The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 September 2015, 04:17 PM   #31
2JHead
"TRF" Member
 
2JHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Western Europe
Posts: 609
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent65 View Post
Some people just don't want to accept the apparently unthinkable possibility that a watch hasn't been polished before! Haha. There are some owners who simply either didn't wear their watch much, or never had it serviced. Just did nothing - for decades. It does happen. Basic law of probability; millions made and sold, not all were worn heavily or serviced multiple times. Some... never. Making absolute statements about something someone has never owned, held or even seen in person is a bit silly. IMHO...
I love the watch and it is certainly better than my red sub, but unpolished...gonna have to agree with Springer here.

It has evidence of service as it has a servie or possibly aftermarket crystal.

It has an inconsistency in the 11 o'clock lug chamfer that looks non-factory.

The CG's look polished (although not alot)

Don't wanna talk down the watch but well it is a discussion forum.
2JHead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 September 2015, 04:58 PM   #32
Vincent65
"TRF" Member
 
Vincent65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2JHead View Post
I love the watch and it is certainly better than my red sub, but unpolished...gonna have to agree with Springer here.

It has evidence of service as it has a servie or possibly aftermarket crystal.

It has an inconsistency in the 11 o'clock lug chamfer that looks non-factory.

The CG's look polished (although not alot)

Don't wanna talk down the watch but well it is a discussion forum.
Everyone's entitled to an opinion, of course. And yes, well, it is a discussion forum - correct!

So now it's 'possibly' an 'after-market crystal' as well?! Maybe something else is amiss as well?

Regardless, almost anyone can change a crystal (even me) - doesn't necessarily mean it's been to a RSC, been serviced by anyone at all, or been polished. This one may have been serviced independently; and we are all speculating here (except, perhaps, the new owner/seller/previous owner who may know things no-one else does about the history of the watch, and it has therefore been stated that it's unpolished).

My MKIV 1680 is unpolished, and the dealer had a new crystal put on it at my request, although I saw it first with the original one installed and that was also supplied with the watch. Still got the old, beaten-up original. Didn't go to RSC to have genuine Rolex crystal installed. Wasn't polished either.

As for 'non-factory inconsistencies' - again that is subjective, and there's been plenty of discussions and photographic evidence (NOS examples, and even Rolex catalogue photos) where lugs and CGs are not precisely symmetrical.


Edit: and by the way, I see no inconsistency on the 11'oclock lug chamfer, or anywhere else on this case. Please point out what you mean.
__________________
https://www.rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=80782&dateline=139659  8629
Vincent65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 September 2015, 06:47 PM   #33
buenosdias
"TRF" Member
 
buenosdias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: SeB
Location: Germany
Watch: MaD_aT_gMt
Posts: 1,219
Huge congrats!!!! Fantastic RedSub
__________________
aLL ThE BeSt, SeB

buenosdiasone on instagram
buenosdias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 September 2015, 06:53 PM   #34
The_Walrus
"TRF" Member
 
The_Walrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: George
Location: Sydney
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,104
Beauty, congrats
The_Walrus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 September 2015, 08:52 PM   #35
TimeToGo
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent65 View Post
Some people just don't want to accept the apparently unthinkable possibility that a watch hasn't been polished before! Haha. There are some owners who simply either didn't wear their watch much, or never had it serviced. Just did nothing - for decades. It does happen. Basic law of probability; millions made and sold, not all were worn heavily or serviced multiple times. Some... never. Making absolute statements about something someone has never owned, held or even seen in person is a bit silly. IMHO...
You are babbling...

How can you say people are not willing to accept the "unthinkable" or basic law of probability...Bla, bla, bla.. Of course there are unpolished watches out there!

The pictures are clear and indeed a very nice watch but the chamfers are not original.

So then, Mr. Vincen65, my question to you is - Do you think this case is "unpolished"...that this case was not refreshed?
TimeToGo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 September 2015, 09:08 PM   #36
Vincent65
"TRF" Member
 
Vincent65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeToGo View Post
You are babbling...

How can you say people are not willing to accept the "unthinkable" or basic law of probability...Bla, bla, bla.. Of course there are unpolished watches out there!

The pictures are clear and indeed a very nice watch but the chamfers are not original.

So then, Mr. Vincen65, my question to you is - Do you think this case is "unpolished"...that this case was not refreshed?
Blah blah babbling bollox yourself, 'Mr. Time To Go' - ask Andrew Shear, because you're essentially calling him and/or the OP a liar.

How can you say you know it's been polished? Did you polish it?
__________________
https://www.rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=80782&dateline=139659  8629
Vincent65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 September 2015, 09:21 PM   #37
TimeToGo
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent65 View Post
Blah blah babbling bollox yourself, 'Mr. Time To Go' - ask Andrew Shear, because you're essentially calling him and/or the OP a liar.

How can you say you know it's been polished? Did you polish it?
I figured you would not answer the question.
TimeToGo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 September 2015, 09:23 PM   #38
Vincent65
"TRF" Member
 
Vincent65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeToGo View Post
I figured you would not answer the question.
Likewise
You didn't answer mine.

And, for the record, Mr. Vincent65 doesn't think it's been polished.

Now you answer my question, wise-guy.
__________________
https://www.rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=80782&dateline=139659  8629
Vincent65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 September 2015, 09:27 PM   #39
1675-David
"TRF" Member
 
1675-David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 6,010
lovely watch, congratulations! Andrew Shear always has the best examples..
1675-David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 September 2015, 09:36 PM   #40
Presa canary
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Justin
Location: Pa
Watch: Explorer ii
Posts: 3,150
Stunning...
Back to eating popcorn
Presa canary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 September 2015, 10:47 PM   #41
stillsane
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Tom T
Location: Illinois
Watch: 1680, 214270, BLNR
Posts: 168
I would be proud to own that one.
stillsane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 September 2015, 12:41 AM   #42
teohache
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: dominican republi
Posts: 10
service crystal

OHH yes it has one service one the firts pics, and know a Superdome change in less then 10 minute, and original top hat of the watch on the house. Always gonna be diferent thinking but i know what i get and from who i acquired.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_4102.jpg (37.1 KB, 290 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_4103.jpg (39.1 KB, 289 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_4104-1.jpg (36.0 KB, 288 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_4105.jpg (45.5 KB, 288 views)
teohache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 September 2015, 01:41 AM   #43
teohache
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: dominican republi
Posts: 10
By the way

Agree with Vincent, only 3 people knows for sure, ( past owner ( came from a family), Dealer ( Andrew Shear) and owner ( me ). above a few more pics for chamfers Speculation.
teohache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 September 2015, 02:20 AM   #44
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2JHead View Post
I love the watch and it is certainly better than my red sub, but unpolished...gonna have to agree with Springer here.

It has evidence of service as it has a servie or possibly aftermarket crystal.

It has an inconsistency in the 11 o'clock lug chamfer that looks non-factory.

The CG's look polished (although not alot)

Don't wanna talk down the watch but well it is a discussion forum.
Perhaps there should be two categories included in the description of a vintage case: "Unpolished" and/or "Not refinished." There's a difference. A watch's lugs (tops and chamfers) can be restored and refreshed, without the case sides being polished. If the case sides have not been polished but the chamfers have been re-cut, you could still argue that the case has not been "polished," which implies the sides of the case. I'd say, just from the photos, that it looks as if the lugs have been refinished but the sides of the case look as if they could be untouched. Hard to say for sure, of course.

Either way, beautiful red Sub!!
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 September 2015, 03:07 AM   #45
Storky
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Watch: Rolex 1680
Posts: 382
Beautiful Red! Great case & patina.
If it has had a sympathetic refinish ... so what?!
From experience there is a huge difference between a light refinish/refresh and a bodge polish job. The watches are essentially tool watches that got a hard time, so to find one that has a great case like this is a result! Most of them get a few 'dings' that are easy to remove without any noticeable reduction of lug thickness etc, but I've seen cases that have obviously had marks filed out then been shoved hard against a coarse polishing mop for half an hour, this rounds everything off, burns your fingers and 'pulls out' the case holes... yuk! (The wrong way to do it)
... and I know for a fact that AD's (lightly) refinish NEW stock sometimes, as watches on display get knocked against each other.

There... I've had my say!
__________________
Instagram: _Storky
All my own photos & a few video clips
Storky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 September 2015, 03:22 AM   #46
Michael M.
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
Congrats on a fantastic 1680. Andrew is the best!

Case looks unpolished to me..
Michael M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 September 2015, 03:26 AM   #47
subx
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: usa
Posts: 523
beautiful 1680 with thick case,

will not throw fire on the refinish / non refinish debate :)
subx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 September 2015, 03:48 AM   #48
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
Refinished or not, that's a beautiful watch. Congrats!
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 September 2015, 03:54 AM   #49
azguy
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
That's hardcore patine
azguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 September 2015, 05:04 AM   #50
Loevhagen
"TRF" Member
 
Loevhagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,906
Nice sub. :)

BTW: Chamfers and how they look can vary from that time, since they were made by hand and thus not exactly alike.
Loevhagen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 September 2015, 05:12 AM   #51
Storky
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Watch: Rolex 1680
Posts: 382
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loevhagen View Post
Nice sub. :)

BTW: Chamfers and how they look can vary from that time, since they were made by hand and thus not exactly alike.
X2
__________________
Instagram: _Storky
All my own photos & a few video clips
Storky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 September 2015, 06:44 AM   #52
Zoran
"TRF" Member
 
Zoran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Zoran
Location: EU
Watch: 1655 Mark 1
Posts: 1,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Crusher View Post
Refinished or not, that's a beautiful watch. Congrats!
I agree! She's a real beauty and I am sure you will get a lot of pleasure from wearing that watch!

Congratulations!
__________________
Zoran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 September 2015, 08:23 AM   #53
willang
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoran View Post
I agree! She's a real beauty and I am sure you will get a lot of pleasure from wearing that watch!

Congratulations!
X3.

__________________
Instagram: _willang
willang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 September 2015, 02:12 PM   #54
thejerseyrock
"TRF" Member
 
thejerseyrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Tom
Location: New Jersey
Watch: Rolex, Omega, AP
Posts: 991
Thats a real beauty! X4
thejerseyrock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 September 2015, 02:39 PM   #55
greekbum
"TRF" Member
 
greekbum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Nikos
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex GMT 16750
Posts: 8,415
Thats a stunning watch you got :) Its one of the nicest red subs I have seen in a while. It almost looks never worn and without a scratch. The crown was updated to a trip lock at some time during service also :)
__________________
Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas

Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting
greekbum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 September 2015, 04:00 PM   #56
jedly1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: mel(oz)/Yorks(uk)
Posts: 1,917
with the greatest of respect , (and remember I'm the first in the queue to say all this 'unpolished'' nonsense is just that) , there is nothing in those pictures that would allow anyone to say definitively that the watch has or hasn't been polished. from photos only it could well be unpolished, equally it could have had a light polish, no one is claiming NOS as far as i can tell.

it appears good enough that without holding it in my hand, and looking at it properly down the case sides in 3dimension i wouldn't want, or be able to state a DEFINITIVE opinion and I'm amazed anyone else feels they can.

HOWEVER ..

......if Andrew, who has more experienced than most of the people on this board added together, HAS held it in his hand , HAS inspected in person , and HAS put his name to it as unpolished then i have zero problem accepting that and personally i find pissing on someone elses excitement more than a bit rude.

as for the glass.... depends what a customer wants , if waterproof is the requirement it would be swapped,

as for the crown , depends on the serial a bit , but 3 dots is no problem if its no o ring early crown and tube, but equally if someone has wanted waterproof along the way they its no big deal either.


nice watch , congrats, i hope it brings you a lot of pleasure for years to come.
jedly1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 September 2015, 04:51 PM   #57
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent65 View Post
Blah blah babbling bollox yourself, 'Mr. Time To Go'
1. NO PERSONAL ATTACKS OR INAPPROPRIATE LANGUAGE (and WE MEAN IT).

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=8936

Bear this in mind, please.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2015, 08:50 AM   #58
stmoore
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: US
Watch: Gilt
Posts: 1,592
Wonderful red sub. You did very well and should be proud of your watch. Even the insert is proper vintage! Buying from Andrew is a smart move. As Jed said, if Andrew endorses the watch then that's all I need to know.
stmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2015, 09:01 AM   #59
themaninblack
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent65 View Post
Some people just don't want to accept the apparently unthinkable possibility that a watch hasn't been polished before! Haha. There are some owners who simply either didn't wear their watch much, or never had it serviced. Just did nothing - for decades. It does happen. Basic law of probability; millions made and sold, not all were worn heavily or serviced multiple times. Some... never. Making absolute statements about something someone has never owned, held or even seen in person is a bit silly. IMHO...
True, this watch has possibly been polished and possibly not but any watch that goes to a RSC for service gets polished unless the owner expressly instructs them not to.
themaninblack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2015, 12:28 PM   #60
Dries
"TRF" Member
 
Dries's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,612
Congrats! That's a stunner
Dries is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.