The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 September 2015, 01:24 PM   #1
alexhmng
"TRF" Member
 
alexhmng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Alex Ng
Location: Oceanside, CA
Watch: 1967 Oyster
Posts: 10
Production year? Oyster Precision

I need some help on finding out whether this watch was produced in 1961 or 1966.

The serial number is 1,489,XXX. The internet is not helping at all (examples below).

1. According to Bobswatches, the production year for this serial # is 1966.
https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-serial-numbers

2. According to Bernardwatch & watches.co.uk, the production year for this serial # is 1961.
http://www.bernardwatch.com/Rolex-Serial-Numbers
http://www.watches.co.uk/information...erial-numbers/

Thanks in advance!

*This watch was given to me by my dad when he passed away 3 years ago. He purchased this watch back in 1 May 1968 in Nauru.
This watch is all original and has never been serviced or opened. It is still keeping accurate time.







alexhmng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2015, 02:09 PM   #2
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,356
You're looking at around 1966. There might be a stamp inside the case back that will tell you the quarter and year (not sure if they stamped the case back on manual wind oysters). Bobs and Bernard are two of the less reliable sources for serial number reference (to put it mildly). You're better off with http://www.qualitytyme.net/pages/numbers.html and https://www.minus4plus6.com/numbers.htm. Or if you really want to go in-depth, click on the Rolex Serial Number Project at http://www.vintagerolexforum.com/. Great looking watch. Looks like a 6426? There should also be a month/year stamp on the bracelet clasp.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2015, 02:27 PM   #3
alexhmng
"TRF" Member
 
alexhmng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Alex Ng
Location: Oceanside, CA
Watch: 1967 Oyster
Posts: 10
Thanks for the info, OEB. Appreciate the help!! I can see the tiny month/year stamp on the bracelet clasp (3 67).
alexhmng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2015, 02:33 PM   #4
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,356
No problem. Is there a date stamp on the clasp? Could be 65, 66 or 67. The bracelet, case, dial, movement were all made spearately, so there is no official manufacture date really. I have a 1,5 serial Datejust with a late 66 caseback, 67 bracelet and 68 warranty paper.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2015, 02:37 PM   #5
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,039
Why not use our chart. It would date the watch at around 66/67, keeping in mind that all charts are guesses.

A mid 60's watch should have a date stamp inside the case-back but I would say that since the paper is dated 5/68 that it's a '67 watch..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2015, 02:40 PM   #6
alexhmng
"TRF" Member
 
alexhmng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Alex Ng
Location: Oceanside, CA
Watch: 1967 Oyster
Posts: 10
Yes, on the clasp. Date stamp of 67 with a 3 on top.

alexhmng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2015, 02:46 PM   #7
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexhmng View Post
Yes, on the clasp. Date stamp of 67 with a 3 on top.
March 1967. What was your dad doing on Nauru? Phosphate mining? Military? I used to work on the inflight magazine for Air Nauru for a short time in the mid 1990s.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2015, 02:51 PM   #8
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,356
By the way my 1.5 mill, 1966 stamped Datejust mentioned above also has the 3/67 clasp, and sold on a US air base in Spain in October 68. If I was a bettng man I would guess your casebsck is stamped first or second quarter 66. If you get it serviced, ask them to make a note.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2015, 03:00 PM   #9
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,194
Here is a serial number, case back chart that I have put together from actual watches.

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=350245

Based on this chart, 1966 was probably the actual production date and is most likely the date you'll find stamped inside the case back as others mentioned. Back then, and based on my experience, it was normally three to four years after the case back date before the watch was sold. The case back info only indicates when it was stamped and by the time the watch was assembled/disassembled, certifications done and shipping to Rolex dealers or distribution, you'll find that it was normally three or four years before the watch was sold. Your watch appears to fit all those parameters.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2015, 03:04 PM   #10
alexhmng
"TRF" Member
 
alexhmng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Alex Ng
Location: Oceanside, CA
Watch: 1967 Oyster
Posts: 10
I am guessing phosphate mining from the mid 50s until mid 80s. He was also a cook and a vehicle mechanic on that island. During those years, he traveled back and forth to Hong Kong and China often. It is amazing that you have a part in Nauru. Small world.

I lived in Nauru from 80-84 when I was 3-7 yrs old. I enjoyed that little island. When was the last time you visited Nauru? It has been 31 years for me and I would love to see that place one more time.
alexhmng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2015, 03:09 PM   #11
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexhmng View Post
I am guessing phosphate mining from the mid 50s until mid 80s. He was also a cook and a vehicle mechanic on that island. During those years, he traveled back and forth to Hong Kong and China often. It is amazing that you have a part in Nauru. Small world.

I lived in Nauru from 80-84 when I was 3-7 yrs old. I enjoyed that little island. When was the last time you visited Nauru? It has been 31 years for me and I would love to see that place one more time.
I've never been. I worked for a publishing company in HK that produced inflight mags for about a dozen international airlines. The Air Nauru mag was more of an inflight audio entertainment guide really. I think after the phosphate was used up it's become full of refugees and boat people outsourced by the Aussie government, sadly.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2015, 03:20 PM   #12
alexhmng
"TRF" Member
 
alexhmng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Alex Ng
Location: Oceanside, CA
Watch: 1967 Oyster
Posts: 10
Agree. Nothing much going on in Nauru these days and not worth the trouble getting there. I would go only for the memories.
alexhmng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2015, 03:21 PM   #13
alexhmng
"TRF" Member
 
alexhmng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Alex Ng
Location: Oceanside, CA
Watch: 1967 Oyster
Posts: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
Here is a serial number, case back chart that I have put together from actual watches.

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=350245

Based on this chart, 1966 was probably the actual production date and is most likely the date you'll find stamped inside the case back as others mentioned. Back then, and based on my experience, it was normally three to four years after the case back date before the watch was sold. The case back info only indicates when it was stamped and by the time the watch was assembled/disassembled, certifications done and shipping to Rolex dealers or distribution, you'll find that it was normally three or four years before the watch was sold. Your watch appears to fit all those parameters.
Great info. Appreciate the help!!
alexhmng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2015, 10:24 AM   #14
gregorpal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Myplaceintheworld
Posts: 335
very nice watch. references like 6426 /7 or 6422, are so nice, elegante and classy, and case, though 34mm, lugs are a bit longer than 5500 / 1002 which give them a bigger size.
34mm size some day will be back!
gregorpal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2015, 05:13 PM   #15
Mark020
"TRF" Member
 
Mark020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,089
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
March 1967.
Third quarter of 1967 :-)
Mark020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2015, 05:25 PM   #16
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark020 View Post
Third quarter of 1967 :-)
Bracelets show the month, casebacks show the quarter, no?
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2015, 10:02 AM   #17
mineral
"TRF" Member
 
mineral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,670
Agreed with you

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregorpal View Post
very nice watch. references like 6426 /7 or 6422, are so nice, elegante and classy, and case, though 34mm, lugs are a bit longer than 5500 / 1002 which give them a bigger size.
34mm size some day will be back!
Love those 34mm size
mineral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2015, 11:16 PM   #18
MahdiyaDad
"TRF" Member
 
MahdiyaDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Here and there
Watch: Sea-Dweller
Posts: 196
That's a great looking time piece, and a neat story behind it. Wear it in good health. :)
MahdiyaDad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2015, 05:43 AM   #19
Mark020
"TRF" Member
 
Mark020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,089
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
Bracelets show the month, casebacks show the quarter, no?
Nope. Both quarter.
Mark020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.