ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

toneafficianado · 13 November 2017, 06:39 AM

I have to agree with Larry that the Bluesy is the most beautiful watch and I'm a guy who had a Bluesy C and sold it!
I've worn an SD4K for half an hour and it is tall! Much the same weight as Bluesy C though.
Thing is..you've always posted about loving your Bluesy.
Both is therefore the only way to go..both or stay with the LB.
That sunburst dial just comes alive in sunlight!

Bigblu10 · 13 November 2017, 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by superstarmar

I’m going to try it on soon .... all the other SS sports models I’ve
Tried on so far seemed a little boring to me ... We shall see ...

I believe after a few months of the SD you will get bored with this one. Yes it is black and a neutral color, but the TT Blue goes with everything from casual to business dress. And the blue dial with gold script? Iconic and beautiful!

Mick8moses · 13 November 2017, 07:06 AM

SD would be my choice

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

superstarmar · 13 November 2017, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bigblu10

I believe after a few months of the SD you will get bored with this one. Yes it is black and a neutral color, but the TT Blue goes with everything from casual to business dress. And the blue dial with gold script? Iconic and beautiful!

Yes , I see your point ... every now and then we all
itch for something new but this one isn’t blue !!!

nikesupremedunk · 13 November 2017, 12:03 PM

I would also choose the LB. I understand wanting to try out something new but honestly the SD4K was a disappointment. The flat dial and the thickness made it less desirable than the sub to me, but those are also characteristics that SD fans like. I would strongly recommend trying one on before buying.

nakedtoes · 13 November 2017, 12:42 PM

Yes the bluessy anytime.. No brand like Rolex can do Blue and 2 tones so beautifully. The blue sunburst dial and blue ceramic bezel with the solid gold center links are a Royal combo. Its the only watch that i receive the most compliments. However if value is concern then the SD4000 since it is already discontinued. Goes with yr heart... I would grab the Bluessy without hesitation..

AK797 · 13 November 2017, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by superstarmar

Thanks Larry for your input.... I appreciate it !!!!
The bluesy is very special and it is my favorite sports Rolex
save the full YG like you mentioned...

I guess I’m entertaining it cause it’s discontinued and it does
Look sharp ...

STC. Stay the course, Mario, thank me later.

Therolexlogin · 13 November 2017, 01:32 PM

I personally would go for the bluesy. I almost got one myself but I hear next year might be a big year for the Submariners so I'ma wait.

rebel_1 · 13 November 2017, 02:20 PM

To be honest, getting rid of my TT smurf was one of my biggest mistakes. I should probably pick another one up. The SDC does nothing for me. I’d go with the bluesy.

swils8610 · 13 November 2017, 02:45 PM

Having owned and loved both I would go with the SD4k. IMHO it’s the best owning one Rolex to have.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

yannis · 13 November 2017, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by superstarmar

Yes , I see your point ... every now and then we all
itch for something new but this one isn’t blue !!!

Mario what is your current line up?

HogwldFLTR · 13 November 2017, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by superstarmar

I actually wanted a SD 43 but had to be on “ The List “...
So with the SD 4K being phased out I thought it was
worth looking at...

Phased out, hell it's been terminated!!! If you want a watch that is more eye catching then the blue is the way to go. The SD is much stealthier.

Pmt2 · 13 November 2017, 03:47 PM

The Sd4000 could very well be one of the most perfectly made Rolex’s ever! IMO It looks like a vintage/modern classic! It will become extremely hard to purchase as time goes by, so I would go with the sea dweller. It’s pure class. The bluesy is a beautiful watch to add later. There’s millions of them out there so don’t worry.

superstarmar · 13 November 2017, 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yannis

Mario what is your current line up?

Trimmed my collection down to one Rolex ( Bluesy )
and a steinhart/debaufre ss gmt black dial and bezel ...

kwingy · 13 November 2017, 08:42 PM

I would keep the Bluesey - I think its a lovely watch but the SD4k which I had as well is the perfect everyday watch - it's just a little boring thats all after a while.

superstarmar · 13 November 2017, 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AK797

STC. Stay the course, Mario, thank me later.

Ahhhh.... the beauty .... that’s like the perfect shot Neil !!!!

yannis · 13 November 2017, 10:37 PM

I own none of the above but i would keep the 116613 and add the 116600 if i was you Mario. If the choice was between the 16613 (the real bluesy as per the legend JJ) and 116600 i would opt for the latter.

superstarmar · 15 November 2017, 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yannis

I own none of the above but i would keep the 116613 and add the 116600 if i was you Mario. If the choice was between the 16613 (the real bluesy as per the legend JJ) and 116600 i would opt for the latter.

Yes I currently have the 116613 LB Ceramic Sunburst Dial...

HogwldFLTR · 15 November 2017, 02:07 PM

Well, the question to me is whether or not the 116600 is actually worth having as a collectible Rolex due to its replacement by the SD43 and if that is important to you?

Aside from that, personally I like having something flashy to be able to wear on occasion. For me the SkyD in blue is the trick. It seems to be a crowd-pleaser for the non WIS contingent. Would I be happy with it as my only; I'm not certain but I'd likely tire of its sparkling nature. Would I get bored with the 116600 as an only; I might get bored but I'm certain I could live with the problem.

Egelber · 15 November 2017, 03:20 PM

I hate to do this to you, but just buy the HULK

superstarmar · 15 November 2017, 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Egelber

I hate to do this to you, but just buy the HULK

dave023 · 16 November 2017, 12:51 AM

Sd4k

Jimbogigolo · 16 November 2017, 01:04 AM

Blusey straight up

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Wrist Watcher · 16 November 2017, 01:31 AM

I owned the 116600 briefly and the old bluesy 16613 and have tried on the new bluesy 113313, and I would definitely go with the 116613. I love the blue dial and the way it wears more than the thicker SD. I also like the cleaner bezel of the Subs. Both are super nice though.

Sublovin · 16 November 2017, 01:34 AM

A lot of instructions!
I much prefer the sd , however, you stated that the TT sub is your all-time favorite. If that's the case, why would you even be questioning it? Get what you like

lecorsaire · 16 November 2017, 01:49 AM

The Bluesy is nice but once you put a 16618 or a 116618 on wrist, you will be craving the gold Sub. I honestly love both and would have a hard time deciding. The 5 digit has the classic Sub design but it's bracelet isn't as substantial as the 6 digit ceramic but it is available for $5-8k less on average than a 6 digit and no more will ever be produced. There are several things to look out for. The date wheel font (open 9) on earlier ones, tritium vs. superluminova, holes vs. no holes case, engraved rehaut vs not engraved and I'm sure there are more differences over the production. It's all personal preference but of course if you can find one for a great price, all that stuff doesn't really matter.

With the 116618s all you have to look out for are the matte vs. sunburst dials. Some feel like the matte blue matches the ceramic color better while others don't care and prefer the classic blue dial that makes everyone go crazy over this watch.

lecorsaire · 16 November 2017, 01:55 AM

As for TT I would probably go ceramic. The bracelet is a huge improvement and why they command the premium over the 5 digits. I personally don't like the older 16613s with the SS clasp. It interrupts the design and looks dated imo. This changed in 2000? I believe in 2000 there were still some SS clasp 16613s produced so 2000 is not really definitive. Most on this forum are aware of all the changes but I've seen sellers charging the same price for a SS clasp model as a full gold center link one and the latter one is obviously more valuable.

VladimirS · 16 November 2017, 04:57 AM

The 116600 is the one that got away for me (will only buy new and From AD so the ship has sailed). So that would be the way I went in the first instance (if they were still being produced). But I’d have ended up with both at some point.

superstarmar · 16 November 2017, 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VladimirS

The 116600 is the one that got away for me (will only buy new and From AD so the ship has sailed). So that would be the way I went in the first instance (if they were still being produced). But I’d have ended up with both at some point.

What if a TRF member had one BNIB ?
Stickers on and not sized ?
You wouldn’t be interested?

willy23 · 16 November 2017, 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR

cool

13 November 2017, 12:03 PM	#35
nikesupremedunk "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2016 Real Name: Andrew Location: NYC Posts: 1,227	I would also choose the LB. I understand wanting to try out something new but honestly the SD4K was a disappointment. The flat dial and the thickness made it less desirable than the sub to me, but those are also characteristics that SD fans like. I would strongly recommend trying one on before buying. __________________ \| 116234 DJ36 \| 116610LN SubC \| 116520 Daytona \| BlackBay 58 Blue \|

13 November 2017, 02:20 PM	#39
rebel_1 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: Florida Posts: 2,132	To be honest, getting rid of my TT smurf was one of my biggest mistakes. I should probably pick another one up. The SDC does nothing for me. I’d go with the bluesy. __________________ Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017

13 November 2017, 10:37 PM	#47
yannis "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Real Name: Yannis Location: Europe Watch: maniac Posts: 9,070	I own none of the above but i would keep the 116613 and add the 116600 if i was you Mario. If the choice was between the 16613 (the real bluesy as per the legend JJ) and 116600 i would opt for the latter. __________________ Rolex Submariner 116610LV \| Tudor 79220N DSSD MEMBERS - OWNERS CLUB

15 November 2017, 02:07 PM	#49
HogwldFLTR 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Lee Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48 Watch: What's on my wrist Posts: 33,256	Well, the question to me is whether or not the 116600 is actually worth having as a collectible Rolex due to its replacement by the SD43 and if that is important to you? Aside from that, personally I like having something flashy to be able to wear on occasion. For me the SkyD in blue is the trick. It seems to be a crowd-pleaser for the non WIS contingent. Would I be happy with it as my only; I'm not certain but I'd likely tire of its sparkling nature. Would I get bored with the 116600 as an only; I might get bored but I'm certain I could live with the problem. __________________ Troglodyte in residence! https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599

16 November 2017, 01:31 AM	#54
Wrist Watcher 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: USA Watch: Hulk 116610LV Posts: 1,443	I owned the 116600 briefly and the old bluesy 16613 and have tried on the new bluesy 113313, and I would definitely go with the 116613. I love the blue dial and the way it wears more than the thicker SD. I also like the cleaner bezel of the Subs. Both are super nice though. __________________ Rolex Submariner 116610LV (Hulk) Rolex GMT Master II 126710BLRO (Pepsi) Rolex Daytona 116500LN (White)

13 November 2017, 06:39 AM	#31
toneafficianado 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Alan Location: Australia Posts: 2,201	I have to agree with Larry that the Bluesy is the most beautiful watch and I'm a guy who had a Bluesy C and sold it! I've worn an SD4K for half an hour and it is tall! Much the same weight as Bluesy C though. Thing is..you've always posted about loving your Bluesy. Both is therefore the only way to go..both or stay with the LB. That sunburst dial just comes alive in sunlight!

13 November 2017, 07:06 AM	#33
Mick8moses Banned Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Mick Location: Atlanta Posts: 1,524	SD would be my choice Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

13 November 2017, 12:42 PM	#36
nakedtoes "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: singapore Posts: 122	Yes the bluessy anytime.. No brand like Rolex can do Blue and 2 tones so beautifully. The blue sunburst dial and blue ceramic bezel with the solid gold center links are a Royal combo. Its the only watch that i receive the most compliments. However if value is concern then the SD4000 since it is already discontinued. Goes with yr heart... I would grab the Bluessy without hesitation..

13 November 2017, 01:32 PM	#38
Therolexlogin "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2017 Real Name: Andy Location: Vancouver, Canada Watch: GMT Master II BLNR Posts: 79	I personally would go for the bluesy. I almost got one myself but I hear next year might be a big year for the Submariners so I'ma wait.

13 November 2017, 02:45 PM	#40
swils8610 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Real Name: shannon Location: usa Posts: 8,997	Having owned and loved both I would go with the SD4k. IMHO it’s the best owning one Rolex to have. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

13 November 2017, 03:47 PM	#43
Pmt2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: USA Posts: 1,145	The Sd4000 could very well be one of the most perfectly made Rolex’s ever! IMO It looks like a vintage/modern classic! It will become extremely hard to purchase as time goes by, so I would go with the sea dweller. It’s pure class. The bluesy is a beautiful watch to add later. There’s millions of them out there so don’t worry.

13 November 2017, 08:42 PM	#45
kwingy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: UK Posts: 1,276	I would keep the Bluesey - I think its a lovely watch but the SD4k which I had as well is the perfect everyday watch - it's just a little boring thats all after a while.

15 November 2017, 03:20 PM	#50
Egelber "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Elliott Location: Prosper, Texas Watch: Sub 114060 2019 Posts: 410	I hate to do this to you, but just buy the HULK

16 November 2017, 12:51 AM	#52
dave023 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2016 Real Name: David Location: Home Watch: Classics Posts: 773	Sd4k

16 November 2017, 01:04 AM	#53
Jimbogigolo "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Real Name: Jim Location: NJ Watch: Rolex Daytona W&B Posts: 1,527	Blusey straight up Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

16 November 2017, 01:34 AM	#55
Sublovin "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: USA Watch: Lots Posts: 4,381	A lot of instructions! I much prefer the sd , however, you stated that the TT sub is your all-time favorite. If that's the case, why would you even be questioning it? Get what you like

16 November 2017, 01:49 AM	#56
lecorsaire "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: NYC Watch: 116710BLNR Posts: 1,541	The Bluesy is nice but once you put a 16618 or a 116618 on wrist, you will be craving the gold Sub. I honestly love both and would have a hard time deciding. The 5 digit has the classic Sub design but it's bracelet isn't as substantial as the 6 digit ceramic but it is available for $5-8k less on average than a 6 digit and no more will ever be produced. There are several things to look out for. The date wheel font (open 9) on earlier ones, tritium vs. superluminova, holes vs. no holes case, engraved rehaut vs not engraved and I'm sure there are more differences over the production. It's all personal preference but of course if you can find one for a great price, all that stuff doesn't really matter. With the 116618s all you have to look out for are the matte vs. sunburst dials. Some feel like the matte blue matches the ceramic color better while others don't care and prefer the classic blue dial that makes everyone go crazy over this watch. __________________ Rolex 116710 BLNR Rolex Day Date 118238 Champagne/Batons

16 November 2017, 01:55 AM	#57
lecorsaire "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: NYC Watch: 116710BLNR Posts: 1,541	As for TT I would probably go ceramic. The bracelet is a huge improvement and why they command the premium over the 5 digits. I personally don't like the older 16613s with the SS clasp. It interrupts the design and looks dated imo. This changed in 2000? I believe in 2000 there were still some SS clasp 16613s produced so 2000 is not really definitive. Most on this forum are aware of all the changes but I've seen sellers charging the same price for a SS clasp model as a full gold center link one and the latter one is obviously more valuable. __________________ Rolex 116710 BLNR Rolex Day Date 118238 Champagne/Batons

16 November 2017, 04:57 AM	#58
VladimirS "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: Chester Posts: 74	The 116600 is the one that got away for me (will only buy new and From AD so the ship has sailed). So that would be the way I went in the first instance (if they were still being produced). But I’d have ended up with both at some point.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)