ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 July 2020, 11:30 PM | #31 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 522
|
__________________
https://www.instagram.com/vintage_georgex/ |
2 July 2020, 11:56 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Davide
Location: Italy
Watch: RO/ROO/PAM/DAYTONA
Posts: 402
|
Wonderful.
__________________
5167-5711 6217-8001 16520A-16520E-16500-116610LV-166710LN-16760-16030-16570T- ROO(Ti)-RO-ROC PAN0055-PAM351-PAM733-PAM721 Type XX-XXI |
3 July 2020, 04:03 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 688
|
I'd also not do it but I just wanted to be informed
__________________
Rolex ♛ GMT-Master 1675 BLRO | Rolex ♛ Submariner 1680 RED | Rolex ♛ Submariner 5513 MF | Rolex ♛ Submariner 114060 | Omega Ω Speedmaster 105.012 |
3 July 2020, 04:07 AM | #34 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 522
|
A GMT 1675 without cyclope is absolutely ok.
Back that time you had the choice with or without to buy it. From Rolex Dealer himself. https://www.instagram.com/vintage_georgex/
__________________
https://www.instagram.com/vintage_georgex/ |
4 July 2020, 07:13 AM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 2,958
|
I love the no cyclops look on vintage GMTs and considering it myself. If I do, I plan to go the True Dome route: https://www.rescapement.com/blog/tru...-vintage-rolex
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.