ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 November 2020, 09:03 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: USA
Watch: AP 15400ST
Posts: 175
|
Would you trade a full set 2020 Explorer 214270 for a 1996 Coke GMT?
TRF- I'd like to ask your opinion: Would you trade a 2020 Explorer 214270 (full set) for a 1996 GMT 16710 on a jubilee (no box or papers)? I love the Explorer but sometimes feel the dial and case are too large. I may be overthinking it. I'd need to add cash to the trade as well. Thoughts? Am I crazy for considering this??
|
7 November 2020, 09:10 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: East
Watch: AP + PP + Rolex
Posts: 1,775
|
I wouldn't trade a modern/new watch for an old watch from 1996. There are huge differences in manufacturing quality, if I need to be frank, and I couldn't nor wouldn't go backwards that far.
__________________
|
7 November 2020, 09:10 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: USA/Denmark
Posts: 651
|
I wouldn't do that trade because i like full sets. There are a ton of 16710s out there with box and papers. You are not crazy for considering it, but let's keep looking for another 16710.
|
7 November 2020, 09:12 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 647
|
No way. The Coke was never on a jubilee so it is not an original.
|
7 November 2020, 09:15 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 1,276
|
No don't do it. Find a better 16710.
|
7 November 2020, 09:16 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 6,478
|
No, definitely not.
|
7 November 2020, 09:48 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Hillside
Posts: 312
|
Absolutely no way
|
7 November 2020, 10:30 AM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Casio F91W
Posts: 910
|
Yes. I think the 42mm explorer is too big and trendy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
|
7 November 2020, 10:32 AM | #9 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Casio F91W
Posts: 910
|
Quote:
Wasn't it possible to request a jubilee with an AD? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
|
|
7 November 2020, 11:17 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Maryland
Watch: GMT Mast II 116713
Posts: 200
|
Not in a million years!
|
7 November 2020, 12:42 PM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 24,603
|
Don’t like proportions of 214270 so yes would do the trade
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 2230.50.00 Zenith 02.470.405 Henry Archer Eclipse 2FA security enabled |
7 November 2020, 12:57 PM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Michigan
Watch: Air King
Posts: 1,111
|
Wrong watch. The 214270 is the 39mm. But I can agree with your sentiments, even though I own and like both the 40mm and the 42mm Explorer II.
As far as that trade, heck no! I love the 39mm Explorer too much to ever part with it! |
7 November 2020, 01:00 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: C Vo
Location: Georgia
Watch: 117610LN 116610LN
Posts: 1,012
|
Keep the Explorer - wait for the next Coke. It has to be coming soon.
|
7 November 2020, 03:32 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,032
|
Nope
|
7 November 2020, 03:39 PM | #15 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 61,288
|
Another no!
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
7 November 2020, 03:51 PM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: USA
Watch: AP 15400ST
Posts: 175
|
I’m sensing you guys don’t like the trade... Thank you! I’m definitely keeping the Explorer
|
7 November 2020, 03:52 PM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: USA
Watch: AP 15400ST
Posts: 175
|
|
7 November 2020, 03:59 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,759
|
Yes I would definitely trade. Yes it was a option to come with a jubilee. The 16710 is an icon that they are not making any more of. The box/papers wouldn’t bother me a bit.
|
7 November 2020, 04:01 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Parent's basement
Posts: 247
|
I have a coke and I would say no. Only because i think 1996 is a little too old. the sweet spot for 16710s is 2000s onwards. Also no box and papers is a problem for me.
|
7 November 2020, 05:28 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dayona
Posts: 1,894
|
|
7 November 2020, 05:52 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: BondJamesBond
Location: The Algarve
Watch: Rolex or nothing
Posts: 3,921
|
I would trade a 6-digit for 5-digit every day.
__________________
♛ 5-digit Rolex or nothing ♛ 16030, 16613, 16713, 18038. |
7 November 2020, 06:29 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Uk
Watch: RolexGMT/Tudor7928
Posts: 2,647
|
I’d say yes but I’m slightly biased I love my coke gmt
|
7 November 2020, 06:46 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Finland
Posts: 343
|
How about no?
__________________
👑 116400GV 🛡️ 25600TN 🇬 GWM5610 |
7 November 2020, 09:16 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,421
|
I would being I prefer 5 digit models over 6 digit but I would pass on the one you are looking at & go for a sharp full set. And yes they were offered as a jubilee option as well. I would also search for a 2000 model and up w the upgraded SEL and better lume.
__________________
126710BLRO-0001 / 116610LV / 116613LB / Silver Snoopy / PAM24 / PAM111 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.