Deepsea Monster Hands On

[Kingranch]

Originally Posted by GB-man

The entire concept is stupid marketing nonsense. A wristwatch is meant be worn on a human. There is absolutely no function strapping one to the side of a submarine. Now they have taken the marketing stunt with JC further by pretending this watch is of any value to anyone let alone the msrp. Even the DSSD are foolish to be honest.

Easy....

[danwang0520]

that's a really ridiculous large watch.......looks way too large on an average wrist

[Maverick Timepieces]

I dont mind it actually. I

[VogelPhoenix]

Originally Posted by amh

Sure, on a 5.5" wrist. The other thread has someone with a 7.5" and it actually looks ok.

You do know that virtually every G-shock is this size and there are thousands (millions?) of people wearing them.

The bigger G-Shocks are typically 16-17mm thick, not 23. The DSC head-on shots look ~ok on sufficiently large wrists, as they hide the ~2:1 width/thickness aspect ratio.

[Roger Lococco]

Originally Posted by HiBoost

Rolex blew it on this one. In order to achieve a depth rating which would instantly kill any human they made a monstrous watch that looks ridiculous on everyone.

Fully agree


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[HORNBLOWER]

The Anchor....

[LateLearner]

Big Ben.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[IamJacky]

That is way too big... makes the DEEPSEA look like a toy watch, very interesting nonetheless, thanks for sharing!

[cramsey]

I was able to try one on at my AD today, as well. I could probably wear it, on my 8" wrist, I'm just not sure why I would. Maybe for the hardcore collector who has one of everything...

[RW16610]

It's a cool piece of engineering, no doubt. I would love to own one as a keepsake due to my fascination with dive watches and the history behind them, particularly from this brand. However, very few people would actually be able to pull off wearing this comfortably or at all.

Thanks for sharing these pictures! Glad to see some of the first actual shots of the piece.

[Airbag79]

That Invicta is siiiick!!

[Bxtek]

Wow, that thing is crazy huge! Would be cool to see one in person and try it on, but definitely a hard pass for me to own it.

[Peanut1pool]

Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR

I've worn a 53mm watch in the past. Here it is as a reference on the size difference. I've still got it but don't wear it.

What’s the reference on 2nd left?

[ramitimeout]

wow i love it, i have an 8inch wrist so i think i can pull it off, the DSSD looks already perfect on me
thanks for sharing !

[Sauzo]

That thing is insane. Wish my AD had one so I could try it on. I imagine it would look ridiculous on my 7 inch wrist.

[schwoo]

Depending on How many they make, it might be limited edition. If Arnold Schwarzenegger or Sylvester Stallone starts wearing one, I could see this as taking off. Definitely would have to see it in person.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[htc8p]

OMG that is a beast no matter how you slice it. i have seen the ultra deep it's also a beast but a least looks more fun

[Lrd2sea]

Originally Posted by Kingranch

Could double as a belt buckle.

or a brass knuckle

[Loujo]

I heard Aaron Rogers is getting one. His team is sinking fast.

[tquieng]

This is to be worn on your ankle

[Watch-Geek]

Originally Posted by amh

Sure, on a 5.5" wrist. The other thread has someone with a 7.5" and it actually looks ok.



You do know that virtually every G-shock is this size and there are thousands (millions?) of people wearing them.

My favorite G-Shock on a 6.7" wrist.
The digital Submariner DW-5000



Sent from my SM-A415F using Tapatalk

[Daveh777]

This watch only makes sense if you view it as a Novelty. Not a real thing intended to be worn under water.

[malb85]

The ugliest, most absurd watch Rolex have ever made. It’s like they released it as a joke to see how far they can push people who will buying made by Rolex.

22k too ��

[travisb]

Crazy big. Thanks for the pics.

[jaySL350]

Horrid and thick as a brick,,,,,

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by RW16610

It's a cool piece of engineering, no doubt. I would love to own one as a keepsake due to my fascination with dive watches and the history behind them, particularly from this brand. However, very few people would actually be able to pull off wearing this comfortably or at all.

Thanks for sharing these pictures! Glad to see some of the first actual shots of the piece.

That’s really well said Rommel

[1William]

Thanks for sharing.

[Popolos]

Thanks for sharing. It's a real monster!

[Krash]

Originally Posted by sleepydoc

Wow. The picture with it beside the other watches really shows the mind blowing size of this thing.

Yes, and even more so when you take into account that the Submariner is too big for many people on TRF.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[amh]

Originally Posted by LateLearner

Big Ben.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes!

Originally Posted by cramsey

I was able to try one on at my AD today, as well. I could probably wear it, on my 8" wrist, I'm just not sure why I would. Maybe for the hardcore collector who has one of everything...

Waiting for such pics from someone.

Yes, it's totally unnecessary, yes it's big. Not sure why this bothers so many Don't buy it!