Omega seamster vs sub

[Marcus09]

Originally Posted by JacksonStone

Which 007? I'm having a similar experience with the standard Seamaster 300 MCAC. It's a nice watch in its own right, but it's heavier than the Sub, and top-heavy to boot. I also can't get the bracelet to fit the way I want. I don't really want to flip it, but I'm just not feeling it these days. That may mean its days are numbered. I'll wait another year and see how I feel....maybe.

2008 Quantum of solace. I want to flip it too, but at the same time I'm hesitating a lot because of past bad experiences when selling a watch. Maybe I'll wait more since its prices are going up, especially this particular model and mine is numbered 8282/10,007

IMG_1520.jpgIMG_1519.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Robbyman]

Submariner any day of the week. No matter what model it is, I would always choose the Submariner. Utterly gorgeous and totally classic. The Seamaster is not even close, especially those 1990's Bond things. Everybody knows Bond wore a Rolex and no matter how much money is spent to advertise a product it will never change the truth.

[Terpits]

SM300 master co-ax.

Any other SM, then sub for me.