ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Arclight · 13 February 2017, 01:24 AM

I love the clean 5711 dial but I believe that it would be even more beautiful and balanced without the date window.

My understanding is that Patek no longer produces bespoke versions but perhaps if enough were interested...

The question is would you be?

archer75 · 13 February 2017, 01:28 AM

Not a bad idea

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

goog53 · 13 February 2017, 01:39 AM

Prefer the date myself

Hollister · 13 February 2017, 04:06 AM

I'd vastly prefer it without the window and that white date wheel. It makes sense with the white-dialled version (which I'm not too fond of), but not with the gorgeous blue dial, IMO.

soundserious · 13 February 2017, 11:39 AM

No date would be historically incorrect. Has there every been a Nautilus without a date?

subtona · 13 February 2017, 11:47 AM

Absolutely.

Perhaps a nice manual movement as well.

WAK4 · 13 February 2017, 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by subtona

Absolutely.

Perhaps a nice manual movement as well.

That'd be interesting... Would have to change my vote to yes

BNA/LION · 13 February 2017, 12:35 PM

Voted Yes

mps354 · 13 February 2017, 01:15 PM

I'd prefer one without the date, but not enough to get rid of my current 5711. Now if they came out with a manual wind version as Gus suggested, I'd be all over it

KarlS · 13 February 2017, 04:12 PM

Date

topcat30093 · 13 February 2017, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goog53

Prefer the date myself

I agree

Arclight · 13 February 2017, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soundserious

No date would be historically incorrect. Has there every been a Nautilus without a date?

There has not, but consider the Sub Date. It broke from historical tradition and now outsells the Sub by a wide margin.

1William · 13 February 2017, 09:37 PM

I prefer it the way that it is.

Arclight · 14 February 2017, 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by subtona

Absolutely.

Perhaps a nice manual movement as well.

And perhaps eliminate the second hand as well.

masyv6 · 14 February 2017, 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by subtona

Absolutely.

Perhaps a nice manual movement as well.

x2

A no-date 5711 would be a stunner

unknown · 14 February 2017, 02:53 AM

dates are ugly, that hole in the dials messes up the dial
Watches without date ar much better

Trog · 14 February 2017, 03:19 AM

Manual wind, no date...count me in.

Watchflair · 14 February 2017, 03:58 AM

I'm a fan of the way it is. No manual movement for me. To me it represents the perfect daily watch - clean classic understated.

Prefer the date window and automatic for daily use. They could throw a micro rotor in like on the 5712 for good measure :)

soundserious · 14 February 2017, 01:48 PM

A manual winding stainless steel modern sport watch. Brilliant.

.db · 14 February 2017, 02:16 PM

Simply adding a border to the date window (like the /011 and 5711R) would make a big difference to me.

Arclight · 14 February 2017, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by .db

Simply adding a border to the date window (like the /011 and 5711R) would make a big difference to me.

Yes, I agree. You will have to find a 1P!

Arclight · 14 February 2017, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soundserious

A manual winding stainless steel modern sport watch. Brilliant.

Check out the 3670A

http://watchesbysjx.com/2011/10/pate...-movement.html

aeon888 · 15 February 2017, 01:39 AM

I love the look of no-date watches. Less time of "screwing" the crown to change dates. Less chance of screwing the watch.

Arclight · 15 February 2017, 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aeon888

I love the look of no-date watches. Less time of "screwing" the crown to change dates. Less chance of screwing the watch.

Yes my friend, there are far better things to screw!

.db · 15 February 2017, 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arclight

Yes, I agree. You will have to find a 1P!

I forgot about the P! The perfect look.

soundserious · 15 February 2017, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arclight

Check out the 3670A

http://watchesbysjx.com/2011/10/pate...-movement.html

That's an epic watch for sure!

Hairdude1 · 15 February 2017, 02:42 PM

I prefer the date

View Poll Results: No Date Patek 5711 ...interested?
Yes	41	37.61%
No	68	62.39%
Voters: 109. You may not vote on this poll

13 February 2017, 01:24 AM	#1
Arclight Banned Join Date: Mar 2013 Real Name: Rob Location: New York Watch: Rolex Posts: 577	No Date Patek 5711 ...interested? I love the clean 5711 dial but I believe that it would be even more beautiful and balanced without the date window. My understanding is that Patek no longer produces bespoke versions but perhaps if enough were interested... The question is would you be?

13 February 2017, 01:39 AM	#3
goog53 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Mike G Location: Ohio Watch: Rolex-Patek-AP Posts: 3,060	Prefer the date myself __________________ The only thing better than the watches are the people behind them. "The best watch in the world is the one that's on your wrist." Morgan King "Do you like having a good time? Then you need a good watch!" Rocky Balboa

13 February 2017, 11:39 AM	#5
soundserious "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: usofmfa Posts: 3,157	No date would be historically incorrect. Has there every been a Nautilus without a date? __________________ Instagram: soundsoserious

13 February 2017, 11:47 AM	#6
subtona "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: gus Location: East Coast Watch: APK & sometimes Y Posts: 25,997	Absolutely. Perhaps a nice manual movement as well. __________________

13 February 2017, 01:28 AM	#2
archer75 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2015 Location: Istanbul Watch: PP-AP- FPJ Posts: 403	Not a bad idea Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

13 February 2017, 04:06 AM	#4
Hollister Banned Join Date: Apr 2016 Real Name: James Location: UK Watch: 114300 Posts: 1,750	I'd vastly prefer it without the window and that white date wheel. It makes sense with the white-dialled version (which I'm not too fond of), but not with the gorgeous blue dial, IMO.

13 February 2017, 12:35 PM	#8
BNA/LION 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Larry Location: San Diego, CA Watch: ROLEX Posts: 25,206	Voted Yes __________________ ✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ Daytona C 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ NEXT-->? ⛳ Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron.

13 February 2017, 01:15 PM	#9
mps354 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: Mike Location: CT Posts: 8,972	I'd prefer one without the date, but not enough to get rid of my current 5711. Now if they came out with a manual wind version as Gus suggested, I'd be all over it

13 February 2017, 04:12 PM	#10
KarlS Banned Join Date: Nov 2015 Real Name: Karl Location: Kuwait Posts: 5,228	Date

13 February 2017, 09:37 PM	#13
1William 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex/Others Posts: 44,749	I prefer it the way that it is.

14 February 2017, 02:53 AM	#16
unknown "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Europe Posts: 2,802	dates are ugly, that hole in the dials messes up the dial Watches without date ar much better __________________ Instagram : @collectible_watches

14 February 2017, 03:19 AM	#17
Trog Banned Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: Great White North Posts: 696	Manual wind, no date...count me in.

14 February 2017, 03:58 AM	#18
Watchflair 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: Jim Location: Westchester NY Watch: 116500 116518LN Posts: 5,876	I'm a fan of the way it is. No manual movement for me. To me it represents the perfect daily watch - clean classic understated. Prefer the date window and automatic for daily use. They could throw a micro rotor in like on the 5712 for good measure :) __________________ Remember what matters. Value everyday

14 February 2017, 01:48 PM	#19
soundserious "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: usofmfa Posts: 3,157	A manual winding stainless steel modern sport watch. Brilliant. __________________ Instagram: soundsoserious

14 February 2017, 02:16 PM	#20
.db "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: California Posts: 398	Simply adding a border to the date window (like the /011 and 5711R) would make a big difference to me.

15 February 2017, 01:39 AM	#23
aeon888 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Midwest Posts: 746	I love the look of no-date watches. Less time of "screwing" the crown to change dates. Less chance of screwing the watch.

15 February 2017, 02:42 PM	#27
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156	I prefer the date __________________ Instagram: @Hairdude Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238 16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped) Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)