|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 March 2016, 09:37 PM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Niels Pedersen
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 57
|
HELP: Tudor 9411/0 - dial relumed?
Well, the title says i t all. Is this dial relumed?
 
|
|
|
|
17 March 2016, 10:51 PM
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Watch: of course
Posts: 8,429
|
My guess is yes
|
|
|
|
|
17 March 2016, 11:41 PM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Jason
Location: Connecticut
Watch: Tudor 7016, 94010
Posts: 256
|
Yes they have, and pretty poorly I might add.
I'd be a lot more suspect of the square crown guards and mashed up insert. |
|
|
|
|
17 March 2016, 11:46 PM
|
#4 |
|
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,846
|
How did that insert get so chewed up on the crystal side?
__________________
TRF Member 11738 |
|
|
|
|
18 March 2016, 12:00 AM
|
#5 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Paris
Posts: 73
|
Quote:
__________________
Submariner 1680 Tiffany / Submariner 14060 / GMT Master II 16710 / GMT Master II 116710 BLNR /// PAM00337 /// Omega DeVille |
|
|
|
|
|
18 March 2016, 01:30 AM
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
|
Yes, poorly done.
|
|
|
|
|
18 March 2016, 02:55 AM
|
#7 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,293
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 March 2016, 03:32 AM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Jim
Location: Connecticut
Watch: this! Hold my beer
Posts: 2,813
|
Absolutely re-lumed. Probably no effort to remove the original either and they glopped more on top.
Too bad, but maybe someone with ninja skills could remove the "new" lume without destroying the dial? Blue dials are not very common. |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
