The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 16 June 2015, 11:17 PM   #1
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,623
Anyone familiar with Bremont ?.

I've taken an interest in their watches lately, some of their designs are interesting and I like the aviation themes and British connection.

Went to the Bremont boutique on Madison Ave in Manhattan last week, a very nice setting. All their collections were on display, the sales rep was very informative, tried on a few models. I can see why these boutiques are gaining favor among watchmakers, the setting is perfect, a dedicated sales staff and no competition.

My question on the Bremont brand, how are their watches for reliability, durability and service? Thanks for your comments.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline  
Old 17 June 2015, 01:12 AM   #2
CaptLeslie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Litchfield Park
Posts: 81
I have been a Bremont fan for years and own several models. They are well made watches with high tech materials from aviation as the material for their cases! The case design is unique and functional! The movements, for most models, are ETA based with their own modifications for accuracy and durability. Their customer service is outstanding! Like all watches stuff happens and they are very responsive to making your purchase rewarding! The NY Boutique is brand new and at some point they will have a service center their for us in the States. If you like their unique design and aviation inspired watches, I would not hesitate to purchase! Good luck with your purchase decision and if you do buy a Bremont, I think you won't regret the decision! Cheers Jim
CaptLeslie is offline  
Old 17 June 2015, 01:27 AM   #3
Watchflair
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
 
Watchflair's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Jim
Location: Westchester NY
Watch: 116500 116518LN
Posts: 5,873
Developing an appreciation for their pieces. I've had the opportunity to check out a few fellow collectors pieces and I can definitely see the appeal. The question that always remains is : would this get your dollar over another piece... Lots of competition on that end.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Remember what matters. Value everyday
Watchflair is offline  
Old 17 June 2015, 04:04 AM   #4
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
They lost a lot of respect with the marketed in-house movement debacle a while back.
capote is offline  
Old 17 June 2015, 04:35 AM   #5
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
I think they meant that they installed their ETA movements in-house (*_*)

Quote:
Originally Posted by capote View Post
They lost a lot of respect with the marketed in-house movement debacle a while back.
locutus49 is offline  
Old 17 June 2015, 04:59 AM   #6
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,623
Quote:
Originally Posted by capote View Post
They lost a lot of respect with the marketed in-house movement debacle a while back.
I saw this mentioned in another thread, but I don't know any of the particulars. Is it common for watch makers to send empty cases to ETA, or whomever is supplying, let them install the movements and ship back for finishing?

And when one says they use third party movements which are modified for a specific maker, who does the modifying, the movement maker or the watch maker?

Was Bremont's problem unforgivable? They lost respect, but was it a problem identified and corrected or are there continuing problems? I know there's a cache with in-house movement design and manufacturing, but plenty of fine watchmakers use third party.

These issues get to the heart of how I evaluate the brand - long term reliability and durability. And service. I'm not as concerned with resale, but I am keen on good value.

This is my first serious consideration of a relatively expensive watch that is not among the top brands, so I've got a lot of questions and checking to do. Owners and aficionados with real experience are most helpful, so I appreciate the responses.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline  
Old 17 June 2015, 05:05 AM   #7
mikea
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: mike
Location: Dallas, Tx
Watch: Rolex and AP
Posts: 1,047
I've had Bremonts for years and still have my Solo. Will most likely not be getting rid of it anytime soon. They are very well made...and I am looking to add another Bremont early next year.
__________________
DD40 RG, SkyDweller, AP RO 15500
Exp 2 ,WG YM 42, YM 40
mikea is offline  
Old 17 June 2015, 05:10 AM   #8
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,623
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptLeslie View Post
I have been a Bremont fan for years and own several models. They are well made watches with high tech materials from aviation as the material for their cases! The case design is unique and functional! The movements, for most models, are ETA based with their own modifications for accuracy and durability. Their customer service is outstanding! Like all watches stuff happens and they are very responsive to making your purchase rewarding! The NY Boutique is brand new and at some point they will have a service center their for us in the States. If you like their unique design and aviation inspired watches, I would not hesitate to purchase! Good luck with your purchase decision and if you do buy a Bremont, I think you won't regret the decision! Cheers Jim
Thanks for your comments. It's nice to hear from an owner with first hand experience, guess you didn't have a bad experience with the movement problem someone else cited (see my other post on this thread).

Yes, the case construction seems like a unique approach, along with a number of other designs, features and materials I find appealing, even if I'm not technically savvy enough to compare to other brands. Like most watches (and other nice things) we like what we like for our own personal reasons, this forum provides good information to help the decision process. Thanks again.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline  
Old 17 June 2015, 05:16 AM   #9
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,623
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikea View Post
I've had Bremonts for years and still have my Solo. Will most likely not be getting rid of it anytime soon. They are very well made...and I am looking to add another Bremont early next year.
Yes, I tried on a Solo, love the clean look. Black dial on a black strap, nice look! I'm a bit over done on black dials, need some diversification, but hey, you like what you like.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline  
Old 17 June 2015, 05:34 AM   #10
GradyPhilpott
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 116710 BLNR
Posts: 34,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by capote View Post
They lost a lot of respect with the marketed in-house movement debacle a while back.
This is very much the case with me and the more I looked into the company and it's advertising, I ran across quite a number of things about the company that are less than honestly described.

Corporate integrity means as much or more to me than the product they produce.

I would not care to own one.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline  
Old 17 June 2015, 01:14 PM   #11
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,623
Well, after some of the comments here about the in house movement debacle I did some further checking, and it certainly does call in to question the integrity of the owners. It's a shame, because as many pointed out, Bremont produces a fine line of watches with many unique and interesting attributes, and it seems their deception was unnecessary.

I still like several models, and I think their designs, materials and production processes are interesting, I don't want to give up in the brand. But it is disconcerting, undermines my confidence in the long term reliability of the firm, not the mechanical reliability of their watches.

I'm a buy and hold watch fan, and I want to be confident of the organization behind the timepiece. My enthusiasm has cooled a bit, I'll go slow on this one, not writing them off but a bit more wary.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline  
Old 8 December 2015, 04:05 PM   #12
vipereaper30
2024 Pledge Member
 
vipereaper30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: BMF
Location: California USA
Watch: FPJ UTC
Posts: 2,243
Bremont makes very high quality watches and is doing A LOT of business with the military. I think their future is bright. Here's my favorite watch of my entire collection, the Bremont Dragon Lady:

vipereaper30 is offline  
Old 8 December 2015, 09:01 PM   #13
RUK
"TRF" Member
 
RUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Ruk
Location: .ie
Watch: 5711,Sub,Daytona,P
Posts: 1,232
Not my cup of tea. Trying too hard to be something they are not. The In House debacle was the last nail in the coffin for me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
'The best watch out there is the one you like the most'
RUK is offline  
Old 14 December 2015, 08:22 AM   #14
topcat30093
"TRF" Member
 
topcat30093's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,425
I recently bought a Solo CR. And immediately sent it to have a service done as it was 5 yrs old and I wanted to make sure that everything was in perfect running order.
__________________
topcat30093 is offline  
Old 14 December 2015, 08:43 AM   #15
vman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Capt Swerve
Location: North Carolina
Watch: less TV
Posts: 2,224
I've see a few in person... At this time I will pass.

The company seems to be play a lot in the marketing-to-the-tool-watch crowd space. The mechanisms are based on ETA. The stories behind timepieces are "inspired" by the typical macho-man stuff most of average guys can only dream about.
vman is offline  
Old 16 December 2015, 04:30 AM   #16
Gundam
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK / HK
Posts: 188
All companies put a spin on their products, it's the nature of marketing. TagHeuer did a similar thing with their 'in house' Seiko-based movement. There are worse trespasses in my opinion, such as the Panerai limited edition with the (not so) special movement.
Gundam is offline  
Old 16 December 2015, 05:31 AM   #17
towernick
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 880
Too many other watches to own at Bremont's price points.
towernick is offline  
Old 13 September 2018, 02:52 AM   #18
shedlock2000
2024 Pledge Member
 
shedlock2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
I own an ALT1 ZT/BK and it’s an outstanding watch. It’s a heavily modified eta movement, and this particular one is the most accurate wristwatch I’ve ever owned — and I’ve owned a lot of Rolexes.

The case construction is a bit unusual, but I wear it on a NATO and I’m pleased about the prettier... maybe more attractive ... case. I recently bought and sold the Tudor GMT, because it wasn’t anywhere near as comfortable (or as accurate) as the Bremont.

Their watches are robust, easy to wear (if a little bulky), reliable, functional, and innovative. Bremont’s rotating chapter ring is a nice piece of engineering and locates with a feel that is seconded only by Rolex’s gmt bezel. They also nicely apply the lume which is thick, bright, and includes a 0/24 hour marker on the chapter ring as well as on the chrono hands.

On the downside for me: the Zulu vs. GMT hand movement is frustrating (I travel a bit and prefer ‘true gmt’ hand operation), I can’t wear the leather strap because the clasp irritates my wrist (which means it’s a bit hard for me to dress it up), and the watch is a bit tall (though 1.5mm thinner than the PO GMT).

In short, I think Bremont get a pretty rough and undeserved deal.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.


SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT
shedlock2000 is offline  
Old 13 September 2018, 02:56 AM   #19
_speedmaster_
"TRF" Member
 
_speedmaster_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,443
Why did you dig up 3 old Bremont threads and post your same review to all 3?
__________________
Blancpain | Chopard LUC | Grand Seiko/King Seiko | Grönefeld | Laurent Ferrier | Moritz Grossmann | Omega | Trilobe | Urban Jürgensen


instagram.com/ct_watch_guy
_speedmaster_ is offline  
Old 13 September 2018, 04:21 AM   #20
shedlock2000
2024 Pledge Member
 
shedlock2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
Quote:
Originally Posted by _speedmaster_ View Post
Why did you dig up 3 old Bremont threads and post your same review to all 3?


Because not all people read each thread and sometimes only stumble across one. Better question to ask why there are three threads asking largely the same question, and an even better question is to ask why you would be so upset at my cross-posting to write a comment about the fact (on all three), rather than on the content of the posts.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.


SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT
shedlock2000 is offline  
Old 13 September 2018, 05:03 AM   #21
_speedmaster_
"TRF" Member
 
_speedmaster_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,443
I'm far from upset, I'm actually amused. I'm just genuinely curious as to your unusual thought process. I've yet to see this tactic, of digging up multiple old threads (one that has been dead for 3 years) to post the same thing. Why stop at 3? Why not 5 or 10? Surely more people will stumble upon 10 different threads than 3. Now, a part of me wanted to stop at one thread response. But I amuse myself too much.
__________________
Blancpain | Chopard LUC | Grand Seiko/King Seiko | Grönefeld | Laurent Ferrier | Moritz Grossmann | Omega | Trilobe | Urban Jürgensen


instagram.com/ct_watch_guy
_speedmaster_ is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.