ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 January 2021, 12:21 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: New York
Posts: 58
|
Seconds hand. Centered or on sub-dial.
I realize that a lot of watches have the second hand in a subdial, especially chronographs that require the one-second timing hand to start and stop with a button. But for simple chronometers that feature this, I don’t understand the reasoning behind it.
Am I missing something? |
19 January 2021, 12:48 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: swmnpoolsmovie*
Posts: 9,094
|
Not absolutely sure of the question but here goes....
The large second hand in a chronograph is obviously for more accurate stop watch use just because it's visually larger. Much like the "doctors watch" dial that used a large second hand, that was designed so a Dr could check patient heart rate more easily than looking at a tiny subdial. As for an ordinary dial of a watch and whether it should be a subdial second hand or not, is probably just a design element of the watch design. And don't forget that a lot of watch companies used ETA ( and other company's movements) that they bought for their watches and some movements had the subdial and some didn't and they could chose which one was preferable for their case and aesthetics. But overall I guess a subdial is merely a design element of the watch, which in most cases I actually prefer. A movement guy could probably chime in and give a better answer about how a movement is put together and how much room etc, it takes up.
__________________
OlllllllO |
19 January 2021, 12:57 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: England.
Watch: Various
Posts: 7,305
|
For me it is the looks, it's what drew me to my watch, others prefer the larger second hand, I prefer the sub dial.
__________________
KINDEST REGARDS DAVE |
19 January 2021, 01:01 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,248
|
Dave, I was checking out that watch last week, awfully tempting if I were not waiting for the Explorer, and also now thinking about the new Speedmaster. It's a stunner.
|
19 January 2021, 02:11 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,510
|
Quote:
Love it, sir! I’ve always liked pocket watches and capturing their look in modern pieces with a subdial is nice. I think JLC hit it out of the park with your piece, on so many levels. The topic makes me think about our relationship with time, compared to people in the past. We care about seconds. The past (pocket watch era), not so much. Well, the railroad comes to mind as an exception. That being said, maybe that’s why seconds is not a central element. One can glance down and see the watch is still running. Again, I don’t know for sure, just speculation. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
19 January 2021, 03:59 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: New York
Posts: 58
|
To me, having the seconds displayed in a subdial seems to treat the seconds function as an afterthought. To me, it makes much more sense to keep the timekeeping hands concentric, as they are all keeping track of the same time.
|
19 January 2021, 04:20 AM | #7 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,049
|
Quote:
Older clocks don't have seconds hands, or if they did, they were run off the direct drive gear-set and then made a sub-dial, rather than have more hand-posts sticking through the center. So, a sub-dial seconds hand is a historically accurate dial depiction, and a style that comes and goes. Then, in 1945, somebody actually put a date on the dial of a wristwatch too- Oh, the horror of it all - this I just don't understand the reasoning behind.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
19 January 2021, 04:20 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Seattle
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
https://www.watch-wiki.net/index.php...econds#History |
|
19 January 2021, 07:48 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,899
|
The seconds sub-dial is actually a hand attached directly to the forth wheel of the geartrain--that's the gear which takes 1 minute to make a complete rotation, of course.
It's more efficient to have a sub-seconds and it takes a few extra gears for a central seconds, but not a big deal in modern watchmaking. |
19 January 2021, 08:56 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Brad
Location: Purdue
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 9,084
|
Sub dial on dress watches for sure.
__________________
♛ ✠ Ω 2FA Active |
19 January 2021, 08:26 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: USA
Watch: N/A
Posts: 457
|
I prefer sub-dial seconds on dress watches and center seconds on sportier watches. Either way, a second hand is nearly a must-have for me. Also, stunning JLC posted above.
|
19 January 2021, 09:53 PM | #12 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 44,749
|
I like both options on a second hand. I do like to see it move.
|
19 January 2021, 09:56 PM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,696
|
Depends on the watch, but overall I prefer the center second hands vs a sub dial.
|
19 January 2021, 11:13 PM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,042
|
The 15202, now that one I don’t understand
|
20 January 2021, 12:54 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Real Name: Jake
Location: USA
Watch: VCO
Posts: 785
|
I really have no strong preference one way or the other, completely dependent on the watch itself and how it is executed.
|
21 January 2021, 03:13 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,623
|
#metoo
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT |
21 January 2021, 04:17 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,864
|
I like small seconds
__________________
|
21 January 2021, 11:32 PM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: England.
Watch: Various
Posts: 7,305
|
Quote:
__________________
KINDEST REGARDS DAVE |
|
21 January 2021, 11:57 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,031
|
|
22 January 2021, 01:23 AM | #20 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,864
|
Quote:
Indeed it is. It’s sapphire. Off to Geneva. Supposedly expedited. Will post to Journe thread when it returns.
__________________
|
|
22 January 2021, 10:26 AM | #21 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 6,188
|
A small seconds register, when executed well, just adds so much character to the watch. This is by far the favorite in my collection. Hard to capture all the different subtle hues and details as they change with the angle of the light.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.