ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

sierra11b · 14 September 2018, 08:39 AM

I couldn't find any thread comparing these two cases here or via an image search, so thought it would be worth noting, even for the aspiring 36 OP guys.

The DJ does wear a big larger and when side-by-side you might think you made the wrong choice in procuring a 114270, until you strap her on.

It's a strange phenomenon but they wear similarly. I think it's that the less-beefy lugs of the 36mm explorer gives the illusion of a longer lug-to-lug size vs. its stout cousins. Those who covet the 114270 already know but for those skeptical, fear not:

On 6.75" wrist:

14 September 2018, 08:39 AM	#1
sierra11b "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Eric Location: California Watch: MkXVIII, 3570.50 Posts: 1,966	114270 vs. 116234 shot. I couldn't find any thread comparing these two cases here or via an image search, so thought it would be worth noting, even for the aspiring 36 OP guys. The DJ does wear a big larger and when side-by-side you might think you made the wrong choice in procuring a 114270, until you strap her on. It's a strange phenomenon but they wear similarly. I think it's that the less-beefy lugs of the 36mm explorer gives the illusion of a longer lug-to-lug size vs. its stout cousins. Those who covet the 114270 already know but for those skeptical, fear not: On 6.75" wrist:

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)