ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Which one? | |||
2254 | 29 | 80.56% | |
212.30.41.20.01.003 - Blue dial | 7 | 19.44% | |
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
24 March 2017, 09:12 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,425
|
Seamaster 2254.50 or the current 212.30
I have decided to get an Omega Seamaster to use as my daily watch.
And for several weeks I have been bouncing back between the 2254 and the current SMPc model - blue dial. I have been offered a 2254 from 2002 and a lovely preowned 212.30 from 2013. Both imo are great looking watches and fit my wrist nicely. Buying both is not an option, as I don't tend to buy two of the same style watches. Here's what I think, but please forgive my amateurish approach and lack of knowledge: 2254 Pros Nice looking dial Love the sword hands Beautifully slim case Great lume ETA movement - so more flexibility when it comes to be repaired. Cons Older watch and movement 212.30 Pros Co-Axial movement Ceramic bezel nice looking dial Current model, made from the latest designs and technology Cons Sits slightly higher on the wrist The gloss finish on the dial Colour combination of the date There are most likely to be a few other pros and cons for either watch which I don't know about. This would be my only dive watch and its a possibility that at some point, I would fit it onto a rubber strap. I would very much appreciate the thoughts and advice from members on this forum. Who I have no doubt will have a far greater knowledge than I. Many thanks for your input.
__________________
|
24 March 2017, 09:13 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,652
|
2254.50
|
24 March 2017, 09:35 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Rommel
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 8,963
|
Seems like the 2254.50 might be best for you. Lately I've been considering the black 212.30 for the future, but much prefer the discontinued models it seems.
|
24 March 2017, 09:41 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,231
|
the 2254.50 i would take over any rolex sub any day as well....Omegas best seamaster ever made in my eyes
|
24 March 2017, 10:43 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,425
|
From a laymans point of view, why is the 2254 so popular?
__________________
|
24 March 2017, 10:56 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,906
|
Quote:
OP, I think u like the 2254.50 except for the movement, as I do. Have u tried both on?
__________________
|
|
24 March 2017, 02:37 PM | #7 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 1,433
|
Between those two I prefer the 2254.50 however I would prefer the 2531.80 over them both.
|
25 March 2017, 12:54 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Tom
Location: New Jersey
Watch: Sub Date
Posts: 318
|
one more vote for the 2254.50.... I have moved many watches like most of us on forum and 2254.50 just stands out and has been a keeper for me......
|
25 March 2017, 01:38 PM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,356
|
2254 gets my vote for sure.....it's got far more character than the current co-axial and fits more comfortably (waves and sword hands!). Not to mention an amazing lume. I can't say that ETA is better than the current in house but it has proven to be bombproof throughout the long years also.
|
25 March 2017, 03:32 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 28
|
2254. Long live the swords.
|
25 March 2017, 05:32 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,425
|
In all 3 threads that I have run over the different forums. The 2254 has shown up to be a clear winner.
That said there is still something about the newer ceramic version that I like. And because I don't want to dismiss it so quickly but instead have a longer period of time with both. And see if one stands out as the clear winner, I am going to try and hold onto both and do more detailed comparison. Don't believe that I have ever had two similar watches in my collection at the sometime!
__________________
|
25 March 2017, 09:30 PM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,231
|
|
25 March 2017, 10:37 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,652
|
|
28 March 2017, 05:05 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,425
|
Well after a weekend of wearing the two watches.
One is staying and the other is on its way back......... I have decided to keep just the one and not both. The 2254 will become my working watch. Why I went with the 2254, was down to the slimness of the case, the lume - which is fantastic and how comfortable it felt on my wrist. And maybe, just a little bit, the overwhelming popularity for it amongst all three forums, which I posed the question on! Thanks to everyone who contributed to the thread. I am now looking to add a OEM black rubber strap and deployant from the Boutique in Bond St.
__________________
|
28 March 2017, 05:05 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 25,987
|
2254
__________________
|
28 March 2017, 05:27 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
|
The 2254.50 is a great watch.
|
28 March 2017, 07:50 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16750/16800/126710
Posts: 1,400
|
go for 2913 re-issue. more expensive but looks the best!
|
30 March 2017, 12:59 AM | #18 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Max
Location: Toronto
Watch: Exp 1, DJ Tuxedo
Posts: 2,438
|
Great choice. Enjoy it. Classic.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.