ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 September 2015, 04:17 PM | #31 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Western Europe
Posts: 609
|
Quote:
It has evidence of service as it has a servie or possibly aftermarket crystal. It has an inconsistency in the 11 o'clock lug chamfer that looks non-factory. The CG's look polished (although not alot) Don't wanna talk down the watch but well it is a discussion forum. |
|
7 September 2015, 04:58 PM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,293
|
Quote:
So now it's 'possibly' an 'after-market crystal' as well?! Maybe something else is amiss as well? Regardless, almost anyone can change a crystal (even me) - doesn't necessarily mean it's been to a RSC, been serviced by anyone at all, or been polished. This one may have been serviced independently; and we are all speculating here (except, perhaps, the new owner/seller/previous owner who may know things no-one else does about the history of the watch, and it has therefore been stated that it's unpolished). My MKIV 1680 is unpolished, and the dealer had a new crystal put on it at my request, although I saw it first with the original one installed and that was also supplied with the watch. Still got the old, beaten-up original. Didn't go to RSC to have genuine Rolex crystal installed. Wasn't polished either. As for 'non-factory inconsistencies' - again that is subjective, and there's been plenty of discussions and photographic evidence (NOS examples, and even Rolex catalogue photos) where lugs and CGs are not precisely symmetrical. Edit: and by the way, I see no inconsistency on the 11'oclock lug chamfer, or anywhere else on this case. Please point out what you mean.
__________________
|
|
7 September 2015, 06:47 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: SeB
Location: Germany
Watch: MaD_aT_gMt
Posts: 1,219
|
Huge congrats!!!! Fantastic RedSub
|
7 September 2015, 06:53 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: George
Location: Sydney
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,104
|
Beauty, congrats
|
7 September 2015, 08:52 PM | #35 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,586
|
Quote:
How can you say people are not willing to accept the "unthinkable" or basic law of probability...Bla, bla, bla.. Of course there are unpolished watches out there! The pictures are clear and indeed a very nice watch but the chamfers are not original. So then, Mr. Vincen65, my question to you is - Do you think this case is "unpolished"...that this case was not refreshed? |
|
7 September 2015, 09:08 PM | #36 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,293
|
Quote:
How can you say you know it's been polished? Did you polish it?
__________________
|
|
7 September 2015, 09:21 PM | #37 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,586
|
|
7 September 2015, 09:23 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,293
|
Likewise
You didn't answer mine. And, for the record, Mr. Vincent65 doesn't think it's been polished. Now you answer my question, wise-guy.
__________________
|
7 September 2015, 09:27 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 6,010
|
lovely watch, congratulations! Andrew Shear always has the best examples..
|
7 September 2015, 09:36 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Justin
Location: Pa
Watch: Explorer ii
Posts: 3,150
|
Stunning...
Back to eating popcorn |
7 September 2015, 10:47 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Tom T
Location: Illinois
Watch: 1680, 214270, BLNR
Posts: 168
|
I would be proud to own that one.
|
8 September 2015, 12:41 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: dominican republi
Posts: 10
|
service crystal
OHH yes it has one service one the firts pics, and know a Superdome change in less then 10 minute, and original top hat of the watch on the house. Always gonna be diferent thinking but i know what i get and from who i acquired.
|
8 September 2015, 01:41 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: dominican republi
Posts: 10
|
By the way
Agree with Vincent, only 3 people knows for sure, ( past owner ( came from a family), Dealer ( Andrew Shear) and owner ( me ). above a few more pics for chamfers Speculation.
|
8 September 2015, 02:20 AM | #44 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,789
|
Quote:
Either way, beautiful red Sub!! |
|
8 September 2015, 03:07 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Watch: Rolex 1680
Posts: 382
|
Beautiful Red! Great case & patina.
If it has had a sympathetic refinish ... so what?! From experience there is a huge difference between a light refinish/refresh and a bodge polish job. The watches are essentially tool watches that got a hard time, so to find one that has a great case like this is a result! Most of them get a few 'dings' that are easy to remove without any noticeable reduction of lug thickness etc, but I've seen cases that have obviously had marks filed out then been shoved hard against a coarse polishing mop for half an hour, this rounds everything off, burns your fingers and 'pulls out' the case holes... yuk! (The wrong way to do it) ... and I know for a fact that AD's (lightly) refinish NEW stock sometimes, as watches on display get knocked against each other. There... I've had my say! |
8 September 2015, 03:22 AM | #46 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
|
Congrats on a fantastic 1680. Andrew is the best!
Case looks unpolished to me.. |
8 September 2015, 03:26 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: usa
Posts: 523
|
beautiful 1680 with thick case,
will not throw fire on the refinish / non refinish debate :) |
8 September 2015, 03:48 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
|
Refinished or not, that's a beautiful watch. Congrats!
|
8 September 2015, 03:54 AM | #49 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
That's hardcore patine
|
8 September 2015, 05:04 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,906
|
Nice sub. :)
BTW: Chamfers and how they look can vary from that time, since they were made by hand and thus not exactly alike. |
8 September 2015, 05:12 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Watch: Rolex 1680
Posts: 382
|
X2
|
8 September 2015, 06:44 AM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Zoran
Location: EU
Watch: 1655 Mark 1
Posts: 1,010
|
I agree! She's a real beauty and I am sure you will get a lot of pleasure from wearing that watch!
Congratulations!
__________________
|
8 September 2015, 08:23 AM | #53 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 489
|
Quote:
__________________
Instagram: _willang |
|
8 September 2015, 02:12 PM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Tom
Location: New Jersey
Watch: Rolex, Omega, AP
Posts: 991
|
Thats a real beauty! X4
|
8 September 2015, 02:39 PM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Nikos
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex GMT 16750
Posts: 8,415
|
Thats a stunning watch you got :) Its one of the nicest red subs I have seen in a while. It almost looks never worn and without a scratch. The crown was updated to a trip lock at some time during service also :)
__________________
Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting |
8 September 2015, 04:00 PM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: mel(oz)/Yorks(uk)
Posts: 1,917
|
with the greatest of respect , (and remember I'm the first in the queue to say all this 'unpolished'' nonsense is just that) , there is nothing in those pictures that would allow anyone to say definitively that the watch has or hasn't been polished. from photos only it could well be unpolished, equally it could have had a light polish, no one is claiming NOS as far as i can tell.
it appears good enough that without holding it in my hand, and looking at it properly down the case sides in 3dimension i wouldn't want, or be able to state a DEFINITIVE opinion and I'm amazed anyone else feels they can. HOWEVER .. ......if Andrew, who has more experienced than most of the people on this board added together, HAS held it in his hand , HAS inspected in person , and HAS put his name to it as unpolished then i have zero problem accepting that and personally i find pissing on someone elses excitement more than a bit rude. as for the glass.... depends what a customer wants , if waterproof is the requirement it would be swapped, as for the crown , depends on the serial a bit , but 3 dots is no problem if its no o ring early crown and tube, but equally if someone has wanted waterproof along the way they its no big deal either. nice watch , congrats, i hope it brings you a lot of pleasure for years to come. |
8 September 2015, 04:51 PM | #57 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,356
|
1. NO PERSONAL ATTACKS OR INAPPROPRIATE LANGUAGE (and WE MEAN IT).
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=8936 Bear this in mind, please. |
12 September 2015, 08:50 AM | #58 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: US
Watch: Gilt
Posts: 1,592
|
Wonderful red sub. You did very well and should be proud of your watch. Even the insert is proper vintage! Buying from Andrew is a smart move. As Jed said, if Andrew endorses the watch then that's all I need to know.
|
12 September 2015, 09:01 AM | #59 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,058
|
Quote:
|
|
12 September 2015, 12:28 PM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,612
|
Congrats! That's a stunner
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.