ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 December 2017, 05:15 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York
Posts: 67
|
+15/s a day...
My sea dweller that I just got from a local Rolex dealer/jeweler appears to be running nearly 15s fast in a day. I synced it exactly with my computer at 10am yesterday, and by 10am today, the time on the computer was changing at 15s mark instead of right on nose at 12.
I know a small variance is acceptable, but is this acceptable for a 1999 Sea Dweller? I called and they said no problem to bring it in and they would adjust it, when I went in toady, a different woman, who I didn't speak to the day before said that Rolexs that are older aren't as accurate and that everyone knows this, then some other customer next to me said his loses a minute a day. Don't know what the point of buying such an exacting and expensive instrument is if I need to adjust the time every few days. Am I right to think it needs servicing or adjusting? Regardless, they did take it in and are going to adjust it for me under warranty. |
13 December 2017, 05:30 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
-4 +6 is what the tolerance used to be (if I remember correctly). Has it ever been serviced? See how it does after they regulate it. If it keeps consistent time then it’s probably fine, if not have it serviced, IMO. Cheers and congrats on the SD!
__________________
|
13 December 2017, 05:36 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York
Posts: 67
|
Quote:
If they don't fix it I might send it to RSC for a service and polish (since I intend on keeping this) |
|
13 December 2017, 05:36 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Idaho Falls, ID
Watch: Only the 114060
Posts: 380
|
It's good the piece came with a warranty. Have them regulate it first.
|
13 December 2017, 06:01 AM | #5 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 42,991
|
Checking it with your "computer" is not a very good check. Computers update periodically from whatever source they are receiving a signal from and can jump around quite a bit.
A '99 Rolex should be able to be regulated to within a couple of seconds a day, either way. It may have a slightly different variance when worn on the wrist though.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
13 December 2017, 06:13 AM | #6 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,249
|
Quote:
|
|
13 December 2017, 06:20 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,755
|
+-15 is a bit much. Fast is preferable since you only have to pull the crown to retain accuracy and not advance the time. If it's consistent it's no big deal for them to calm it down a bit.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
13 December 2017, 06:22 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: New York
Watch: me go broke!
Posts: 1,657
|
Think COSC is -2/+4
15 is way too high and the reps explanation is nonsense. |
13 December 2017, 06:26 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,443
|
Quote:
The statement that "older Rolexes aren't as accurate" is a total crock of sh*t. Ridiculous to say the least. And, unfortunately, not rare in the world of Rolex sales. |
|
13 December 2017, 06:27 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,755
|
x2 I just hope they know what they're doing when they take the back off.. if they get that far. With nonsense like that I'd be tempted to live with it until you find someone who knows what's what. It's a cheap fix.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
13 December 2017, 07:06 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
|
I expect a proper regulation should get close to COSC.
|
13 December 2017, 07:15 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Here
Posts: 923
|
Definitely don't just use your computer clock, that isn't reliable.
Check it over at least a few days, checking in daily and keep track of it using time.is or time.gov. I always make sure I refresh the page and don't just use the one that has been open for a long time. See where you're at. If it's still 15s off then I would have it looked at because that would be too much for me. COSC of -4 to +6 should be easy to achieve. You can also play with resting position overnight if you take if off. Some positions run faster or slower, though modern Rolex watches don't seem to move much. My Sub runs a touch slow on my wrist (-.1/3s) but when I rest it crown down at night it gaines some back and I've been averaging about +.4s per day over the last month...and that is consistent, I check it each morning and it's always just barely creeping ahead at around that .4s/d. |
13 December 2017, 08:11 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,377
|
|
13 December 2017, 09:17 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York
Posts: 67
|
So far resting position hasn't made any notable difference, in the position Rolex suggests to lose speed, it still speeds up.
It is in for service with them right now for a regulation. I'll update when I get it back. |
13 December 2017, 10:10 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 590
|
Yeah, way too fast. Older Rolexes can certainly be regulated to within CoSC. My 2001 Sub is within 0.5 sec/day or better on my wrist, although I do position it to regulate over night.
|
13 December 2017, 11:14 AM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,649
|
To fast that would bother me if adjusting doesn't solve the issue then I would have it serviced..
|
13 December 2017, 04:41 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Here
Watch: SpeedyPro Explorer
Posts: 235
|
If you use smartphone, one app that I can suggest to check your watch with is Emerald Time. It's free.
|
13 December 2017, 04:45 PM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,695
|
See post 5.
__________________
E |
14 December 2017, 03:31 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,888
|
+15 wouldn't bother me.
__________________
RRGHOST1 |
14 December 2017, 03:38 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Russ
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 5,760
|
OP, a 24 hour time period isn't enough time to properly evaluate the timing. Wear it normally for at least a week and average the rate variance.
__________________
Russ |
14 December 2017, 03:40 AM | #21 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,122
|
|
14 December 2017, 03:43 AM | #22 |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,445
|
That's a 3135 movement, capable of +1 s/day consistently.
|
14 December 2017, 03:51 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Kristofer
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: my feet.
Posts: 2,364
|
I sync with time.is and I use an app called Toolwatch to check daily variance. Seems to keep me sane now
__________________
No sticker left behind. "Better three hours too soon, than a minute too late." "All we have to do is decide what to do with the time that is given to us." ref. 116520 Daytona - 10/2014 |
14 December 2017, 05:11 AM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
|
Time.gov is official NIST time in the US. The site is compensated for internet delay. I swear by it.
|
14 December 2017, 05:34 AM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
|
|
15 December 2017, 08:42 AM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Home!
Posts: 3,307
|
+15 sec per day means aprox. 99,97% accuracy BUT for a Rolex it’s too much!!
|
15 December 2017, 09:12 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Igor
Location: new york
Watch: DJ41, subC, BLRN
Posts: 139
|
My Datejust 41 is running about +4 to 5 seconds a day also. It’s bothering me, but I am not too crazy about sending it in to service just for that...
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.