ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 September 2017, 02:02 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA Baby!
Posts: 1,068
|
Mk3 insert or 80s service.
I showed to 2 well respected friends. Each said the opposite. Which is it? The watch is a 6.0 serial. The 4 and the 3 do not match what I understand to be a mark 3. Thx.
|
23 September 2017, 02:13 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,194
|
Late 1970s insert. Not a Mark III.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
23 September 2017, 05:39 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,789
|
x2. Same one on my late '70s 1680 Sub. The font is a little thinner than on the MK3s.
|
23 September 2017, 06:11 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: SeB
Location: Germany
Watch: MaD_aT_gMt
Posts: 1,219
|
@John: +1
@Aaron: your inlay is different from the GinaMaries. Have a look especially at the 5. GianaMaries is kinda "long five" (not related to the early Long5s). Often seen on late 70's/very early 80's Subs and Seadwellers. Your Inlay has a completely different 4 and 5. I have the same on my 1680 and until today I'm not sure, in which period I would put it..... |
23 September 2017, 02:59 PM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,789
|
Hmmmm .... not sure. They look pretty darn close to me. Keep in mind that angles in photos, and how they're blown up can create slight perceived differences. Neither are MK3s, that's for sure.
|
23 September 2017, 03:23 PM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,194
|
You are correct Aaron .. . . they do look pretty darn close, but, they are not the same. The fours and fives have different fonts when comparing the OP's insert to your insert which is not caused by lighting or camera angles.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
24 September 2017, 02:46 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,789
|
Ah, OK, any ideas what either of these inserts are, category-wise? Would they have been original to late '70s into mid-80s, or Rolex replacements around that time? Neither of them are thin-font service inserts, but I can't find a lot of info on other post-MK3 Sub inserts, other then vague references to "mid-font" inserts.
|
24 September 2017, 04:12 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Bob
Location: Uk
Posts: 53
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.