The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 January 2020, 09:58 PM   #1
Erson
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: jakarta
Posts: 243
Durability between Steel, YG, RG, WG, Platinum

I always wonder, which material is the strongest metal.

Especially white gold vs yellow gold. There are articles said that white gold is stronger than yellow gold. In fact many people said white gold is so prone to scratch compare to yellow gold. Which one is correct?

Platinum is more durable than gold, but what if Platinum vs Steel?

Can you could rank these materials from its durability?

1) Steel or Platinum??
2) ??
3) Rose gold??
4) White gold??
5) Yellow gold??
Erson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2020, 10:02 PM   #2
mttb
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 48
YG is generally soft, and given what is being written about the blends Rolex is using, it is the softest among the five
mttb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2020, 10:07 PM   #3
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,895
https://www.jewelrynotes.com/the-moh...-is-important/
__________________
Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Glashutte Senator Exellence, Rolex 116710 GMT Master II BLNR, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent
beshannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2020, 10:17 PM   #4
Kostas
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Kostas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Australia
Watch: @ kostastimepieces
Posts: 5,241
I’ve had stainless and pm pieces.

Unless you’re doing scientific testing “with this much pressure the scratch will go so deep”

In real life if you’re not careful you’ll get scratches on any metal, if you look after it, it will stay pristine longer.

Mine has a few minor hairlines but overall has lasted just as well as an SS piece



A slight weakness in metal does not even come close to outweighing the Beauty :)
Kostas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2020, 10:21 PM   #5
MTdweller
"TRF" Member
 
MTdweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Ty
Location: West Coast
Watch: the time fly!
Posts: 1,475
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kostas View Post
I’ve had stainless and pm pieces.

Unless you’re doing scientific testing “with this much pressure the scratch will go so deep”

In real life if you’re not careful you’ll get scratches on any metal, if you look after it, it will stay pristine longer.

Mine has a few minor hairlines but overall has lasted just as well as an SS piece



A slight weakness in metal does not even come close to outweighing the Beauty :)
Yes! Beautiful watch!
MTdweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2020, 10:42 PM   #6
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
I agree with Kostas: I have had SS, Platinum (Daytona), and many WG watches, currently the Smurf. In my experience, all scratch about equal but the scratches are superficial and the scratches do not mar the beauty. My Smurf had a thousand scratches, I don't baby my watches, but it still looks great unless you look at it up close. And even then it just looks like a well-used watch.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kostas View Post
I’ve had stainless and pm pieces.

Unless you’re doing scientific testing “with this much pressure the scratch will go so deep”

In real life if you’re not careful you’ll get scratches on any metal, if you look after it, it will stay pristine longer.

Mine has a few minor hairlines but overall has lasted just as well as an SS piece



A slight weakness in metal does not even come close to outweighing the Beauty :)
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2020, 11:01 PM   #7
glamorama
"TRF" Member
 
glamorama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Dan
Location: Benelux
Posts: 1,919
From my experience gold get more visible "dings" than steel. Scratches probably about the same in my estimation.
glamorama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2020, 11:04 PM   #8
macrowatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Posts: 4,365
Quote:
Originally Posted by glamorama View Post
From my experience gold get more visible "dings" than steel. Scratches probably about the same in my estimation.
Same.
macrowatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2020, 12:24 AM   #9
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,758
SS shrugs off contact with more materials than gold. It puzzles me how people can claim otherwise. I must just live in a really gritty, dirty environment.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2020, 03:39 PM   #10
Erson
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: jakarta
Posts: 243
so its all the same durability?
Erson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2020, 04:16 PM   #11
Andad
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,807
Quote:
Originally Posted by beshannon View Post
This refers to the pure metals?

There is a big variation in 18k gold hardness depending on the amalgam and the annealing process.

18k gold can be harder than 9k gold depending on the mix and preparation.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Safari - 21 Nov 2018 at 16_24.pdf (255.8 KB, 72 views)
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2020, 04:44 PM   #12
kilyung
2024 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,870
I’ve noticed no appreciable difference in durability of any of my watches regardless of metal. The wearer (me) is more likely to get damaged before the watch.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2020, 08:44 PM   #13
Yess
"TRF" Member
 
Yess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Good Hope
Watch: 124060
Posts: 1,596
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onikage View Post
SS shrugs off contact with more materials than gold. It puzzles me how people can claim otherwise. I must just live in a really gritty, dirty environment.
I'd have thought the same thing. Otherwise - let's go back and change the periodic table.
Yess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2020, 09:47 PM   #14
danyvw
"TRF" Member
 
danyvw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Sub16610, DJ126331
Posts: 1,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yess View Post
I'd have thought the same thing. Otherwise - let's go back and change the periodic table.
Nahh, Mendeleev never had a Rolex.

Sent from my SM-T720 using Tapatalk
danyvw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2020, 09:56 PM   #15
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erson View Post
I always wonder, which material is the strongest metal.

Especially white gold vs yellow gold. There are articles said that white gold is stronger than yellow gold. In fact many people said white gold is so prone to scratch compare to yellow gold. Which one is correct?

Platinum is more durable than gold, but what if Platinum vs Steel?

Can you could rank these materials from its durability?

1) Steel or Platinum??
2) ??
3) Rose gold??
4) White gold??
5) Yellow gold??
Is the purpose of your question for research or are you buying a watch based on it? All Rolex watches regardless of metal wear well. I have seen pristine gold watches and beat to hell stainless steel watches. All depends on how you wear and take care of them. I wear solid YG because it brings me the most pleasure and the glow of gold on the wrist is worth any sacrifice in "durability".
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2020, 01:00 AM   #16
cerendigit
"TRF" Member
 
cerendigit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Seattle
Watch: Casio digital
Posts: 1,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kostas View Post
In real life if you’re not careful you’ll get scratches on any metal, if you look after it, it will stay pristine longer.

A slight weakness in metal does not even come close to outweighing the Beauty :)

This.

I have owned SS and WG. How you treat your watches is more important than WG vs SS etc

Also if that’s what’s preventing you frombuying your first PM piece, don’t worry and pull the trigger it’s worth it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
cerendigit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2020, 01:05 AM   #17
Quailhunter
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Doug
Location: Georgia USA
Watch: Rolex President
Posts: 1,348
I have a yellow gold DayDate that I bought in the early 90s and wear often. It definitely has wear marks, but they don’t seem to show up like they do on my steel Rolex watches.
Quailhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2020, 02:27 AM   #18
MTdweller
"TRF" Member
 
MTdweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Ty
Location: West Coast
Watch: the time fly!
Posts: 1,475
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigblu10 View Post
Is the purpose of your question for research or are you buying a watch based on it? All Rolex watches regardless of metal wear well. I have seen pristine gold watches and beat to hell stainless steel watches. All depends on how you wear and take care of them. I wear solid YG because it brings me the most pleasure and the glow of gold on the wrist is worth any sacrifice in "durability".
Agreed.
MTdweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2020, 02:37 AM   #19
Tangier11
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Paul
Location: Southern Virginia
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 2,544
Owning both SS & YG, I can honestly see say I see NO difference.
Tangier11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2020, 03:28 AM   #20
bp1000
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Midlands, UK
Posts: 4,703
A scratch is a scratch to me.

If its going to scratch YG It will scratch steel.

I own watches of all metals, some with both on the same watch. Everything looks equally scratched. I just wouldn't worry about durability when buying a watch.

Your clumsiness level is much more of an indicator to how scratched and beat up a watch will appear.
bp1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2020, 03:35 AM   #21
Mystro
2024 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 14,711
YG is super easy to polish to perfection. You can be a novice and do a good job. 904L is certainly harder but requires a few special tricks to get a perfect polish over 316l. 316l is a easier steel to polish. Rolex Everose gets a slight warm patina on it as it ages. When when you polish a section, it gets a bit brighter so it has its own issues to work around.
There is no free lunch with any metal used.
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2020, 04:13 AM   #22
franktehtank
"TRF" Member
 
franktehtank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Canada
Watch: Sub, GMT
Posts: 712
All the materials will scratch and scuff. Less force is needed to create a dent in PM than in SS, so therefore you're more likely to pick up dents a nicks through daily wear.

If you wore each one for 10 years daily, and wore them the same way (I.E. treated all watches the same regardless of material) they'll all show the signs of wear at the end. I'd expect the PM pieces to be a little worse.
franktehtank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2020, 04:55 AM   #23
Abarth90
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Vienna
Watch: 16710 / 18038
Posts: 258
I thought platinum has no Material loss at all?!
Abarth90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2020, 05:49 AM   #24
joli160
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by bp1000 View Post
A scratch is a scratch to me.

If its going to scratch YG It will scratch steel.

I own watches of all metals, some with both on the same watch. Everything looks equally scratched. I just wouldn't worry about durability when buying a watch.

Your clumsiness level is much more of an indicator to how scratched and beat up a watch will appear.
This, makes no difference
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2020, 06:52 AM   #25
Likestheshiny
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: _
Posts: 1,877
Quote:
If its going to scratch YG It will scratch steel.
This is just plain untrue. There are things that will scratch Rolex's 18k gold but not oystersteel. The gold is softer, and there's just no getting around that.

I'm firmly in the "The difference isn't big enough to worry about" camp personally, but let's not just ignore the actual facts.
Likestheshiny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2020, 06:56 AM   #26
RJRJRJ
"TRF" Member
 
RJRJRJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 3,496
I haven't noticed any difference between SS and RG.
RJRJRJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2020, 10:03 AM   #27
SN13
"TRF" Member
 
SN13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,124
My SS bracelets and my YG bracelets both get desk scratches.
__________________
IG@Construction_Time

--- 1986 DD 18038 --- 1992 YM 16628 --- 2015 116600 SD4K --- SBDX001 MM300 --- 2009 Omega Ploprof White --- 2010 Omega LE LMPO
SN13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2020, 11:21 AM   #28
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,479
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
I’ve noticed no appreciable difference in durability of any of my watches regardless of metal. The wearer (me) is more likely to get damaged before the watch.
Boom. The perfect response to this, and all the other hundreds of threads on this very subject.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.