ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 May 2014, 12:48 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 13
|
Explorer 36 vs 39: Which Looks Sportier?
May be splitting hairs here but which Explorer (1/14270 or 214270) do you think looks sportier (however you define sporty)? And why?
[Photo courtesy of Georgio1962 from r-l-x.de] Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk - now Free |
7 May 2014, 01:54 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,125
|
The term "sporty" to me evokes a feeling of a watch that is a little bigger, a little bolder, perhaps with a little more wrist presence. I would say that the 214270 is sportier, while the 114270 is more classically styled and a bit more elegant.
They are both beautiful...I chose the "sportier" 214270 and I am thrilled with it:)
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
7 May 2014, 02:00 PM | #3 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,362
|
39 is sportier, 36 is classier, IMO.
|
7 May 2014, 02:03 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
|
I like both but prefer the 36.
|
7 May 2014, 02:03 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: North Carolina
Watch: DD 118206
Posts: 1,857
|
I would say 36 is classier and sportier. I would might also consider "sportier" as meaning less cumbersome, more agile, not in the way while being active.
|
7 May 2014, 02:07 PM | #6 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,362
|
I know what you mean, but for me the 'Sports' in Rolex terms is more about Sports Cars and Sports Jackets than physical sports. Does that make sense?
|
7 May 2014, 02:07 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 13
|
Really cool picture there...
Quote:
|
|
7 May 2014, 02:09 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Brad
Location: Colorado
Watch: 16613
Posts: 1,255
|
36
|
7 May 2014, 02:09 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Patrick
Location: SIN
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 5,066
|
For myself, 39mm is sportier, improved bracelet gives it a chunkier feel.
|
7 May 2014, 02:17 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
|
The 36mm looks slightly more proportionate, but the 39mm is sportier. It is larger (something that I associate with being sporty), and has an upgraded bracelet and clasp. Between the two, I would choose the 39mm any day of the week.
|
7 May 2014, 02:29 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: North Carolina
Watch: DD 118206
Posts: 1,857
|
|
7 May 2014, 02:54 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 13
|
|
7 May 2014, 03:00 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Atlanta
Watch: 116000
Posts: 146
|
36mm - classic. You def will want the new bracelet - so I would suggest sourcing one to install or just getting the 116000.
|
7 May 2014, 03:05 PM | #14 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,499
|
If anything, the shiny numerals on the 39 dress it up just a little more?
I don't know. They are both plenty sporty while being classy and understated at the same time. |
7 May 2014, 03:10 PM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: California
Watch: 116618LN
Posts: 566
|
39
|
7 May 2014, 03:17 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: northern CA USA
Watch: 114270 Explorer
Posts: 477
|
To my eye, the 39mm looks sportier, while the 36mm looks more classically proportioned. I prefer the look of the 36 but the size of the 39, which is why I don't yet own a Rolex Explorer. If I had to choose, I'd go 39 (due to size) but I continue to hope that the 314270 will perfectly blend the two ;-)
|
7 May 2014, 03:27 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Dayto/5164
Posts: 1,631
|
This
__________________
IG : @aka_karbo |
7 May 2014, 03:30 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,984
|
39
Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
__________________
Lead by example through production. |
7 May 2014, 03:32 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 13
|
|
7 May 2014, 03:48 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Capt Swerve
Location: North Carolina
Watch: less TV
Posts: 2,224
|
36mm. It won't be in the way as much as the 39mm.
|
7 May 2014, 03:49 PM | #21 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Hoth
Posts: 1,242
|
36mm is "sportier" due to the lumed markers at 3, 6, and 9.
The shiny white gold markers on the 39mm model make it way more blingy/dressy. |
7 May 2014, 04:19 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: USA
Watch: GMTII
Posts: 1,180
|
I'd say they're pretty much the same. I'm not sure how the new movement compares to the old one in terms of shockproof and durability. It's all relative. As far as looks goes, a 36mm on a skinny wrist will be a decent size sports watch whereas a 39mm on a beefy wrist could look small. Both watches have the timeless no BS sports watch design and tough build, but low profile enough to wear under a dress shirt.
|
7 May 2014, 05:47 PM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK / Spain
Watch: 39mm Explorer
Posts: 1,990
|
Chaps
Everyone is saying - go for the 36mm or go for the 39mm, but have you actually compared them side by side at the same time. I bought my Explorer in January and was looking for a 36mm model. Fortunately the dealer was wearing a 36mm model and the 39mm looked better and classier in every way. Also the bracelet looked better. I walked out with a 39mm one and have never regretted it. The 39mm update is a true success story, it is better than the 36mm in all respects. Regards Mick |
7 May 2014, 06:00 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: New York
Posts: 140
|
36 > 39
|
7 May 2014, 06:01 PM | #25 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Michael
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,177
|
Larger is sportier in the way you mean it (I think) but I prefer the look, size and balance on the wrist of the smaller . . .
__________________
A Lange Sohne * Blancpain * Hentschel Hamburg * Polo RL * Rolex |
7 May 2014, 07:05 PM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,237
|
This is just about Rolexes most hybrid watch imho between classy and sporty, and I would say the larger size lends itself more to a sporty feel as it fills up your wrist more as do the larger numerals.
|
7 May 2014, 07:11 PM | #27 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 32,224
|
214270. A little bigger and sturdier feeling gives it a edge in my opinion.
I love both. Bought the 36 for my father and plan to add the 39 for myself. |
7 May 2014, 09:42 PM | #28 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,730
|
Sporty is as sporty does...if you have <7" wrist the 39mm may look too big and on a >8" wrist the 36mm may look small.
So your size matters as much as case diameter. And either works great as being sporty when on a strap...
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
7 May 2014, 09:44 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 103
|
Depends on your wrist bro, i would choose 39
|
7 May 2014, 09:49 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sweden
Watch: Rolex, AP & PAM...
Posts: 1,403
|
None of them look sporty in my book, a SubC looks sportier to me anyway...
__________________
Rolex - SubC... AP - Diver... Panerai - PAM380 Omega - Speedy PRO |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.