Rolex Oyster, JLC Grande Reverso 976, PP 5066, Ellipse, Omega Seamaster |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.